Cargando…

Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks

To evaluate the rib fracture detection performance in computed tomography (CT) images using a software based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and compare it with the rib fracture diagnostic performance of doctors. We included CT images from 39 patients with thoracic injuries who underwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiume, Masafumi, Suzuki, Shigeru, Yasaka, Koichiro, Sugawara, Haruto, Shen, Yun, Katada, Yoshiaki, Ishikawa, Takuya, Fukui, Rika, Abe, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026024
_version_ 1783695551228805120
author Kaiume, Masafumi
Suzuki, Shigeru
Yasaka, Koichiro
Sugawara, Haruto
Shen, Yun
Katada, Yoshiaki
Ishikawa, Takuya
Fukui, Rika
Abe, Osamu
author_facet Kaiume, Masafumi
Suzuki, Shigeru
Yasaka, Koichiro
Sugawara, Haruto
Shen, Yun
Katada, Yoshiaki
Ishikawa, Takuya
Fukui, Rika
Abe, Osamu
author_sort Kaiume, Masafumi
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the rib fracture detection performance in computed tomography (CT) images using a software based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and compare it with the rib fracture diagnostic performance of doctors. We included CT images from 39 patients with thoracic injuries who underwent CT scans. In these images, 256 rib fractures were detected by two radiologists. This result was defined as the gold standard. The performances of rib fracture detection by the software and two interns were compared via the McNemar test and the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis. The sensitivity of the DCNN software was significantly higher than those of both Intern A (0.645 vs 0.313; P < .001) and Intern B (0.645 vs 0.258; P < .001). Based on the JAFROC analysis, the differences in the figure-of-merits between the results obtained via the DCNN software and those by Interns A and B were 0.057 (95% confidence interval: −0.081, 0.195) and 0.071 (−0.082, 0.224), respectively. As the non-inferiority margin was set to −0.10, the DCNN software is non-inferior to the rib fracture detection performed by both interns. In the detection of rib fractures, detection by the DCNN software could be an alternative to the interpretation performed by doctors who do not have intensive training experience in image interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81370612021-05-25 Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks Kaiume, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeru Yasaka, Koichiro Sugawara, Haruto Shen, Yun Katada, Yoshiaki Ishikawa, Takuya Fukui, Rika Abe, Osamu Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 To evaluate the rib fracture detection performance in computed tomography (CT) images using a software based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and compare it with the rib fracture diagnostic performance of doctors. We included CT images from 39 patients with thoracic injuries who underwent CT scans. In these images, 256 rib fractures were detected by two radiologists. This result was defined as the gold standard. The performances of rib fracture detection by the software and two interns were compared via the McNemar test and the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis. The sensitivity of the DCNN software was significantly higher than those of both Intern A (0.645 vs 0.313; P < .001) and Intern B (0.645 vs 0.258; P < .001). Based on the JAFROC analysis, the differences in the figure-of-merits between the results obtained via the DCNN software and those by Interns A and B were 0.057 (95% confidence interval: −0.081, 0.195) and 0.071 (−0.082, 0.224), respectively. As the non-inferiority margin was set to −0.10, the DCNN software is non-inferior to the rib fracture detection performed by both interns. In the detection of rib fractures, detection by the DCNN software could be an alternative to the interpretation performed by doctors who do not have intensive training experience in image interpretation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8137061/ /pubmed/34011107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026024 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 6800
Kaiume, Masafumi
Suzuki, Shigeru
Yasaka, Koichiro
Sugawara, Haruto
Shen, Yun
Katada, Yoshiaki
Ishikawa, Takuya
Fukui, Rika
Abe, Osamu
Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
title Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
title_full Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
title_fullStr Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
title_short Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
title_sort rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026024
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiumemasafumi ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT suzukishigeru ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT yasakakoichiro ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT sugawaraharuto ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT shenyun ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT katadayoshiaki ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT ishikawatakuya ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT fukuirika ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT abeosamu ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks