Cargando…
Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks
To evaluate the rib fracture detection performance in computed tomography (CT) images using a software based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and compare it with the rib fracture diagnostic performance of doctors. We included CT images from 39 patients with thoracic injuries who underwe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026024 |
_version_ | 1783695551228805120 |
---|---|
author | Kaiume, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeru Yasaka, Koichiro Sugawara, Haruto Shen, Yun Katada, Yoshiaki Ishikawa, Takuya Fukui, Rika Abe, Osamu |
author_facet | Kaiume, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeru Yasaka, Koichiro Sugawara, Haruto Shen, Yun Katada, Yoshiaki Ishikawa, Takuya Fukui, Rika Abe, Osamu |
author_sort | Kaiume, Masafumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the rib fracture detection performance in computed tomography (CT) images using a software based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and compare it with the rib fracture diagnostic performance of doctors. We included CT images from 39 patients with thoracic injuries who underwent CT scans. In these images, 256 rib fractures were detected by two radiologists. This result was defined as the gold standard. The performances of rib fracture detection by the software and two interns were compared via the McNemar test and the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis. The sensitivity of the DCNN software was significantly higher than those of both Intern A (0.645 vs 0.313; P < .001) and Intern B (0.645 vs 0.258; P < .001). Based on the JAFROC analysis, the differences in the figure-of-merits between the results obtained via the DCNN software and those by Interns A and B were 0.057 (95% confidence interval: −0.081, 0.195) and 0.071 (−0.082, 0.224), respectively. As the non-inferiority margin was set to −0.10, the DCNN software is non-inferior to the rib fracture detection performed by both interns. In the detection of rib fractures, detection by the DCNN software could be an alternative to the interpretation performed by doctors who do not have intensive training experience in image interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8137061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81370612021-05-25 Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks Kaiume, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeru Yasaka, Koichiro Sugawara, Haruto Shen, Yun Katada, Yoshiaki Ishikawa, Takuya Fukui, Rika Abe, Osamu Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 To evaluate the rib fracture detection performance in computed tomography (CT) images using a software based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and compare it with the rib fracture diagnostic performance of doctors. We included CT images from 39 patients with thoracic injuries who underwent CT scans. In these images, 256 rib fractures were detected by two radiologists. This result was defined as the gold standard. The performances of rib fracture detection by the software and two interns were compared via the McNemar test and the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis. The sensitivity of the DCNN software was significantly higher than those of both Intern A (0.645 vs 0.313; P < .001) and Intern B (0.645 vs 0.258; P < .001). Based on the JAFROC analysis, the differences in the figure-of-merits between the results obtained via the DCNN software and those by Interns A and B were 0.057 (95% confidence interval: −0.081, 0.195) and 0.071 (−0.082, 0.224), respectively. As the non-inferiority margin was set to −0.10, the DCNN software is non-inferior to the rib fracture detection performed by both interns. In the detection of rib fractures, detection by the DCNN software could be an alternative to the interpretation performed by doctors who do not have intensive training experience in image interpretation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8137061/ /pubmed/34011107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026024 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 6800 Kaiume, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeru Yasaka, Koichiro Sugawara, Haruto Shen, Yun Katada, Yoshiaki Ishikawa, Takuya Fukui, Rika Abe, Osamu Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
title | Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_full | Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_fullStr | Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_short | Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_sort | rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaiumemasafumi ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT suzukishigeru ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT yasakakoichiro ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT sugawaraharuto ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT shenyun ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT katadayoshiaki ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT ishikawatakuya ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT fukuirika ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT abeosamu ribfracturedetectionincomputedtomographyimagesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks |