Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia

OBJECTIVES: Supportive care needs survey short form has a total of 34 items that have 5 domains that measure the unmet needs of cancer patients. It is important to validate this tool since there are differences in culture, geographic areas, and clinical care service which influence patients’ needs....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afework, Tsion, Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya, Alemayehu, Natnael, Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna, Addissie, Adamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2
_version_ 1783695902354964480
author Afework, Tsion
Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya
Alemayehu, Natnael
Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna
Addissie, Adamu
author_facet Afework, Tsion
Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya
Alemayehu, Natnael
Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna
Addissie, Adamu
author_sort Afework, Tsion
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Supportive care needs survey short form has a total of 34 items that have 5 domains that measure the unmet needs of cancer patients. It is important to validate this tool since there are differences in culture, geographic areas, and clinical care service which influence patients’ needs. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the construct validity and reliability of the tool. METHODS: The study was conducted among 170 cancer patients from April 1st to 30th 2019 in Hawassa hospital, South Ethiopia. Confirmatory factor analysis was done using fit indices. Convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated using average variance extracted and maximum shared variance respectively. Known group validity was checked using the Mann-Whitney U test. The reliability of the instrument was examined using Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS: Domains except for health system and information, and patient care and support maintained convergent and divergent validity. The remaining validity was maintained after removing items that were redundant and double loading. The average variance extracted of domains varied from 0.52–0.81. The Square of correlation between constructs was lower than the average variance extracted for the constructs. The tool had reliability r = 0.932. The root mean square error of approximation was 0.057, comparative fit index 0.954, and the other fit indices were also indicating a good fit. Known groups difference was seen by age and type of treatment taken across the different domains. CONCLUSION: After the health system and information, and patient care, and support domain validity issues were corrected by removing 8 items, the reduced tool was found to be a valid and reliable tool. The validated tool will be valuable if included in routine cancer care in our clinical settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8138921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81389212021-05-21 Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia Afework, Tsion Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya Alemayehu, Natnael Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna Addissie, Adamu BMC Health Serv Res Research Article OBJECTIVES: Supportive care needs survey short form has a total of 34 items that have 5 domains that measure the unmet needs of cancer patients. It is important to validate this tool since there are differences in culture, geographic areas, and clinical care service which influence patients’ needs. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the construct validity and reliability of the tool. METHODS: The study was conducted among 170 cancer patients from April 1st to 30th 2019 in Hawassa hospital, South Ethiopia. Confirmatory factor analysis was done using fit indices. Convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated using average variance extracted and maximum shared variance respectively. Known group validity was checked using the Mann-Whitney U test. The reliability of the instrument was examined using Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS: Domains except for health system and information, and patient care and support maintained convergent and divergent validity. The remaining validity was maintained after removing items that were redundant and double loading. The average variance extracted of domains varied from 0.52–0.81. The Square of correlation between constructs was lower than the average variance extracted for the constructs. The tool had reliability r = 0.932. The root mean square error of approximation was 0.057, comparative fit index 0.954, and the other fit indices were also indicating a good fit. Known groups difference was seen by age and type of treatment taken across the different domains. CONCLUSION: After the health system and information, and patient care, and support domain validity issues were corrected by removing 8 items, the reduced tool was found to be a valid and reliable tool. The validated tool will be valuable if included in routine cancer care in our clinical settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2. BioMed Central 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8138921/ /pubmed/34020635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Afework, Tsion
Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya
Alemayehu, Natnael
Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna
Addissie, Adamu
Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_full Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_short Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_sort validity and reliability of the amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2
work_keys_str_mv AT afeworktsion validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT wondimagegnehuabigiya validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT alemayehunatnael validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT kantelhardtevajohanna validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT addissieadamu validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia