Cargando…
Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols
Exposure to ultrafine combustion aerosols such as particulate matter (PM) from residential woodburning, forest fires, cigarette smoke, and traffic emission have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy presents a sensitive and cost-effective alternative f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251664 |
_version_ | 1783695484988162048 |
---|---|
author | Mahamuni, Gaurav He, Jiayang Rutherford, Jay Ockerman, Byron Majumdar, Arka Seto, Edmund Korshin, Gregory Novosselov, Igor |
author_facet | Mahamuni, Gaurav He, Jiayang Rutherford, Jay Ockerman, Byron Majumdar, Arka Seto, Edmund Korshin, Gregory Novosselov, Igor |
author_sort | Mahamuni, Gaurav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exposure to ultrafine combustion aerosols such as particulate matter (PM) from residential woodburning, forest fires, cigarette smoke, and traffic emission have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy presents a sensitive and cost-effective alternative for analysis of PM organic fraction. However, as with other analytical chemistry methods, the miniaturization is hindered by a solvent extraction step and a need for benchtop instrumentation. We present a methodology for collecting and in-situ analysis of airborne nanoparticles that eliminates labor-intensive sample preparation and miniaturizes the detection platform. Nanoparticles are electrostatically collected onto a transparent substrate coated with solid-phase (SP) solvent—polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The PM organic fraction is extracted into PDMS and analyzed in-situ, thus avoiding liquid-phase extraction. In the SP-EEM analysis, we evaluated external and internal excitation schemes. Internal excitation shows the lowest scattering interference but leads to signal masking from PDMS fluorescence for λ<250nm. The external excitation EEM spectra are dependent on the excitation light incident angle; ranges of 30–40° and 55–65° show the best results. SP-EEM spectra of woodsmoke and cigarette smoke samples are in good agreement with the EEM spectra of liquid-phase extracts. The SP-EEM technique can be used to develop wearable sensors for exposure assessments and environmental monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8136721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81367212021-06-02 Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols Mahamuni, Gaurav He, Jiayang Rutherford, Jay Ockerman, Byron Majumdar, Arka Seto, Edmund Korshin, Gregory Novosselov, Igor PLoS One Research Article Exposure to ultrafine combustion aerosols such as particulate matter (PM) from residential woodburning, forest fires, cigarette smoke, and traffic emission have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy presents a sensitive and cost-effective alternative for analysis of PM organic fraction. However, as with other analytical chemistry methods, the miniaturization is hindered by a solvent extraction step and a need for benchtop instrumentation. We present a methodology for collecting and in-situ analysis of airborne nanoparticles that eliminates labor-intensive sample preparation and miniaturizes the detection platform. Nanoparticles are electrostatically collected onto a transparent substrate coated with solid-phase (SP) solvent—polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The PM organic fraction is extracted into PDMS and analyzed in-situ, thus avoiding liquid-phase extraction. In the SP-EEM analysis, we evaluated external and internal excitation schemes. Internal excitation shows the lowest scattering interference but leads to signal masking from PDMS fluorescence for λ<250nm. The external excitation EEM spectra are dependent on the excitation light incident angle; ranges of 30–40° and 55–65° show the best results. SP-EEM spectra of woodsmoke and cigarette smoke samples are in good agreement with the EEM spectra of liquid-phase extracts. The SP-EEM technique can be used to develop wearable sensors for exposure assessments and environmental monitoring. Public Library of Science 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8136721/ /pubmed/34014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251664 Text en © 2021 Mahamuni et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mahamuni, Gaurav He, Jiayang Rutherford, Jay Ockerman, Byron Majumdar, Arka Seto, Edmund Korshin, Gregory Novosselov, Igor Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
title | Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
title_full | Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
title_fullStr | Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
title_full_unstemmed | Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
title_short | Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
title_sort | solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahamunigaurav solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT hejiayang solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT rutherfordjay solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT ockermanbyron solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT majumdararka solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT setoedmund solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT korshingregory solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols AT novosselovigor solidphaseexcitationemissionmatrixspectroscopyforchemicalanalysisofcombustionaerosols |