Cargando…
Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients
There are 3 main types of incisions in major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline incision (MI), the transverse incision (TI) and the modified Makuuchi incision (MMI). This study aimed to compare these approaches regarding wound complications and hernias, with a special focus on suture mate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025989 |
_version_ | 1783695551694372864 |
---|---|
author | Hempel, Sebastian Kalauch, Anne Oehme, Florian Wolk, Steffen Welsch, Thilo Weitz, Jürgen Distler, Marius |
author_facet | Hempel, Sebastian Kalauch, Anne Oehme, Florian Wolk, Steffen Welsch, Thilo Weitz, Jürgen Distler, Marius |
author_sort | Hempel, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are 3 main types of incisions in major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline incision (MI), the transverse incision (TI) and the modified Makuuchi incision (MMI). This study aimed to compare these approaches regarding wound complications and hernias, with a special focus on suture material and previous laparotomies. Patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2015 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were computed using stepwise binary and multifactorial regression models. In total, 696 patients (406 MI, 137 TI and 153 MMI) were included. No relevant differences were observed for patient characteristics (e.g., sex, age, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score). Fewer wound complications (TI 22.6% vs MI 33.5% vs MMI 32.7%, P = .04) occurred in the TI group. However, regarding the endpoints surgical site infection (SSI), fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia, no risk factor after MI, TI, and MMI could be detected in statistical analysis. There was no difference regarding the occurrence of fascial dehiscence (P = .58) or incisional hernia (P = .97) between MI, TI, and MMI. In cases of relaparotomies, the incidence of fascial dehiscence (P = .2) or incisional hernia (P = .58) did not significantly differ between the MI, TI, or MMI as well as between primary and reincision of each type. On the other hand, the time to first appearance of a hernia after MMI is significantly shorter (P = .03) than after MI or TI, even after previous laparotomy (P = .003). In comparing the 3 most common types of abdominal incisions and ignoring the type of operative procedure performed, TI seems to be the least complicated approach. However, because the incidence of fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia is not relevantly increased, the stability of the abdominal wall is apparently not affected by relaparotomy, even by repeated MIs, TIs, and MMIs. Therefore, the type of laparotomy, especially a relaparotomy, can be chosen based on the surgeon's preference and planned procedure without worrying about increased wound complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8137063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81370632021-05-25 Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients Hempel, Sebastian Kalauch, Anne Oehme, Florian Wolk, Steffen Welsch, Thilo Weitz, Jürgen Distler, Marius Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 There are 3 main types of incisions in major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline incision (MI), the transverse incision (TI) and the modified Makuuchi incision (MMI). This study aimed to compare these approaches regarding wound complications and hernias, with a special focus on suture material and previous laparotomies. Patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2015 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were computed using stepwise binary and multifactorial regression models. In total, 696 patients (406 MI, 137 TI and 153 MMI) were included. No relevant differences were observed for patient characteristics (e.g., sex, age, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score). Fewer wound complications (TI 22.6% vs MI 33.5% vs MMI 32.7%, P = .04) occurred in the TI group. However, regarding the endpoints surgical site infection (SSI), fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia, no risk factor after MI, TI, and MMI could be detected in statistical analysis. There was no difference regarding the occurrence of fascial dehiscence (P = .58) or incisional hernia (P = .97) between MI, TI, and MMI. In cases of relaparotomies, the incidence of fascial dehiscence (P = .2) or incisional hernia (P = .58) did not significantly differ between the MI, TI, or MMI as well as between primary and reincision of each type. On the other hand, the time to first appearance of a hernia after MMI is significantly shorter (P = .03) than after MI or TI, even after previous laparotomy (P = .003). In comparing the 3 most common types of abdominal incisions and ignoring the type of operative procedure performed, TI seems to be the least complicated approach. However, because the incidence of fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia is not relevantly increased, the stability of the abdominal wall is apparently not affected by relaparotomy, even by repeated MIs, TIs, and MMIs. Therefore, the type of laparotomy, especially a relaparotomy, can be chosen based on the surgeon's preference and planned procedure without worrying about increased wound complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8137063/ /pubmed/34011091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025989 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7100 Hempel, Sebastian Kalauch, Anne Oehme, Florian Wolk, Steffen Welsch, Thilo Weitz, Jürgen Distler, Marius Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients |
title | Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients |
title_full | Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients |
title_fullStr | Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients |
title_short | Wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified Makuuchi incision: A single-center experience in 696 patients |
title_sort | wound complications after primary and repeated midline, transverse and modified makuuchi incision: a single-center experience in 696 patients |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hempelsebastian woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients AT kalauchanne woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients AT oehmeflorian woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients AT wolksteffen woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients AT welschthilo woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients AT weitzjurgen woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients AT distlermarius woundcomplicationsafterprimaryandrepeatedmidlinetransverseandmodifiedmakuuchiincisionasinglecenterexperiencein696patients |