Cargando…

Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was the evaluation of initial biofilm adhesion and development on laser-microtextured implant collar surfaces and the examination of effectivity of different biofilm management methods. METHODS: Initial biofilm formation was investigated on hydrophobic machin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John, Gordon, Schwarz, Frank, Kravchenko, Alexandra, Ommerborn, Michelle Alicia, Becker, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34018065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00326-x
_version_ 1783695671886348288
author John, Gordon
Schwarz, Frank
Kravchenko, Alexandra
Ommerborn, Michelle Alicia
Becker, Jürgen
author_facet John, Gordon
Schwarz, Frank
Kravchenko, Alexandra
Ommerborn, Michelle Alicia
Becker, Jürgen
author_sort John, Gordon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was the evaluation of initial biofilm adhesion and development on laser-microtextured implant collar surfaces and the examination of effectivity of different biofilm management methods. METHODS: Initial biofilm formation was investigated on hydrophobic machined and laser-microtextured (Laser-Lok) titanium surfaces and hydrophobic machined and laser-microtextured (Laser-Lok) titanium aluminium vanadium surfaces and compared to hydrophobic smooth pickled titanium surfaces, hydrophilic smooth and acid etched titanium surfaces, hydrophobic sandblasted large grid and acid etched titanium surfaces (titanium Promote) via erythrosine staining and subsequent histomorphometrical analysis and scanning electron microscopic investigations. After decontamination procedures, performed via tooth brushing and glycine powder blasting, clean implant surface was detected via histomorphometrical analysis. RESULTS: After 24 h mean initial plaque area was detected in the following descending order: smooth pickled titanium > titanium Promote > hydrophilic smooth and acid etched titanium > Laser-Lok titanium > Laser-Lok titanium aluminium vanadium. The same order was determined after 48 h of biofilm formation. After glycine powder blasting all samples depicted almost 100% clean implant surface. After tooth brushing, Laser-Lok titanium (67.19%) and Laser-Lok titanium aluminium vanadium (69.80%) showed significantly more clean implant surface than the other structured surfaces, hydrophilic smooth and acid etched titanium (50.34%) and titanium Promote (33.89%). Smooth pickled titanium showed almost complete clean implant surface (98.84%) after tooth brushing. CONCLUSIONS: Both Laser-Lok surfaces showed less initial biofilm formation after 24 and 48 h than the other implant surfaces. In combination with the significant higher clean implant surfaces after domestic decontamination procedure via tooth brushing, both Laser-Lok surfaces could be a candidate for modified implant and abutment designs, especially in transmucosal areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81377872021-06-03 Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model John, Gordon Schwarz, Frank Kravchenko, Alexandra Ommerborn, Michelle Alicia Becker, Jürgen Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was the evaluation of initial biofilm adhesion and development on laser-microtextured implant collar surfaces and the examination of effectivity of different biofilm management methods. METHODS: Initial biofilm formation was investigated on hydrophobic machined and laser-microtextured (Laser-Lok) titanium surfaces and hydrophobic machined and laser-microtextured (Laser-Lok) titanium aluminium vanadium surfaces and compared to hydrophobic smooth pickled titanium surfaces, hydrophilic smooth and acid etched titanium surfaces, hydrophobic sandblasted large grid and acid etched titanium surfaces (titanium Promote) via erythrosine staining and subsequent histomorphometrical analysis and scanning electron microscopic investigations. After decontamination procedures, performed via tooth brushing and glycine powder blasting, clean implant surface was detected via histomorphometrical analysis. RESULTS: After 24 h mean initial plaque area was detected in the following descending order: smooth pickled titanium > titanium Promote > hydrophilic smooth and acid etched titanium > Laser-Lok titanium > Laser-Lok titanium aluminium vanadium. The same order was determined after 48 h of biofilm formation. After glycine powder blasting all samples depicted almost 100% clean implant surface. After tooth brushing, Laser-Lok titanium (67.19%) and Laser-Lok titanium aluminium vanadium (69.80%) showed significantly more clean implant surface than the other structured surfaces, hydrophilic smooth and acid etched titanium (50.34%) and titanium Promote (33.89%). Smooth pickled titanium showed almost complete clean implant surface (98.84%) after tooth brushing. CONCLUSIONS: Both Laser-Lok surfaces showed less initial biofilm formation after 24 and 48 h than the other implant surfaces. In combination with the significant higher clean implant surfaces after domestic decontamination procedure via tooth brushing, both Laser-Lok surfaces could be a candidate for modified implant and abutment designs, especially in transmucosal areas. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8137787/ /pubmed/34018065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00326-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
John, Gordon
Schwarz, Frank
Kravchenko, Alexandra
Ommerborn, Michelle Alicia
Becker, Jürgen
Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
title Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
title_full Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
title_fullStr Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
title_full_unstemmed Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
title_short Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
title_sort effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34018065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00326-x
work_keys_str_mv AT johngordon effectivityofhomecareandprofessionalbiofilmremovalproceduresoninitialsupragingivalbiofilmonlasermicrotexturedimplantsurfacesinanexvivomodel
AT schwarzfrank effectivityofhomecareandprofessionalbiofilmremovalproceduresoninitialsupragingivalbiofilmonlasermicrotexturedimplantsurfacesinanexvivomodel
AT kravchenkoalexandra effectivityofhomecareandprofessionalbiofilmremovalproceduresoninitialsupragingivalbiofilmonlasermicrotexturedimplantsurfacesinanexvivomodel
AT ommerbornmichellealicia effectivityofhomecareandprofessionalbiofilmremovalproceduresoninitialsupragingivalbiofilmonlasermicrotexturedimplantsurfacesinanexvivomodel
AT beckerjurgen effectivityofhomecareandprofessionalbiofilmremovalproceduresoninitialsupragingivalbiofilmonlasermicrotexturedimplantsurfacesinanexvivomodel