Cargando…

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Improves Subnetwork Interactions in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND: Activating vestibular afferents via galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) has been recently shown to have a number of complex motor effects in Parkinson's disease (PD), but the basis of these improvements is unclear. The evaluation of network-level connectivity changes may provide u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Aiping, Bi, Huiling, Li, Yu, Lee, Soojin, Cai, Jiayue, Mi, Taomian, Garg, Saurabh, Kim, Jowon L., Zhu, Maria, Chen, Xun, Wang, Z. Jane, McKeown, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6632394
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Activating vestibular afferents via galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) has been recently shown to have a number of complex motor effects in Parkinson's disease (PD), but the basis of these improvements is unclear. The evaluation of network-level connectivity changes may provide us with greater insights into the mechanisms of GVS efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of different GVS stimuli on brain subnetwork interactions in both health control (HC) and PD groups using fMRI. METHODS: FMRI data were collected for all participants at baseline (resting state) and under noisy, 1 Hz sinusoidal, and 70-200 Hz multisine GVS. All stimuli were given below sensory threshold, blinding subjects to stimulation. The subnetworks of 15 healthy controls and 27 PD subjects (on medication) were identified in their native space, and their subnetwork interactions were estimated by nonnegative canonical correlation analysis. We then determined if the inferred subnetwork interaction changes were affected by disease and stimulus type and if the stimulus-dependent GVS effects were influenced by demographic features. RESULTS: At baseline, interactions with the visual-cerebellar network were significantly decreased in the PD group. Sinusoidal and multisine GVS improved (i.e., made values approaching those seen in HC) subnetwork interactions more effectively than noisy GVS stimuli overall. Worsening disease severity, apathy, depression, impaired cognitive function, and increasing age all limited the beneficial effects of GVS. CONCLUSIONS: Vestibular stimulation has widespread system-level brain influences and can improve subnetwork interactions in PD in a stimulus-dependent manner, with the magnitude of such effects associating with demographics and disease status.