Cargando…

Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia

INTRODUCTION: The burden of injury in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has increased in recent years, but the country has lacked a consistent methodology for collecting injury data. A trauma registry has been established at a large public hospital in Riyadh from which these data are now available....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsenani, Mohammad, A Alaklobi, Faisal, Ford, Jane, Earnest, Arul, Hashem, Waleed, Chowdhury, Sharfuddin, Alenezi, Ahmed, Fitzgerald, Mark, Cameron, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045902
_version_ 1783695583975833600
author Alsenani, Mohammad
A Alaklobi, Faisal
Ford, Jane
Earnest, Arul
Hashem, Waleed
Chowdhury, Sharfuddin
Alenezi, Ahmed
Fitzgerald, Mark
Cameron, Peter
author_facet Alsenani, Mohammad
A Alaklobi, Faisal
Ford, Jane
Earnest, Arul
Hashem, Waleed
Chowdhury, Sharfuddin
Alenezi, Ahmed
Fitzgerald, Mark
Cameron, Peter
author_sort Alsenani, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The burden of injury in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has increased in recent years, but the country has lacked a consistent methodology for collecting injury data. A trauma registry has been established at a large public hospital in Riyadh from which these data are now available. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide an overview of trauma epidemiology by reviewing the first calendar year of data collection for the registry. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed to benchmark outcomes with a large Australian major trauma service in Melbourne. The findings are the first to report the trauma profile from a centre in the KSA and compare outcomes with an international level I trauma centre. METHODS: This was an observational study using records with injury dates in 2018 from the registries at both hospitals. Demographics, processes and outcomes were extracted, as were baseline characteristics. Risk-adjusted endpoints were inpatient mortality and length of stay. Binary logistic regression was used to measure the association between site and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2436 and 4069 records were registered on the Riyadh and Melbourne databases, respectively. There were proportionally more men in the Saudi cohort than the Australian cohort (86% to 69%). The Saudi cohort was younger, the median age being 36 years compared with 50 years, with 51% of injuries caused by road traffic incidents. The risk-adjusted length of stay was 4.4 days less at the Melbourne hospital (95% CI 3.95 days to 4.86 days, p<0.001). The odds of in-hospital death were also less (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.43, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first hospital-based study of trauma in the kingdom that benchmarks with an individual international centre. There are limitations to interpreting the comparisons, however the findings have established a baseline for measuring continuous improvement in outcomes for KSA trauma services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81372522021-06-01 Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia Alsenani, Mohammad A Alaklobi, Faisal Ford, Jane Earnest, Arul Hashem, Waleed Chowdhury, Sharfuddin Alenezi, Ahmed Fitzgerald, Mark Cameron, Peter BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: The burden of injury in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has increased in recent years, but the country has lacked a consistent methodology for collecting injury data. A trauma registry has been established at a large public hospital in Riyadh from which these data are now available. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide an overview of trauma epidemiology by reviewing the first calendar year of data collection for the registry. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed to benchmark outcomes with a large Australian major trauma service in Melbourne. The findings are the first to report the trauma profile from a centre in the KSA and compare outcomes with an international level I trauma centre. METHODS: This was an observational study using records with injury dates in 2018 from the registries at both hospitals. Demographics, processes and outcomes were extracted, as were baseline characteristics. Risk-adjusted endpoints were inpatient mortality and length of stay. Binary logistic regression was used to measure the association between site and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2436 and 4069 records were registered on the Riyadh and Melbourne databases, respectively. There were proportionally more men in the Saudi cohort than the Australian cohort (86% to 69%). The Saudi cohort was younger, the median age being 36 years compared with 50 years, with 51% of injuries caused by road traffic incidents. The risk-adjusted length of stay was 4.4 days less at the Melbourne hospital (95% CI 3.95 days to 4.86 days, p<0.001). The odds of in-hospital death were also less (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.43, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first hospital-based study of trauma in the kingdom that benchmarks with an individual international centre. There are limitations to interpreting the comparisons, however the findings have established a baseline for measuring continuous improvement in outcomes for KSA trauma services. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8137252/ /pubmed/34006550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045902 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Alsenani, Mohammad
A Alaklobi, Faisal
Ford, Jane
Earnest, Arul
Hashem, Waleed
Chowdhury, Sharfuddin
Alenezi, Ahmed
Fitzgerald, Mark
Cameron, Peter
Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia
title Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia
title_full Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia
title_fullStr Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia
title_short Comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia
title_sort comparison of trauma management between two major trauma services in riyadh, kingdom of saudi arabia and melbourne, australia
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045902
work_keys_str_mv AT alsenanimohammad comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT aalaklobifaisal comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT fordjane comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT earnestarul comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT hashemwaleed comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT chowdhurysharfuddin comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT aleneziahmed comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT fitzgeraldmark comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia
AT cameronpeter comparisonoftraumamanagementbetweentwomajortraumaservicesinriyadhkingdomofsaudiarabiaandmelbourneaustralia