Cargando…

Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services

BACKGROUND: While generic, site, and disease-specific patient experience surveys exist, such surveys have limited relevance to frail, medically complex older adults attending appointment-based specialized geriatric services (SGS). The study objective was to develop and evaluate a patient experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilsenan, Ronaye, Schwartz, Rhonda, Gutmanis, Iris A., Day, Adam M.B., Ryan, David P., Brander, Rosemary R.A., Milne, Kelly, Molnar, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Geriatrics Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079603
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.487
_version_ 1783695631743713280
author Gilsenan, Ronaye
Schwartz, Rhonda
Gutmanis, Iris A.
Day, Adam M.B.
Ryan, David P.
Brander, Rosemary R.A.
Milne, Kelly
Molnar, Frank
author_facet Gilsenan, Ronaye
Schwartz, Rhonda
Gutmanis, Iris A.
Day, Adam M.B.
Ryan, David P.
Brander, Rosemary R.A.
Milne, Kelly
Molnar, Frank
author_sort Gilsenan, Ronaye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While generic, site, and disease-specific patient experience surveys exist, such surveys have limited relevance to frail, medically complex older adults attending appointment-based specialized geriatric services (SGS). The study objective was to develop and evaluate a patient experience survey specific to this population. METHODS: Using established survey research methods, this study was conducted collaboratively with older adults (patients and family members/friends) at three Ontario sites offering SGS. The study was done in three phases: Phase One—literature review, evidence alignment, and operationalization of core survey items; Phase Two—cognitive interviews and refinement; and Phase Three—pilot testing, survey item analysis, and refinement. RESULTS: Based on an evidence-informed framework, the “Older Adult Experience Survey” includes 12 core items, two global rating items, two open-ended questions, and two demographic questions. The summed 12 core items demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.83), and the correlation between the summed score and a global question was 0.59, providing evidence of construct validity. The survey also demonstrated face and content validity. CONCLUSION: This open access, collaboratively developed, psychometrically sound patient experience survey can be used to assess, then improve, the clinical experience and quality of care of older adults attending appointment-based SGS clinics/programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Canadian Geriatrics Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81374622021-06-01 Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services Gilsenan, Ronaye Schwartz, Rhonda Gutmanis, Iris A. Day, Adam M.B. Ryan, David P. Brander, Rosemary R.A. Milne, Kelly Molnar, Frank Can Geriatr J Original Research BACKGROUND: While generic, site, and disease-specific patient experience surveys exist, such surveys have limited relevance to frail, medically complex older adults attending appointment-based specialized geriatric services (SGS). The study objective was to develop and evaluate a patient experience survey specific to this population. METHODS: Using established survey research methods, this study was conducted collaboratively with older adults (patients and family members/friends) at three Ontario sites offering SGS. The study was done in three phases: Phase One—literature review, evidence alignment, and operationalization of core survey items; Phase Two—cognitive interviews and refinement; and Phase Three—pilot testing, survey item analysis, and refinement. RESULTS: Based on an evidence-informed framework, the “Older Adult Experience Survey” includes 12 core items, two global rating items, two open-ended questions, and two demographic questions. The summed 12 core items demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.83), and the correlation between the summed score and a global question was 0.59, providing evidence of construct validity. The survey also demonstrated face and content validity. CONCLUSION: This open access, collaboratively developed, psychometrically sound patient experience survey can be used to assess, then improve, the clinical experience and quality of care of older adults attending appointment-based SGS clinics/programs. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8137462/ /pubmed/34079603 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.487 Text en © 2021 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gilsenan, Ronaye
Schwartz, Rhonda
Gutmanis, Iris A.
Day, Adam M.B.
Ryan, David P.
Brander, Rosemary R.A.
Milne, Kelly
Molnar, Frank
Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services
title Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services
title_full Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services
title_fullStr Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services
title_short Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services
title_sort collaborative development of an older adult experience survey for specialized geriatric services
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079603
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.487
work_keys_str_mv AT gilsenanronaye collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT schwartzrhonda collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT gutmanisirisa collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT dayadammb collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT ryandavidp collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT branderrosemaryra collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT milnekelly collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices
AT molnarfrank collaborativedevelopmentofanolderadultexperiencesurveyforspecializedgeriatricservices