Cargando…
The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: To systematically translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) into a Korean version of the FMA (K-FMA). METHODS: We translated the original FMA into the Korean version with three translators and a translation committee, which included physiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational ther...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849084 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.20225 |
_version_ | 1783695613661020160 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Tae-lim Hwang, Sung Hwan Lee, Wang Jae Hwang, Jae Woong Cho, Inyong Kim, Eun-Hye Lee, Jung Ah Choi, Yujin Park, Jin Ho Shin, Joon-Ho |
author_facet | Kim, Tae-lim Hwang, Sung Hwan Lee, Wang Jae Hwang, Jae Woong Cho, Inyong Kim, Eun-Hye Lee, Jung Ah Choi, Yujin Park, Jin Ho Shin, Joon-Ho |
author_sort | Kim, Tae-lim |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To systematically translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) into a Korean version of the FMA (K-FMA). METHODS: We translated the original FMA into the Korean version with three translators and a translation committee, which included physiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. Based on a test-retest method, each of 31 patients with stroke was assessed by two evaluators twice, once on recruitment, and again after a week. Analysis of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities was performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient, whereas validity was analysed using Pearson correlation test along with the Motricity Index (MI), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). RESULTS: The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were significant for the total score, and good to excellent reliability was noted in all domains except for the joint range of motion of the lower extremity domain of the K-FMA. The MI and MAS scores were significantly correlated with all domains, all with p<0.01. The results for the MI ranged from r=0.639 to r=0.891 and those for the MAS from r=0.339 to r=0.555. However, the BBS was not significantly correlated with any domain, as the K-FMA lacks balance evaluation items. CONCLUSION: The K-FMA was found to have high reliability and validity. Additionally, the newly developed manual for the K-FMA may help minimise errors that can occur during evaluation and improve the reliability of motor function evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8137384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81373842021-05-28 The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation Kim, Tae-lim Hwang, Sung Hwan Lee, Wang Jae Hwang, Jae Woong Cho, Inyong Kim, Eun-Hye Lee, Jung Ah Choi, Yujin Park, Jin Ho Shin, Joon-Ho Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To systematically translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) into a Korean version of the FMA (K-FMA). METHODS: We translated the original FMA into the Korean version with three translators and a translation committee, which included physiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. Based on a test-retest method, each of 31 patients with stroke was assessed by two evaluators twice, once on recruitment, and again after a week. Analysis of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities was performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient, whereas validity was analysed using Pearson correlation test along with the Motricity Index (MI), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). RESULTS: The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were significant for the total score, and good to excellent reliability was noted in all domains except for the joint range of motion of the lower extremity domain of the K-FMA. The MI and MAS scores were significantly correlated with all domains, all with p<0.01. The results for the MI ranged from r=0.639 to r=0.891 and those for the MAS from r=0.339 to r=0.555. However, the BBS was not significantly correlated with any domain, as the K-FMA lacks balance evaluation items. CONCLUSION: The K-FMA was found to have high reliability and validity. Additionally, the newly developed manual for the K-FMA may help minimise errors that can occur during evaluation and improve the reliability of motor function evaluation. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2021-04 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8137384/ /pubmed/33849084 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.20225 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Tae-lim Hwang, Sung Hwan Lee, Wang Jae Hwang, Jae Woong Cho, Inyong Kim, Eun-Hye Lee, Jung Ah Choi, Yujin Park, Jin Ho Shin, Joon-Ho The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title | The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_full | The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_fullStr | The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_short | The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_sort | korean version of the fugl-meyer assessment: reliability and validity evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849084 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.20225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimtaelim thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT hwangsunghwan thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT leewangjae thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT hwangjaewoong thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT choinyong thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT kimeunhye thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT leejungah thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT choiyujin thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT parkjinho thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT shinjoonho thekoreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT kimtaelim koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT hwangsunghwan koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT leewangjae koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT hwangjaewoong koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT choinyong koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT kimeunhye koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT leejungah koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT choiyujin koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT parkjinho koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT shinjoonho koreanversionofthefuglmeyerassessmentreliabilityandvalidityevaluation |