Cargando…

Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study

The present study aimed to introduce a novel method of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, so-called ‘modified one-piece mechanical anastomosis’ (MOMA) in McKeown esophagogastrectomy and to compare its feasibility, efficacy and safety with those of ‘conventionally double-layer hand-sewn anastomosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Kunshou, Zhang, Jiulong, Chen, Xiaohui, Deng, Yujie, Lin, Shaofeng, Cai, Yibin, Weng, Guibin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2296
_version_ 1783695889819238400
author Zhu, Kunshou
Zhang, Jiulong
Chen, Xiaohui
Deng, Yujie
Lin, Shaofeng
Cai, Yibin
Weng, Guibin
author_facet Zhu, Kunshou
Zhang, Jiulong
Chen, Xiaohui
Deng, Yujie
Lin, Shaofeng
Cai, Yibin
Weng, Guibin
author_sort Zhu, Kunshou
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to introduce a novel method of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, so-called ‘modified one-piece mechanical anastomosis’ (MOMA) in McKeown esophagogastrectomy and to compare its feasibility, efficacy and safety with those of ‘conventionally double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis’ (CDHA). Between March 2016 and March 2018, 80 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy with a curative intent were included in the present study. Among them, 40 received MOMA and the other 40 received CDHA. Their medical records, including operation time, anastomotic time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications within 30 days, as well as survival rate, were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed and compared. Total operation time, anastomotic time and estimated blood loss in the MOMA group were significantly decreased compared with those in the CDHA group (207.73±2.66 vs. 225.40±3.43 min; 10.95±0.44 vs. 23.03±0.47 min; 144.50±21.14 vs. 241.75±23.75 ml; all P<0.01). Anastomotic leakage was present in 1 patient in the CDHA group, but no patients in the MOMA group (P=1.000). Anastomotic stenosis was documented in 4 and 2 patients in the MOMA and CDHA group, respectively (P=0.392). The 30-day operative mortality was 0% and no significant difference was demonstrated in postoperative complications within groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the disease-free and overall survival was compared by means of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests and no statistical difference was determined (P=0.5114 and P=0.7875, respectively). McKeown esophagogastrectomy with MOMA may be a feasible, effective and reproducible alternative with relatively satisfactory postoperative outcomes for the treatment of TE-SCC, providing shorter operation and anastomosis times, and less estimated intraoperative blood loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8138850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81388502021-05-27 Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study Zhu, Kunshou Zhang, Jiulong Chen, Xiaohui Deng, Yujie Lin, Shaofeng Cai, Yibin Weng, Guibin Mol Clin Oncol Articles The present study aimed to introduce a novel method of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, so-called ‘modified one-piece mechanical anastomosis’ (MOMA) in McKeown esophagogastrectomy and to compare its feasibility, efficacy and safety with those of ‘conventionally double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis’ (CDHA). Between March 2016 and March 2018, 80 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy with a curative intent were included in the present study. Among them, 40 received MOMA and the other 40 received CDHA. Their medical records, including operation time, anastomotic time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications within 30 days, as well as survival rate, were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed and compared. Total operation time, anastomotic time and estimated blood loss in the MOMA group were significantly decreased compared with those in the CDHA group (207.73±2.66 vs. 225.40±3.43 min; 10.95±0.44 vs. 23.03±0.47 min; 144.50±21.14 vs. 241.75±23.75 ml; all P<0.01). Anastomotic leakage was present in 1 patient in the CDHA group, but no patients in the MOMA group (P=1.000). Anastomotic stenosis was documented in 4 and 2 patients in the MOMA and CDHA group, respectively (P=0.392). The 30-day operative mortality was 0% and no significant difference was demonstrated in postoperative complications within groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the disease-free and overall survival was compared by means of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests and no statistical difference was determined (P=0.5114 and P=0.7875, respectively). McKeown esophagogastrectomy with MOMA may be a feasible, effective and reproducible alternative with relatively satisfactory postoperative outcomes for the treatment of TE-SCC, providing shorter operation and anastomosis times, and less estimated intraoperative blood loss. D.A. Spandidos 2021-07 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8138850/ /pubmed/34055349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2296 Text en Copyright: © Zhu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zhu, Kunshou
Zhang, Jiulong
Chen, Xiaohui
Deng, Yujie
Lin, Shaofeng
Cai, Yibin
Weng, Guibin
Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study
title Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study
title_full Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study
title_short Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study
title_sort comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in mckeown esophagogastrectomy: a single-institute retrospective study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2296
work_keys_str_mv AT zhukunshou comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy
AT zhangjiulong comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy
AT chenxiaohui comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy
AT dengyujie comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy
AT linshaofeng comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy
AT caiyibin comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy
AT wengguibin comparisonofamodifiedonepiecemechanicalanddoublelayerhandsewnanastomosisinmckeownesophagogastrectomyasingleinstituteretrospectivestudy