Cargando…

Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study

The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody–drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vahdat, Linda T., Schmid, Peter, Forero-Torres, Andres, Blackwell, Kimberly, Telli, Melinda L., Melisko, Michelle, Möbus, Volker, Cortes, Javier, Montero, Alberto J., Ma, Cynthia, Nanda, Rita, Wright, Gail S., He, Yi, Hawthorne, Thomas, Bagley, Rebecca G., Halim, Abdel-Baset, Turner, Christopher D., Yardley, Denise A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00244-6
_version_ 1783695702793125888
author Vahdat, Linda T.
Schmid, Peter
Forero-Torres, Andres
Blackwell, Kimberly
Telli, Melinda L.
Melisko, Michelle
Möbus, Volker
Cortes, Javier
Montero, Alberto J.
Ma, Cynthia
Nanda, Rita
Wright, Gail S.
He, Yi
Hawthorne, Thomas
Bagley, Rebecca G.
Halim, Abdel-Baset
Turner, Christopher D.
Yardley, Denise A.
author_facet Vahdat, Linda T.
Schmid, Peter
Forero-Torres, Andres
Blackwell, Kimberly
Telli, Melinda L.
Melisko, Michelle
Möbus, Volker
Cortes, Javier
Montero, Alberto J.
Ma, Cynthia
Nanda, Rita
Wright, Gail S.
He, Yi
Hawthorne, Thomas
Bagley, Rebecca G.
Halim, Abdel-Baset
Turner, Christopher D.
Yardley, Denise A.
author_sort Vahdat, Linda T.
collection PubMed
description The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody–drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of GV compared with capecitabine in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. Patients who had previously received anthracycline and taxane-based therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive, GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m(2) PO daily d1–14 q21 days). The primary endpoint was RECIST 1.1 PFS per independent, blinded central review. In all, 327 patients were randomized to GV (213 treated) or capecitabine (92 treated). Median PFS was 2.9 months for GV vs. 2.8 months for capecitabine. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for GV were neutropenia, rash, and leukopenia, and for capecitabine were fatigue, diarrhea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS over capecitabine or demonstrate a relative risk/benefit improvement over capecitabine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8137923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81379232021-06-03 Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study Vahdat, Linda T. Schmid, Peter Forero-Torres, Andres Blackwell, Kimberly Telli, Melinda L. Melisko, Michelle Möbus, Volker Cortes, Javier Montero, Alberto J. Ma, Cynthia Nanda, Rita Wright, Gail S. He, Yi Hawthorne, Thomas Bagley, Rebecca G. Halim, Abdel-Baset Turner, Christopher D. Yardley, Denise A. NPJ Breast Cancer Article The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody–drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of GV compared with capecitabine in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. Patients who had previously received anthracycline and taxane-based therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive, GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m(2) PO daily d1–14 q21 days). The primary endpoint was RECIST 1.1 PFS per independent, blinded central review. In all, 327 patients were randomized to GV (213 treated) or capecitabine (92 treated). Median PFS was 2.9 months for GV vs. 2.8 months for capecitabine. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for GV were neutropenia, rash, and leukopenia, and for capecitabine were fatigue, diarrhea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS over capecitabine or demonstrate a relative risk/benefit improvement over capecitabine. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8137923/ /pubmed/34016993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00244-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vahdat, Linda T.
Schmid, Peter
Forero-Torres, Andres
Blackwell, Kimberly
Telli, Melinda L.
Melisko, Michelle
Möbus, Volker
Cortes, Javier
Montero, Alberto J.
Ma, Cynthia
Nanda, Rita
Wright, Gail S.
He, Yi
Hawthorne, Thomas
Bagley, Rebecca G.
Halim, Abdel-Baset
Turner, Christopher D.
Yardley, Denise A.
Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
title Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
title_full Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
title_fullStr Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
title_short Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
title_sort glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpnmb overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“metric”): a randomized multicenter study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8137923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00244-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vahdatlindat glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT schmidpeter glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT forerotorresandres glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT blackwellkimberly glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT tellimelindal glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT meliskomichelle glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT mobusvolker glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT cortesjavier glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT monteroalbertoj glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT macynthia glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT nandarita glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT wrightgails glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT heyi glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT hawthornethomas glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT bagleyrebeccag glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT halimabdelbaset glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT turnerchristopherd glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT yardleydenisea glembatumumabvedotinforpatientswithmetastaticgpnmboverexpressingtriplenegativebreastcancermetricarandomizedmulticenterstudy