Cargando…
Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan
OBJECTIVES: Little has been reported on the yield and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia detected by the two-sample faecal immunochemical test (FIT), particularly the difference between subjects with two-positive results on the two-sample FIT and those with one-positive results. We aimed to ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046055 |
_version_ | 1783695567655796736 |
---|---|
author | Toyoshima, Osamu Yamaji, Yutaka Nishizawa, Toshihiro Yoshida, Shuntaro Yamada, Tomoharu Kurokawa, Ken Obata, Miho Kondo, Ryo Toba, Masahito Koike, Kazuhiko |
author_facet | Toyoshima, Osamu Yamaji, Yutaka Nishizawa, Toshihiro Yoshida, Shuntaro Yamada, Tomoharu Kurokawa, Ken Obata, Miho Kondo, Ryo Toba, Masahito Koike, Kazuhiko |
author_sort | Toyoshima, Osamu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Little has been reported on the yield and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia detected by the two-sample faecal immunochemical test (FIT), particularly the difference between subjects with two-positive results on the two-sample FIT and those with one-positive results. We aimed to assess risk stratification among patients with positive two-sample FIT to prioritise colonoscopy. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: A single-centre, representative endoscopy clinic in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled. Indications for colonoscopy included two-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/+)), one-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/−)), and other reasons (non-FIT group, including presence of symptoms, screening or surveillance). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were detection rates of colorectal cancers, including in situ (all cancers) and invasive cancers, based on the indications for colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were cancer features, such as location, size, T stage and histological subtype. RESULTS: Of the 8724 patients, 264 underwent colonoscopy following FIT (+/+), 1018 following FIT (+/−) and 7442 for reasons other than positive FIT. Detection rates of all (and invasive) cancers in the FIT (+/+), FIT (+/−) and non-FIT groups were 12.1% (8.3%), 1.9% (0.3%) and 0.4% (0.2%), respectively. The cancer detection rates were much higher in the FIT (+/+) group than in the FIT (+/−) group, which in turn had higher rates than the non-FIT group. Moreover, the FIT (+/+) group showed more advanced T stages on tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification (Tis/T1/T2/T3/T4: 10/7/4/10/1) than the FIT (+/−) group (16/1/2/0/0, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Two-positive results for two-sample FIT showed a much higher yield for more advanced colorectal cancers than the one-positive result. High priority for diagnostic colonoscopy should be assigned to patients with two-positive-FIT results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8137156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81371562021-06-01 Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan Toyoshima, Osamu Yamaji, Yutaka Nishizawa, Toshihiro Yoshida, Shuntaro Yamada, Tomoharu Kurokawa, Ken Obata, Miho Kondo, Ryo Toba, Masahito Koike, Kazuhiko BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: Little has been reported on the yield and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia detected by the two-sample faecal immunochemical test (FIT), particularly the difference between subjects with two-positive results on the two-sample FIT and those with one-positive results. We aimed to assess risk stratification among patients with positive two-sample FIT to prioritise colonoscopy. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: A single-centre, representative endoscopy clinic in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled. Indications for colonoscopy included two-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/+)), one-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/−)), and other reasons (non-FIT group, including presence of symptoms, screening or surveillance). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were detection rates of colorectal cancers, including in situ (all cancers) and invasive cancers, based on the indications for colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were cancer features, such as location, size, T stage and histological subtype. RESULTS: Of the 8724 patients, 264 underwent colonoscopy following FIT (+/+), 1018 following FIT (+/−) and 7442 for reasons other than positive FIT. Detection rates of all (and invasive) cancers in the FIT (+/+), FIT (+/−) and non-FIT groups were 12.1% (8.3%), 1.9% (0.3%) and 0.4% (0.2%), respectively. The cancer detection rates were much higher in the FIT (+/+) group than in the FIT (+/−) group, which in turn had higher rates than the non-FIT group. Moreover, the FIT (+/+) group showed more advanced T stages on tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification (Tis/T1/T2/T3/T4: 10/7/4/10/1) than the FIT (+/−) group (16/1/2/0/0, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Two-positive results for two-sample FIT showed a much higher yield for more advanced colorectal cancers than the one-positive result. High priority for diagnostic colonoscopy should be assigned to patients with two-positive-FIT results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8137156/ /pubmed/34011594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046055 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Toyoshima, Osamu Yamaji, Yutaka Nishizawa, Toshihiro Yoshida, Shuntaro Yamada, Tomoharu Kurokawa, Ken Obata, Miho Kondo, Ryo Toba, Masahito Koike, Kazuhiko Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan |
title | Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan |
title_full | Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan |
title_fullStr | Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan |
title_short | Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan |
title_sort | priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in japan |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toyoshimaosamu prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT yamajiyutaka prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT nishizawatoshihiro prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT yoshidashuntaro prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT yamadatomoharu prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT kurokawaken prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT obatamiho prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT kondoryo prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT tobamasahito prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan AT koikekazuhiko prioritystratificationforcolonoscopybasedontwosamplefaecalimmunochemicaltestscreeningresultsfromacrosssectionalstudyatanendoscopyclinicinjapan |