Cargando…

Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19

INTRODUCTION: Given the current lack of an approved and effective treatment or vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), repositioning old drugs for use as an antiviral treatment is an interesting strategy because knowledge about these drugs’ safety profile, posology,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Rajesh M, Namachivayam, ArunKumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045812
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23773
_version_ 1783695848734982144
author Shetty, Rajesh M
Namachivayam, ArunKumar
author_facet Shetty, Rajesh M
Namachivayam, ArunKumar
author_sort Shetty, Rajesh M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Given the current lack of an approved and effective treatment or vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), repositioning old drugs for use as an antiviral treatment is an interesting strategy because knowledge about these drugs’ safety profile, posology, and drug interactions is already known. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, widely used as antimalarial and autoimmune disease drugs, have recently been reported as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug. BACKGROUND: The in vitro antiviral activity of chloroquine has been identified since the late 1960s. However, antiviral mechanisms of chloroquine remain speculative. Several clinical trials have been conducted to test the efficacy and safety of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19-associated pneumonia. The quality of the studies and the outcomes are evaluated in this systematic review and meta-analysis. REVIEW RESULTS: Literature review revealed 23 clinical studies. Only 9 of 23 studies were randomized controlled trials. Of nine randomized controlled trials, only study by Skipper et al. was deemed to be at low risk of bias. All studies evaluated variedwith different outcomes. Mechanical ventilation and virological clearance were the only common outcomes evaluated in more than two studies. Virological clearance odds ratio (OR) was 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.57–2.73; Chi(2) = 0.83; I(2) = 0%). GRADE quality of evidence was downgraded by three levels to very low due to concerns about the risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. For mechanical ventilation, OR was 1.09 (95% CI 0.80–1.50; Chi(2) = 0; I(2) = 0). GRADE quality of evidence was downgraded by two levels to low due to concerns about the risk of bias and imprecision. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for these two outcomes. CONCLUSION: As per the available evidence, based on our review, we conclude that hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine has not shown to be beneficial when used for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Shetty RM, Namachivayam A. Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):441–452.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8138637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81386372021-05-26 Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19 Shetty, Rajesh M Namachivayam, ArunKumar Indian J Crit Care Med Review Article INTRODUCTION: Given the current lack of an approved and effective treatment or vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), repositioning old drugs for use as an antiviral treatment is an interesting strategy because knowledge about these drugs’ safety profile, posology, and drug interactions is already known. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, widely used as antimalarial and autoimmune disease drugs, have recently been reported as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug. BACKGROUND: The in vitro antiviral activity of chloroquine has been identified since the late 1960s. However, antiviral mechanisms of chloroquine remain speculative. Several clinical trials have been conducted to test the efficacy and safety of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19-associated pneumonia. The quality of the studies and the outcomes are evaluated in this systematic review and meta-analysis. REVIEW RESULTS: Literature review revealed 23 clinical studies. Only 9 of 23 studies were randomized controlled trials. Of nine randomized controlled trials, only study by Skipper et al. was deemed to be at low risk of bias. All studies evaluated variedwith different outcomes. Mechanical ventilation and virological clearance were the only common outcomes evaluated in more than two studies. Virological clearance odds ratio (OR) was 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.57–2.73; Chi(2) = 0.83; I(2) = 0%). GRADE quality of evidence was downgraded by three levels to very low due to concerns about the risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. For mechanical ventilation, OR was 1.09 (95% CI 0.80–1.50; Chi(2) = 0; I(2) = 0). GRADE quality of evidence was downgraded by two levels to low due to concerns about the risk of bias and imprecision. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for these two outcomes. CONCLUSION: As per the available evidence, based on our review, we conclude that hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine has not shown to be beneficial when used for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Shetty RM, Namachivayam A. Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):441–452. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8138637/ /pubmed/34045812 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23773 Text en Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review Article
Shetty, Rajesh M
Namachivayam, ArunKumar
Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19
title Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19
title_full Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19
title_fullStr Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19
title_short Evidence for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19
title_sort evidence for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of covid-19
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045812
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23773
work_keys_str_mv AT shettyrajeshm evidenceforchloroquinehydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT namachivayamarunkumar evidenceforchloroquinehydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19