Cargando…

Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols

Exposure to ultrafine combustion aerosols such as particulate matter (PM) from residential woodburning, forest fires, cigarette smoke, and traffic emission have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy presents a sensitive and cost-effective alternative f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahamuni, Gaurav, He, Jiayang, Rutherford, Jay, Ockerman, Byron, Majumdar, Arka, Seto, Edmund, Korshin, Gregory, Novosselov, Igor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251664
_version_ 1783695484988162048
author Mahamuni, Gaurav
He, Jiayang
Rutherford, Jay
Ockerman, Byron
Majumdar, Arka
Seto, Edmund
Korshin, Gregory
Novosselov, Igor
author_facet Mahamuni, Gaurav
He, Jiayang
Rutherford, Jay
Ockerman, Byron
Majumdar, Arka
Seto, Edmund
Korshin, Gregory
Novosselov, Igor
author_sort Mahamuni, Gaurav
collection PubMed
description Exposure to ultrafine combustion aerosols such as particulate matter (PM) from residential woodburning, forest fires, cigarette smoke, and traffic emission have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy presents a sensitive and cost-effective alternative for analysis of PM organic fraction. However, as with other analytical chemistry methods, the miniaturization is hindered by a solvent extraction step and a need for benchtop instrumentation. We present a methodology for collecting and in-situ analysis of airborne nanoparticles that eliminates labor-intensive sample preparation and miniaturizes the detection platform. Nanoparticles are electrostatically collected onto a transparent substrate coated with solid-phase (SP) solvent—polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The PM organic fraction is extracted into PDMS and analyzed in-situ, thus avoiding liquid-phase extraction. In the SP-EEM analysis, we evaluated external and internal excitation schemes. Internal excitation shows the lowest scattering interference but leads to signal masking from PDMS fluorescence for λ<250nm. The external excitation EEM spectra are dependent on the excitation light incident angle; ranges of 30–40° and 55–65° show the best results. SP-EEM spectra of woodsmoke and cigarette smoke samples are in good agreement with the EEM spectra of liquid-phase extracts. The SP-EEM technique can be used to develop wearable sensors for exposure assessments and environmental monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81367212021-06-02 Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols Mahamuni, Gaurav He, Jiayang Rutherford, Jay Ockerman, Byron Majumdar, Arka Seto, Edmund Korshin, Gregory Novosselov, Igor PLoS One Research Article Exposure to ultrafine combustion aerosols such as particulate matter (PM) from residential woodburning, forest fires, cigarette smoke, and traffic emission have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy presents a sensitive and cost-effective alternative for analysis of PM organic fraction. However, as with other analytical chemistry methods, the miniaturization is hindered by a solvent extraction step and a need for benchtop instrumentation. We present a methodology for collecting and in-situ analysis of airborne nanoparticles that eliminates labor-intensive sample preparation and miniaturizes the detection platform. Nanoparticles are electrostatically collected onto a transparent substrate coated with solid-phase (SP) solvent—polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The PM organic fraction is extracted into PDMS and analyzed in-situ, thus avoiding liquid-phase extraction. In the SP-EEM analysis, we evaluated external and internal excitation schemes. Internal excitation shows the lowest scattering interference but leads to signal masking from PDMS fluorescence for λ<250nm. The external excitation EEM spectra are dependent on the excitation light incident angle; ranges of 30–40° and 55–65° show the best results. SP-EEM spectra of woodsmoke and cigarette smoke samples are in good agreement with the EEM spectra of liquid-phase extracts. The SP-EEM technique can be used to develop wearable sensors for exposure assessments and environmental monitoring. Public Library of Science 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8136721/ /pubmed/34014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251664 Text en © 2021 Mahamuni et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mahamuni, Gaurav
He, Jiayang
Rutherford, Jay
Ockerman, Byron
Majumdar, Arka
Seto, Edmund
Korshin, Gregory
Novosselov, Igor
Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
title Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
title_full Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
title_fullStr Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
title_full_unstemmed Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
title_short Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
title_sort solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251664
work_keys_str_mv AT mahamunigaurav solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT hejiayang solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT rutherfordjay solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT ockermanbyron solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT majumdararka solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT setoedmund solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT korshingregory solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols
AT novosselovigor solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols