Cargando…

Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients

There are 3 main types of incisions in major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline incision (MI), the transverse incision (TI) and the modified Makuuchi incision (MMI). This study aimed to compare these approaches regarding wound complications and hernias, with a special focus on suture mate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hempel, Sebastian, Kalauch, Anne, Oehme, Florian, Wolk, Steffen, Welsch, Thilo, Weitz, Jürgen, Distler, Marius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025989
_version_ 1783695551694372864
author Hempel, Sebastian
Kalauch, Anne
Oehme, Florian
Wolk, Steffen
Welsch, Thilo
Weitz, Jürgen
Distler, Marius
author_facet Hempel, Sebastian
Kalauch, Anne
Oehme, Florian
Wolk, Steffen
Welsch, Thilo
Weitz, Jürgen
Distler, Marius
author_sort Hempel, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description There are 3 main types of incisions in major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline incision (MI), the transverse incision (TI) and the modified Makuuchi incision (MMI). This study aimed to compare these approaches regarding wound complications and hernias, with a special focus on suture material and previous laparotomies. Patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2015 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were computed using stepwise binary and multifactorial regression models. In total, 696 patients (406 MI, 137 TI and 153 MMI) were included. No relevant differences were observed for patient characteristics (e.g., sex, age, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score). Fewer wound complications (TI 22.6% vs MI 33.5% vs MMI 32.7%, P = .04) occurred in the TI group. However, regarding the endpoints surgical site infection (SSI), fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia, no risk factor after MI, TI, and MMI could be detected in statistical analysis. There was no difference regarding the occurrence of fascial dehiscence (P = .58) or incisional hernia (P = .97) between MI, TI, and MMI. In cases of relaparotomies, the incidence of fascial dehiscence (P = .2) or incisional hernia (P = .58) did not significantly differ between the MI, TI, or MMI as well as between primary and reincision of each type. On the other hand, the time to first appearance of a hernia after MMI is significantly shorter (P = .03) than after MI or TI, even after previous laparotomy (P = .003). In comparing the 3 most common types of abdominal incisions and ignoring the type of operative procedure performed, TI seems to be the least complicated approach. However, because the incidence of fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia is not relevantly increased, the stability of the abdominal wall is apparently not affected by relaparotomy, even by repeated MIs, TIs, and MMIs. Therefore, the type of laparotomy, especially a relaparotomy, can be chosen based on the surgeon's preference and planned procedure without worrying about increased wound complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81370632021-05-25 Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients Hempel, Sebastian Kalauch, Anne Oehme, Florian Wolk, Steffen Welsch, Thilo Weitz, Jürgen Distler, Marius Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 There are 3 main types of incisions in major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline incision (MI), the transverse incision (TI) and the modified Makuuchi incision (MMI). This study aimed to compare these approaches regarding wound complications and hernias, with a special focus on suture material and previous laparotomies. Patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2015 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were computed using stepwise binary and multifactorial regression models. In total, 696 patients (406 MI, 137 TI and 153 MMI) were included. No relevant differences were observed for patient characteristics (e.g., sex, age, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score). Fewer wound complications (TI 22.6% vs MI 33.5% vs MMI 32.7%, P = .04) occurred in the TI group. However, regarding the endpoints surgical site infection (SSI), fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia, no risk factor after MI, TI, and MMI could be detected in statistical analysis. There was no difference regarding the occurrence of fascial dehiscence (P = .58) or incisional hernia (P = .97) between MI, TI, and MMI. In cases of relaparotomies, the incidence of fascial dehiscence (P = .2) or incisional hernia (P = .58) did not significantly differ between the MI, TI, or MMI as well as between primary and reincision of each type. On the other hand, the time to first appearance of a hernia after MMI is significantly shorter (P = .03) than after MI or TI, even after previous laparotomy (P = .003). In comparing the 3 most common types of abdominal incisions and ignoring the type of operative procedure performed, TI seems to be the least complicated approach. However, because the incidence of fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia is not relevantly increased, the stability of the abdominal wall is apparently not affected by relaparotomy, even by repeated MIs, TIs, and MMIs. Therefore, the type of laparotomy, especially a relaparotomy, can be chosen based on the surgeon's preference and planned procedure without worrying about increased wound complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8137063/ /pubmed/34011091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025989 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Hempel, Sebastian
Kalauch, Anne
Oehme, Florian
Wolk, Steffen
Welsch, Thilo
Weitz, Jürgen
Distler, Marius
Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
title Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
title_full Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
title_fullStr Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
title_full_unstemmed Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
title_short Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
title_sort wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified makuuchi incision: a single-center experience in 696 patients
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025989
work_keys_str_mv AT hempelsebastian woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients
AT kalauchanne woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients
AT oehmeflorian woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients
AT wolksteffen woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients
AT welschthilo woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients
AT weitzjurgen woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients
AT distlermarius woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients