Cargando…

Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Researchers have proved Glycine to be safe, less abrasive, sweet and comfortable for patients. It is beneficial in removing plaque as well as stains. The present study aims to compare the plaque and extrinsic stain removal efficacy of the air-polishing device and rubber cup prophylaxis t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Avineet, Bhardwaj, Arvind, Kansil, Shanam, Kaur, Rasveen, Kaur, Supreet, Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041053
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1459_20
_version_ 1783695788433473536
author Kaur, Avineet
Bhardwaj, Arvind
Kansil, Shanam
Kaur, Rasveen
Kaur, Supreet
Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
author_facet Kaur, Avineet
Bhardwaj, Arvind
Kansil, Shanam
Kaur, Rasveen
Kaur, Supreet
Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
author_sort Kaur, Avineet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers have proved Glycine to be safe, less abrasive, sweet and comfortable for patients. It is beneficial in removing plaque as well as stains. The present study aims to compare the plaque and extrinsic stain removal efficacy of the air-polishing device and rubber cup prophylaxis technique along with a comparative evaluation of the gingival trauma caused by both the techniques. METHOD: This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on a total of 60 subjects in half of whom, left side was assigned to Glycine powder air polishing and the right side to rubber cup prophylaxis with (Glycine powder) and vice versa in the other half. All the subjects had their calculus removed one month prior to the intervention. Plaque index, Stain index and Trauma index were recorded and statistical analysis was done. RESULTS: Both the techniques (RCP and AP) demonstrated a significant reduction in plaque and stains within their respective groups, but revealed non-significant differences between the study groups. Gingival trauma was found to be significantly higher in case of AP group. Rubber cup technique was preferred over air polishing by the subjects. CONCLUSION: The data indicates that both the techniques were equally beneficial for plaque and stain removal, but rubber cup polishing technique has an advantage over the air polishing technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8138352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81383522021-05-25 Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial Kaur, Avineet Bhardwaj, Arvind Kansil, Shanam Kaur, Rasveen Kaur, Supreet Gambhir, Ramandeep S. J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Researchers have proved Glycine to be safe, less abrasive, sweet and comfortable for patients. It is beneficial in removing plaque as well as stains. The present study aims to compare the plaque and extrinsic stain removal efficacy of the air-polishing device and rubber cup prophylaxis technique along with a comparative evaluation of the gingival trauma caused by both the techniques. METHOD: This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on a total of 60 subjects in half of whom, left side was assigned to Glycine powder air polishing and the right side to rubber cup prophylaxis with (Glycine powder) and vice versa in the other half. All the subjects had their calculus removed one month prior to the intervention. Plaque index, Stain index and Trauma index were recorded and statistical analysis was done. RESULTS: Both the techniques (RCP and AP) demonstrated a significant reduction in plaque and stains within their respective groups, but revealed non-significant differences between the study groups. Gingival trauma was found to be significantly higher in case of AP group. Rubber cup technique was preferred over air polishing by the subjects. CONCLUSION: The data indicates that both the techniques were equally beneficial for plaque and stain removal, but rubber cup polishing technique has an advantage over the air polishing technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-02 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8138352/ /pubmed/34041053 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1459_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Avineet
Bhardwaj, Arvind
Kansil, Shanam
Kaur, Rasveen
Kaur, Supreet
Gambhir, Ramandeep S.
Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
title Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
title_full Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
title_short Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
title_sort efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - a clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041053
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1459_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kauravineet efficacyevaluationofrubbercupandairpolishingtechniquesusingglycineinplaqueandstainremovalaclinicaltrial
AT bhardwajarvind efficacyevaluationofrubbercupandairpolishingtechniquesusingglycineinplaqueandstainremovalaclinicaltrial
AT kansilshanam efficacyevaluationofrubbercupandairpolishingtechniquesusingglycineinplaqueandstainremovalaclinicaltrial
AT kaurrasveen efficacyevaluationofrubbercupandairpolishingtechniquesusingglycineinplaqueandstainremovalaclinicaltrial
AT kaursupreet efficacyevaluationofrubbercupandairpolishingtechniquesusingglycineinplaqueandstainremovalaclinicaltrial
AT gambhirramandeeps efficacyevaluationofrubbercupandairpolishingtechniquesusingglycineinplaqueandstainremovalaclinicaltrial