Cargando…

Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial

INTRODUCTION: In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halpin, David M. G., Criner, Gerard J., Dransfield, Mark T., Han, MeiLan K., Hartley, Benjamin, Harvey, Catherine, Jones, C. Elaine, Kato, Motokazu, Lange, Peter, Lettis, Sally, Lomas, David A., Martinez, Fernando J., Martin, Neil, Singh, Dave, Wise, Robert, Zheng, Jinping, Lipson, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3
_version_ 1783695673811533824
author Halpin, David M. G.
Criner, Gerard J.
Dransfield, Mark T.
Han, MeiLan K.
Hartley, Benjamin
Harvey, Catherine
Jones, C. Elaine
Kato, Motokazu
Lange, Peter
Lettis, Sally
Lomas, David A.
Martinez, Fernando J.
Martin, Neil
Singh, Dave
Wise, Robert
Zheng, Jinping
Lipson, David A.
author_facet Halpin, David M. G.
Criner, Gerard J.
Dransfield, Mark T.
Han, MeiLan K.
Hartley, Benjamin
Harvey, Catherine
Jones, C. Elaine
Kato, Motokazu
Lange, Peter
Lettis, Sally
Lomas, David A.
Martinez, Fernando J.
Martin, Neil
Singh, Dave
Wise, Robert
Zheng, Jinping
Lipson, David A.
author_sort Halpin, David M. G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was higher in FF-containing arms. As COPD is a growing problem in Asia, we compared the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Asia versus non-Asia regions. METHODS: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial in symptomatic COPD patients with ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year. This pre-specified analysis evaluated the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, mortality, and safety (including pneumonia) in Asia versus non-Asia regions. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 10,355 patients (Asia n = 1644 [16%]). Rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) for moderate/severe exacerbations with FF/UMEC/VI were 0.89 (0.76–1.05) versus FF/VI and 0.86 (0.71–1.04) versus UMEC/VI in Asia, and 0.84 (0.79–0.90) and 0.74 (0.68–0.80) in non-Asia. Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI on other endpoints was similar in both regions. There was an increased incidence of investigator-reported pneumonia in patients in Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 13%; FF/VI: 14%; UMEC/VI: 6%) compared with non-Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 6%; FF/VI: 5%; UMEC/VI: 4%). The increased risk of pneumonia in patients in Asia was most marked in patients with lower body mass index, lower lung function, and taking inhaled corticosteroids. In post hoc analysis of adjudicated on-treatment all-cause mortality, probabilities of death were numerically lower in both regions with FF/UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.16%; non-Asia: 1.35%) and FF/VI (Asia: 1.77%; non-Asia: 1.21%) versus UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.91%; non-Asia: 2.23%). CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI provides similar benefits in COPD patients in Asia and non-Asia regions. Clinical benefits of treatment, including reduction in mortality risk, should be weighed against risk of pneumonia, taking account of all known risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identification, NCT02164513. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81377982021-06-03 Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial Halpin, David M. G. Criner, Gerard J. Dransfield, Mark T. Han, MeiLan K. Hartley, Benjamin Harvey, Catherine Jones, C. Elaine Kato, Motokazu Lange, Peter Lettis, Sally Lomas, David A. Martinez, Fernando J. Martin, Neil Singh, Dave Wise, Robert Zheng, Jinping Lipson, David A. Pulm Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was higher in FF-containing arms. As COPD is a growing problem in Asia, we compared the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Asia versus non-Asia regions. METHODS: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial in symptomatic COPD patients with ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year. This pre-specified analysis evaluated the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, mortality, and safety (including pneumonia) in Asia versus non-Asia regions. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 10,355 patients (Asia n = 1644 [16%]). Rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) for moderate/severe exacerbations with FF/UMEC/VI were 0.89 (0.76–1.05) versus FF/VI and 0.86 (0.71–1.04) versus UMEC/VI in Asia, and 0.84 (0.79–0.90) and 0.74 (0.68–0.80) in non-Asia. Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI on other endpoints was similar in both regions. There was an increased incidence of investigator-reported pneumonia in patients in Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 13%; FF/VI: 14%; UMEC/VI: 6%) compared with non-Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 6%; FF/VI: 5%; UMEC/VI: 4%). The increased risk of pneumonia in patients in Asia was most marked in patients with lower body mass index, lower lung function, and taking inhaled corticosteroids. In post hoc analysis of adjudicated on-treatment all-cause mortality, probabilities of death were numerically lower in both regions with FF/UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.16%; non-Asia: 1.35%) and FF/VI (Asia: 1.77%; non-Asia: 1.21%) versus UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.91%; non-Asia: 2.23%). CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI provides similar benefits in COPD patients in Asia and non-Asia regions. Clinical benefits of treatment, including reduction in mortality risk, should be weighed against risk of pneumonia, taking account of all known risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identification, NCT02164513. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8137798/ /pubmed/33201438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Halpin, David M. G.
Criner, Gerard J.
Dransfield, Mark T.
Han, MeiLan K.
Hartley, Benjamin
Harvey, Catherine
Jones, C. Elaine
Kato, Motokazu
Lange, Peter
Lettis, Sally
Lomas, David A.
Martinez, Fernando J.
Martin, Neil
Singh, Dave
Wise, Robert
Zheng, Jinping
Lipson, David A.
Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
title Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
title_full Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
title_fullStr Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
title_full_unstemmed Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
title_short Triple Versus Dual Combination Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Asian Countries: Analysis of the IMPACT Trial
title_sort triple versus dual combination therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in asian countries: analysis of the impact trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3
work_keys_str_mv AT halpindavidmg tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT crinergerardj tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT dransfieldmarkt tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT hanmeilank tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT hartleybenjamin tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT harveycatherine tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT jonescelaine tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT katomotokazu tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT langepeter tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT lettissally tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT lomasdavida tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT martinezfernandoj tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT martinneil tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT singhdave tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT wiserobert tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT zhengjinping tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial
AT lipsondavida tripleversusdualcombinationtherapyinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinasiancountriesanalysisoftheimpacttrial