Cargando…

Patient perspectives of target weight management and ultrafiltration in haemodialysis: a multi-center survey

BACKGROUND: Decisions around planned ultrafiltration volumes are the only part of the haemodialysis prescription decided upon at every session. Removing too much fluid or too little is associated with both acute symptoms and long-term outcomes. The degree to which patients engage with or influence d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keane, David, Glyde, Megan, Dasgupta, Indranil, Gardiner, Claire, Lindley, Elizabeth, Mitra, Sandip, Palmer, Nicholas, Dye, Louise, Wright, Mark, Sutherland, Ed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02399-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Decisions around planned ultrafiltration volumes are the only part of the haemodialysis prescription decided upon at every session. Removing too much fluid or too little is associated with both acute symptoms and long-term outcomes. The degree to which patients engage with or influence decision-making is not clear. We explored patient perspectives of prescribing ultrafiltration volumes, their understanding of the process and engagement with it. METHODS: A questionnaire developed for this study was administered to 1077 patients across 10 UK Renal Units. Factor analysis reduced the dataset into factors representing common themes. Relationships between survey results and factors were investigated using regression models. ANCOVA was used to explore differences between Renal Units. RESULTS: Patients generally felt in control of their fluid management and that they were given the final say on planned ultrafiltration volumes. Around half of the respondents reported they take an active role in their treatment. However, respondents were largely unable to relate signs and symptoms to fluid management practice and a third said they would not report common signs and symptoms to clinicians. A fifth of patients reported not to know how ultrafiltration volumes were calculated. Patients responded positively to questions relating to healthcare staff, though with significant variation between units, highlighting differences in perception of care. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of formal acknowledgement in fluid management protocols, patients have significant involvement in decisions regarding fluid removal during dialysis. Furthermore, substantial gaps remain in patient knowledge and engagement. Formalizing the role of patients in these decisions, including patient education, may improve prescription and achievement of target weights. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02399-7.