Cargando…
Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP?
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition causing unrefreshing sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. It has individual socioeconomic impacts and, through association with increased risk of road traffic accidents, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, OSA is a public health issue. Cont...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00137-2 |
_version_ | 1783695671182753792 |
---|---|
author | Francis, Claire E. Quinnell, Tim |
author_facet | Francis, Claire E. Quinnell, Tim |
author_sort | Francis, Claire E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition causing unrefreshing sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. It has individual socioeconomic impacts and, through association with increased risk of road traffic accidents, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, OSA is a public health issue. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe OSA. It is effective in improving excessive daytime sleepiness and quality of life. There is also evidence that CPAP therapy has cardiovascular benefits although nature and extent remain uncertain. Despite its benefits, a significant proportion of patients are unable to tolerate CPAP. There are also patients with mild but symptomatic disease, for whom CPAP is usually not available or appropriate, so there is a need for other treatment options. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) offer an effective alternative to CPAP and can improve daytime symptoms and quality of life. There are many devices available, representing a range of complexity and cost. It is challenging to properly evaluate the effectiveness of this ever-evolving range. The more basic MADs are cheaper and more accessible but are less well tolerated. More complex devices are better tolerated and may be more effective. However, they are more expensive and often require dental expertise, so access is more limited. Efforts continue to try to improve accessibility to effective MAD therapy. Alongside increasing awareness, this may be facilitated by developing and refining devices that could be fitted by non-dental clinicians, and potentially by patients themselves. Research efforts need to focus on determining how to efficiently identify patients who are likely to respond to MAD therapy, so as to improve clinical and cost-effectiveness of OSA therapy overall. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8137783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81377832021-06-03 Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? Francis, Claire E. Quinnell, Tim Pulm Ther Review Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition causing unrefreshing sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. It has individual socioeconomic impacts and, through association with increased risk of road traffic accidents, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, OSA is a public health issue. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe OSA. It is effective in improving excessive daytime sleepiness and quality of life. There is also evidence that CPAP therapy has cardiovascular benefits although nature and extent remain uncertain. Despite its benefits, a significant proportion of patients are unable to tolerate CPAP. There are also patients with mild but symptomatic disease, for whom CPAP is usually not available or appropriate, so there is a need for other treatment options. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) offer an effective alternative to CPAP and can improve daytime symptoms and quality of life. There are many devices available, representing a range of complexity and cost. It is challenging to properly evaluate the effectiveness of this ever-evolving range. The more basic MADs are cheaper and more accessible but are less well tolerated. More complex devices are better tolerated and may be more effective. However, they are more expensive and often require dental expertise, so access is more limited. Efforts continue to try to improve accessibility to effective MAD therapy. Alongside increasing awareness, this may be facilitated by developing and refining devices that could be fitted by non-dental clinicians, and potentially by patients themselves. Research efforts need to focus on determining how to efficiently identify patients who are likely to respond to MAD therapy, so as to improve clinical and cost-effectiveness of OSA therapy overall. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8137783/ /pubmed/33170490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00137-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Francis, Claire E. Quinnell, Tim Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? |
title | Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? |
title_full | Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? |
title_fullStr | Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? |
title_full_unstemmed | Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? |
title_short | Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP? |
title_sort | mandibular advancement devices for osa: an alternative to cpap? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00137-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francisclairee mandibularadvancementdevicesforosaanalternativetocpap AT quinnelltim mandibularadvancementdevicesforosaanalternativetocpap |