Cargando…

The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale

BACKGROUND: Chronic care involves multiple activities that can be performed by individuals and healthcare staff as well as by other actors and artifacts, such as eHealth services. Thus, chronic care management can be viewed as a system where the individual interacts with people and eHealth services...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, Roczniewska, Marta, Pukk Härenstam, Karin, Karlgren, Klas, Hasson, Henna, Menczel, Sivan, Wannheden, Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06455-8
_version_ 1783695917442924544
author von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Roczniewska, Marta
Pukk Härenstam, Karin
Karlgren, Klas
Hasson, Henna
Menczel, Sivan
Wannheden, Carolina
author_facet von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Roczniewska, Marta
Pukk Härenstam, Karin
Karlgren, Klas
Hasson, Henna
Menczel, Sivan
Wannheden, Carolina
author_sort von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic care involves multiple activities that can be performed by individuals and healthcare staff as well as by other actors and artifacts, such as eHealth services. Thus, chronic care management can be viewed as a system where the individual interacts with people and eHealth services performing activities to maintain or improve health and functioning, called co-care. Yet, the system perspective is not reflected in concepts such as person-centered care and shared decision making. This limits the understanding of individuals’ global experience of chronic care management and subsequently the ability to optimize chronic care. The aim of this study was threefold: (1) to propose a theory-based operationalization of co-care for chronic care management, (2) to develop a scale to measure co-care as a distributed system of activities, and (3) to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties. With the theory of distributed cognition as a theoretical underpinning, co-care was operationalized along three dimensions: experience of activities, needs support, and goal orientation. METHODS: Informed by the literature on patient experiences and work psychology, a scale denoted Distribution of Co-Care Activities (DoCCA) was developed with the three conceptualized dimensions, the activities dimension consisting of three sub-factors: demands, unnecessary tasks, and role clarity. It was tested with 113 primary care patients with chronic conditions in Sweden at two time points. RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis showed support for a second-order model with the three conceptualized dimensions, with activities further divided into the three sub-factors. Cronbach’s alpha values indicated a good to excellent reliability of the subscales, and correlations across time points with panel data indicated satisfactory test-retest reliability. Convergent, concurrent and predictive validity of the scale were, overall, satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric evaluation supports a model consisting of activities (demands, unnecessary tasks, and role clarity), needs support and goal orientation that can be reliably measured with the DoCCA scale. The scale provides a way to assess chronic care management as a system, considering the perspective of the individuals with the chronic condition and how they perceive the work that must be done, across situations, either by themselves or through healthcare, eHealth, or other means. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06455-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8138998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81389982021-05-21 The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Roczniewska, Marta Pukk Härenstam, Karin Karlgren, Klas Hasson, Henna Menczel, Sivan Wannheden, Carolina BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic care involves multiple activities that can be performed by individuals and healthcare staff as well as by other actors and artifacts, such as eHealth services. Thus, chronic care management can be viewed as a system where the individual interacts with people and eHealth services performing activities to maintain or improve health and functioning, called co-care. Yet, the system perspective is not reflected in concepts such as person-centered care and shared decision making. This limits the understanding of individuals’ global experience of chronic care management and subsequently the ability to optimize chronic care. The aim of this study was threefold: (1) to propose a theory-based operationalization of co-care for chronic care management, (2) to develop a scale to measure co-care as a distributed system of activities, and (3) to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties. With the theory of distributed cognition as a theoretical underpinning, co-care was operationalized along three dimensions: experience of activities, needs support, and goal orientation. METHODS: Informed by the literature on patient experiences and work psychology, a scale denoted Distribution of Co-Care Activities (DoCCA) was developed with the three conceptualized dimensions, the activities dimension consisting of three sub-factors: demands, unnecessary tasks, and role clarity. It was tested with 113 primary care patients with chronic conditions in Sweden at two time points. RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis showed support for a second-order model with the three conceptualized dimensions, with activities further divided into the three sub-factors. Cronbach’s alpha values indicated a good to excellent reliability of the subscales, and correlations across time points with panel data indicated satisfactory test-retest reliability. Convergent, concurrent and predictive validity of the scale were, overall, satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric evaluation supports a model consisting of activities (demands, unnecessary tasks, and role clarity), needs support and goal orientation that can be reliably measured with the DoCCA scale. The scale provides a way to assess chronic care management as a system, considering the perspective of the individuals with the chronic condition and how they perceive the work that must be done, across situations, either by themselves or through healthcare, eHealth, or other means. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06455-8. BioMed Central 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8138998/ /pubmed/34016102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06455-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Roczniewska, Marta
Pukk Härenstam, Karin
Karlgren, Klas
Hasson, Henna
Menczel, Sivan
Wannheden, Carolina
The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale
title The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale
title_full The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale
title_fullStr The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale
title_full_unstemmed The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale
title_short The work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (DoCCA) scale
title_sort work of having a chronic condition: development and psychometric evaluation of the distribution of co-care activities (docca) scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06455-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vonthieleschwarzulrica theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT roczniewskamarta theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT pukkharenstamkarin theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT karlgrenklas theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT hassonhenna theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT menczelsivan theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT wannhedencarolina theworkofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT roczniewskamarta workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT pukkharenstamkarin workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT karlgrenklas workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT hassonhenna workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT menczelsivan workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale
AT wannhedencarolina workofhavingachronicconditiondevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationofthedistributionofcocareactivitiesdoccascale