Cargando…

A retrospective cohort study comparing clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation in patients undergoing surgery for osteomyelitis in England: a case for reorganising orthopaedic infection services

Aims: An investigation of the impact of a multidisciplinary bone infection unit (BIU) undertaking osteomyelitis surgery with a single-stage protocol on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation compared to national outcomes in England. Patients and Methods: A tertiary referral multidisciplinary B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Jamie, Alexander, Myriam, Bruce, Stuart, O'Connell, Matthew, Beecroft, Sue, McNally, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084705
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-151-2021
Descripción
Sumario:Aims: An investigation of the impact of a multidisciplinary bone infection unit (BIU) undertaking osteomyelitis surgery with a single-stage protocol on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation compared to national outcomes in England. Patients and Methods: A tertiary referral multidisciplinary BIU was compared to the rest of England (ROE) and a subset of the 10 next busiest centres based on osteomyelitis treatment episode volume (Top Ten), using the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES). A total of 25 006 patients undergoing osteomyelitis surgery between April 2013 and March 2017 were included. Data on secondary healthcare resource utilisation and clinical indicators were extracted for 24 months before and after surgery. Results: Patients treated at the BIU had higher orthopaedic healthcare utilisation in the 2 years prior to their index procedure, with more admissions ([Formula: see text]  0.001) and a mean length of stay (LOS) over 4 times longer than other groups (10.99 d, compared to 2.79 d for Top Ten and 2.46 d for the ROE, [Formula: see text]  0.001). During the index inpatient period, the BIU had fewer mean theatre visits (1.25) compared to the TT (1.98, [Formula: see text]  0.001) and the ROE (1.64, [Formula: see text]  0.001). The index inpatient period was shorter in the BIU (11.84 d), 33.6 % less than the Top Ten (17.83 d, [Formula: see text]  0.001) and 29.9 % shorter than the ROE (16.88 d, [Formula: see text]  0.001). During follow-up, BIU patients underwent fewer osteomyelitis-related reoperations than Top Ten centres ([Formula: see text]  0.0139) and the ROE ([Formula: see text]  0.0137). Mortality was lower (4.71 %) compared to the Top Ten (20.06 %, [Formula: see text]  0.001) and the ROE (22.63 %, [Formula: see text]  0.001). The cumulative BIU total amputation rate was lower (6.47 %) compared to the Top Ten (15.96 %, [Formula: see text]  0.001) and the ROE (12.71 %, [Formula: see text]  0.001). Overall healthcare utilisation was lower in the BIU for all inpatient admissions, LOS, and Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances. Conclusion: The benefits of managing osteomyelitis in a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) specialist setting included reduced hospital stays, lower reoperation rates for infection recurrence, improved survival, lower amputation rates, and lower overall healthcare utilisation. These results support the establishment of centrally funded multidisciplinary bone infection units that will improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare utilisation.