Cargando…
How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better
A guiding principle of STAR Protocols is that we make researchers’ lives easier by publishing robust and usable protocols. We leverage the strength of peer review to help authors improve their protocol. This Backstory details the transformation of a bench protocol to a published protocol, highlighti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100468 |
_version_ | 1783695873941700608 |
---|---|
author | Pavlovich, Matthew J. Buttery, Shawnna |
author_facet | Pavlovich, Matthew J. Buttery, Shawnna |
author_sort | Pavlovich, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A guiding principle of STAR Protocols is that we make researchers’ lives easier by publishing robust and usable protocols. We leverage the strength of peer review to help authors improve their protocol. This Backstory details the transformation of a bench protocol to a published protocol, highlighting the improvements to the article through the drafting, review, and revision stages. This underscores the value of the peer review process in general and the collaborative peer review philosophy at STAR Protocols specifically. For complete details, please refer to Chhoy et al. (2021). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8138771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81387712021-05-24 How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better Pavlovich, Matthew J. Buttery, Shawnna STAR Protoc Backstory A guiding principle of STAR Protocols is that we make researchers’ lives easier by publishing robust and usable protocols. We leverage the strength of peer review to help authors improve their protocol. This Backstory details the transformation of a bench protocol to a published protocol, highlighting the improvements to the article through the drafting, review, and revision stages. This underscores the value of the peer review process in general and the collaborative peer review philosophy at STAR Protocols specifically. For complete details, please refer to Chhoy et al. (2021). Elsevier 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8138771/ /pubmed/34036281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100468 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Backstory Pavlovich, Matthew J. Buttery, Shawnna How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
title | How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
title_full | How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
title_fullStr | How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
title_full_unstemmed | How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
title_short | How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
title_sort | how peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better |
topic | Backstory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100468 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavlovichmatthewj howpeerreviewandpublicationcanmakeagoodprotocolevenbetter AT butteryshawnna howpeerreviewandpublicationcanmakeagoodprotocolevenbetter |