Cargando…

Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES: Patient-generated data (PGData) are an emergent research area and may improve HIV care. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesise, evaluate and make recommendations based on the available literature regarding PGData use in HIV care. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hewitt, Clara, Lloyd, Karen C, Tariq, Shema, Durrant, Abigail, Claisse, Caroline, Kasadha, Bakita, Gibbs, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046393
_version_ 1783695578116390912
author Hewitt, Clara
Lloyd, Karen C
Tariq, Shema
Durrant, Abigail
Claisse, Caroline
Kasadha, Bakita
Gibbs, Jo
author_facet Hewitt, Clara
Lloyd, Karen C
Tariq, Shema
Durrant, Abigail
Claisse, Caroline
Kasadha, Bakita
Gibbs, Jo
author_sort Hewitt, Clara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient-generated data (PGData) are an emergent research area and may improve HIV care. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesise, evaluate and make recommendations based on the available literature regarding PGData use in HIV care. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Emcare databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies involving PGData use within HIV care for people living with HIV and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs) published before February 2021. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a table and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess empirical rigour. We used thematic analysis to evaluate content. RESULTS: 11 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were observational, predominantly concerned hypothetical or novel digital platforms, mainly conducted in high-income settings, and had small sample sizes (range=10–160). There were multiple definitions of PGData. In the majority of studies (n=9), participants were people living with HIV, with a few studies including HCPs, informatics specialists or mixed participant groups. Participants living with HIV were aged 23–78 years, mostly men, of diverse ethnicities, and had low educational, health literacy and income levels. We identified four key themes: (1) Perceptions of PGData and associated digital platforms; (2) Opportunities; (3) Anticipated barriers and (4) Potential impact on patient–HCP relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Use of PGData within HIV care warrants further study, especially with regard to digital inequalities, data privacy and security. There is a need for longitudinal data on use within HIV in a variety of settings with a broad range of users, including impact on clinical outcomes. This will allow greater understanding of the role of PGData use in improving the health and well-being of people living with HIV, which is increasingly pertinent as digital healthcare becomes more widespread as a result of COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81372192021-06-01 Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review Hewitt, Clara Lloyd, Karen C Tariq, Shema Durrant, Abigail Claisse, Caroline Kasadha, Bakita Gibbs, Jo BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVES: Patient-generated data (PGData) are an emergent research area and may improve HIV care. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesise, evaluate and make recommendations based on the available literature regarding PGData use in HIV care. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Emcare databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies involving PGData use within HIV care for people living with HIV and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs) published before February 2021. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a table and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess empirical rigour. We used thematic analysis to evaluate content. RESULTS: 11 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were observational, predominantly concerned hypothetical or novel digital platforms, mainly conducted in high-income settings, and had small sample sizes (range=10–160). There were multiple definitions of PGData. In the majority of studies (n=9), participants were people living with HIV, with a few studies including HCPs, informatics specialists or mixed participant groups. Participants living with HIV were aged 23–78 years, mostly men, of diverse ethnicities, and had low educational, health literacy and income levels. We identified four key themes: (1) Perceptions of PGData and associated digital platforms; (2) Opportunities; (3) Anticipated barriers and (4) Potential impact on patient–HCP relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Use of PGData within HIV care warrants further study, especially with regard to digital inequalities, data privacy and security. There is a need for longitudinal data on use within HIV in a variety of settings with a broad range of users, including impact on clinical outcomes. This will allow greater understanding of the role of PGData use in improving the health and well-being of people living with HIV, which is increasingly pertinent as digital healthcare becomes more widespread as a result of COVID-19. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8137219/ /pubmed/34011598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046393 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Hewitt, Clara
Lloyd, Karen C
Tariq, Shema
Durrant, Abigail
Claisse, Caroline
Kasadha, Bakita
Gibbs, Jo
Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review
title Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review
title_full Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review
title_fullStr Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review
title_short Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review
title_sort patient-generated data in the management of hiv: a scoping review
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046393
work_keys_str_mv AT hewittclara patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview
AT lloydkarenc patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview
AT tariqshema patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview
AT durrantabigail patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview
AT claissecaroline patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview
AT kasadhabakita patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview
AT gibbsjo patientgenerateddatainthemanagementofhivascopingreview