Cargando…
Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
INTRODUCTION: In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3 |
_version_ | 1783695673811533824 |
---|---|
author | Halpin, David M. G. Criner, Gerard J. Dransfield, Mark T. Han, MeiLan K. Hartley, Benjamin Harvey, Catherine Jones, C. Elaine Kato, Motokazu Lange, Peter Lettis, Sally Lomas, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Martin, Neil Singh, Dave Wise, Robert Zheng, Jinping Lipson, David A. |
author_facet | Halpin, David M. G. Criner, Gerard J. Dransfield, Mark T. Han, MeiLan K. Hartley, Benjamin Harvey, Catherine Jones, C. Elaine Kato, Motokazu Lange, Peter Lettis, Sally Lomas, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Martin, Neil Singh, Dave Wise, Robert Zheng, Jinping Lipson, David A. |
author_sort | Halpin, David M. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was higher in FF-containing arms. As COPD is a growing problem in Asia, we compared the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Asia versus non-Asia regions. METHODS: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial in symptomatic COPD patients with ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year. This pre-specified analysis evaluated the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, mortality, and safety (including pneumonia) in Asia versus non-Asia regions. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 10,355 patients (Asia n = 1644 [16%]). Rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) for moderate/severe exacerbations with FF/UMEC/VI were 0.89 (0.76–1.05) versus FF/VI and 0.86 (0.71–1.04) versus UMEC/VI in Asia, and 0.84 (0.79–0.90) and 0.74 (0.68–0.80) in non-Asia. Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI on other endpoints was similar in both regions. There was an increased incidence of investigator-reported pneumonia in patients in Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 13%; FF/VI: 14%; UMEC/VI: 6%) compared with non-Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 6%; FF/VI: 5%; UMEC/VI: 4%). The increased risk of pneumonia in patients in Asia was most marked in patients with lower body mass index, lower lung function, and taking inhaled corticosteroids. In post hoc analysis of adjudicated on-treatment all-cause mortality, probabilities of death were numerically lower in both regions with FF/UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.16%; non-Asia: 1.35%) and FF/VI (Asia: 1.77%; non-Asia: 1.21%) versus UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.91%; non-Asia: 2.23%). CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI provides similar benefits in COPD patients in Asia and non-Asia regions. Clinical benefits of treatment, including reduction in mortality risk, should be weighed against risk of pneumonia, taking account of all known risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identification, NCT02164513. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8137798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81377982021-06-03 Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial Halpin, David M. G. Criner, Gerard J. Dransfield, Mark T. Han, MeiLan K. Hartley, Benjamin Harvey, Catherine Jones, C. Elaine Kato, Motokazu Lange, Peter Lettis, Sally Lomas, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Martin, Neil Singh, Dave Wise, Robert Zheng, Jinping Lipson, David A. Pulm Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was higher in FF-containing arms. As COPD is a growing problem in Asia, we compared the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Asia versus non-Asia regions. METHODS: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial in symptomatic COPD patients with ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year. This pre-specified analysis evaluated the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, mortality, and safety (including pneumonia) in Asia versus non-Asia regions. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 10,355 patients (Asia n = 1644 [16%]). Rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) for moderate/severe exacerbations with FF/UMEC/VI were 0.89 (0.76–1.05) versus FF/VI and 0.86 (0.71–1.04) versus UMEC/VI in Asia, and 0.84 (0.79–0.90) and 0.74 (0.68–0.80) in non-Asia. Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI on other endpoints was similar in both regions. There was an increased incidence of investigator-reported pneumonia in patients in Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 13%; FF/VI: 14%; UMEC/VI: 6%) compared with non-Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 6%; FF/VI: 5%; UMEC/VI: 4%). The increased risk of pneumonia in patients in Asia was most marked in patients with lower body mass index, lower lung function, and taking inhaled corticosteroids. In post hoc analysis of adjudicated on-treatment all-cause mortality, probabilities of death were numerically lower in both regions with FF/UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.16%; non-Asia: 1.35%) and FF/VI (Asia: 1.77%; non-Asia: 1.21%) versus UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.91%; non-Asia: 2.23%). CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI provides similar benefits in COPD patients in Asia and non-Asia regions. Clinical benefits of treatment, including reduction in mortality risk, should be weighed against risk of pneumonia, taking account of all known risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identification, NCT02164513. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8137798/ /pubmed/33201438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Halpin, David M. G. Criner, Gerard J. Dransfield, Mark T. Han, MeiLan K. Hartley, Benjamin Harvey, Catherine Jones, C. Elaine Kato, Motokazu Lange, Peter Lettis, Sally Lomas, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Martin, Neil Singh, Dave Wise, Robert Zheng, Jinping Lipson, David A. Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial |
title | Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial |
title_full | Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial |
title_fullStr | Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial |
title_short | Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial |
title_sort | triple versus dual combination therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in asian countries: analysis of the impact trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halpindavidmg tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT crinergerardj tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT dransfieldmarkt tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT hanmeilank tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT hartleybenjamin tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT harveycatherine tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT jonescelaine tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT katomotokazu tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT langepeter tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT lettissally tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT lomasdavida tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT martinezfernandoj tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT martinneil tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT singhdave tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT wiserobert tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT zhengjinping tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial AT lipsondavida tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial |