Cargando…

Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea

Posaconazole prophylaxis is effective in decreasing the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the use of antifungal prophylaxis varies in real-life practice, and only a small number of studies have compared the incidence of IFDs between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Eunmi, Choi, Eun-Ji, Park, Han-Seung, Lee, Sang-Oh, Choi, Sang-Ho, Kim, Yang Soo, Lee, Jung-Hee, Lee, Je-Hwan, Lee, Kyoo-Hyung, Kim, Sung-Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025448
_version_ 1783695548274966528
author Yang, Eunmi
Choi, Eun-Ji
Park, Han-Seung
Lee, Sang-Oh
Choi, Sang-Ho
Kim, Yang Soo
Lee, Jung-Hee
Lee, Je-Hwan
Lee, Kyoo-Hyung
Kim, Sung-Han
author_facet Yang, Eunmi
Choi, Eun-Ji
Park, Han-Seung
Lee, Sang-Oh
Choi, Sang-Ho
Kim, Yang Soo
Lee, Jung-Hee
Lee, Je-Hwan
Lee, Kyoo-Hyung
Kim, Sung-Han
author_sort Yang, Eunmi
collection PubMed
description Posaconazole prophylaxis is effective in decreasing the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the use of antifungal prophylaxis varies in real-life practice, and only a small number of studies have compared the incidence of IFDs between those receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those without prophylaxis. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of IFDs between patients with AML who received posaconazole prophylaxis and those without antifungal prophylaxis. We reviewed the medical records of adult AML patients who underwent induction chemotherapy between June 2016 and October 2019 at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, South Korea), where posaconazole prophylaxis is not administered in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms that may hinder sufficient absorption of oral prophylactic agents, and in patients with abnormal liver functions considering the possible exacerbation of adverse events. Patients who received posaconazole prophylaxis for ≥7 days were included in the prophylaxis group. Clinical characteristics and outcomes including the incidence of IFDs were compared between the 2 groups. Of the 247 patients with AML who underwent induction chemotherapy, 162 (66%) received posaconazole prophylaxis and 85 (34%) did not receive any prophylaxis. The incidence of proven/probable IFD was significantly higher in the no prophylaxis group than in the prophylaxis group (9.4% [8/85] vs 2.5% [4/162], P = .03). Of the 8 cases of IFDs in the no prophylaxis group, 7 were mold infections and 1 was invasive candidiasis. Of the 4 cases of IFDs in the prophylaxis group, 3 were mold infections and 1 was invasive candidiasis. Patients with posaconazole prophylaxis less frequently received therapeutic antifungal therapy (2.5% vs 9.4%, P = .03) and had a longer median, duration from chemotherapy to antifungal therapy compared with the no prophylaxis group (18 vs 11 days, P < .01). The rate of IFD-related mortality was similar between the 2 groups (0.6% vs 0%, P > .99). Patients with AML who received posaconazole prophylaxis had a lower incidence of breakthrough IFDs compared with those who did not receive any prophylaxis. Invasive mold infection was the most common IFD regardless of antifungal prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81370492021-05-25 Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea Yang, Eunmi Choi, Eun-Ji Park, Han-Seung Lee, Sang-Oh Choi, Sang-Ho Kim, Yang Soo Lee, Jung-Hee Lee, Je-Hwan Lee, Kyoo-Hyung Kim, Sung-Han Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Posaconazole prophylaxis is effective in decreasing the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the use of antifungal prophylaxis varies in real-life practice, and only a small number of studies have compared the incidence of IFDs between those receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those without prophylaxis. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of IFDs between patients with AML who received posaconazole prophylaxis and those without antifungal prophylaxis. We reviewed the medical records of adult AML patients who underwent induction chemotherapy between June 2016 and October 2019 at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, South Korea), where posaconazole prophylaxis is not administered in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms that may hinder sufficient absorption of oral prophylactic agents, and in patients with abnormal liver functions considering the possible exacerbation of adverse events. Patients who received posaconazole prophylaxis for ≥7 days were included in the prophylaxis group. Clinical characteristics and outcomes including the incidence of IFDs were compared between the 2 groups. Of the 247 patients with AML who underwent induction chemotherapy, 162 (66%) received posaconazole prophylaxis and 85 (34%) did not receive any prophylaxis. The incidence of proven/probable IFD was significantly higher in the no prophylaxis group than in the prophylaxis group (9.4% [8/85] vs 2.5% [4/162], P = .03). Of the 8 cases of IFDs in the no prophylaxis group, 7 were mold infections and 1 was invasive candidiasis. Of the 4 cases of IFDs in the prophylaxis group, 3 were mold infections and 1 was invasive candidiasis. Patients with posaconazole prophylaxis less frequently received therapeutic antifungal therapy (2.5% vs 9.4%, P = .03) and had a longer median, duration from chemotherapy to antifungal therapy compared with the no prophylaxis group (18 vs 11 days, P < .01). The rate of IFD-related mortality was similar between the 2 groups (0.6% vs 0%, P > .99). Patients with AML who received posaconazole prophylaxis had a lower incidence of breakthrough IFDs compared with those who did not receive any prophylaxis. Invasive mold infection was the most common IFD regardless of antifungal prophylaxis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8137049/ /pubmed/34011022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025448 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4900
Yang, Eunmi
Choi, Eun-Ji
Park, Han-Seung
Lee, Sang-Oh
Choi, Sang-Ho
Kim, Yang Soo
Lee, Jung-Hee
Lee, Je-Hwan
Lee, Kyoo-Hyung
Kim, Sung-Han
Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea
title Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea
title_full Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea
title_fullStr Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea
title_short Comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: A single-center, observational, case-control study in South Korea
title_sort comparison of invasive fungal diseases between patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and those not receiving prophylaxis: a single-center, observational, case-control study in south korea
topic 4900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025448
work_keys_str_mv AT yangeunmi comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT choieunji comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT parkhanseung comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT leesangoh comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT choisangho comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT kimyangsoo comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT leejunghee comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT leejehwan comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT leekyoohyung comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea
AT kimsunghan comparisonofinvasivefungaldiseasesbetweenpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiareceivingposaconazoleprophylaxisandthosenotreceivingprophylaxisasinglecenterobservationalcasecontrolstudyinsouthkorea