Cargando…
Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites
BACKGROUND: Beginning in the last century, coral reefs have suffered the consequences of anthropogenic activities, including oil contamination. Chemical remediation methods, such as dispersants, can cause substantial harm to corals and reduce their resilience to stressors. To evaluate the impacts of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01041-w |
_version_ | 1783695917694582784 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Denise P. Villela, Helena D. M. Santos, Henrique F. Duarte, Gustavo A. S. Ribeiro, José Roberto Ghizelini, Angela M. Vilela, Caren L. S. Rosado, Phillipe M. Fazolato, Carolline S. Santoro, Erika P. Carmo, Flavia L. Ximenes, Dalton S. Soriano, Adriana U. Rachid, Caio T. C. C. Vega Thurber, Rebecca L. Peixoto, Raquel S. |
author_facet | Silva, Denise P. Villela, Helena D. M. Santos, Henrique F. Duarte, Gustavo A. S. Ribeiro, José Roberto Ghizelini, Angela M. Vilela, Caren L. S. Rosado, Phillipe M. Fazolato, Carolline S. Santoro, Erika P. Carmo, Flavia L. Ximenes, Dalton S. Soriano, Adriana U. Rachid, Caio T. C. C. Vega Thurber, Rebecca L. Peixoto, Raquel S. |
author_sort | Silva, Denise P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Beginning in the last century, coral reefs have suffered the consequences of anthropogenic activities, including oil contamination. Chemical remediation methods, such as dispersants, can cause substantial harm to corals and reduce their resilience to stressors. To evaluate the impacts of oil contamination and find potential alternative solutions to chemical dispersants, we conducted a mesocosm experiment with the fire coral Millepora alcicornis, which is sensitive to environmental changes. We exposed M. alcicornis to a realistic oil-spill scenario in which we applied an innovative multi-domain bioremediator consortium (bacteria, filamentous fungi, and yeast) and a chemical dispersant (Corexit® 9500, one of the most widely used dispersants), to assess the effects on host health and host-associated microbial communities. RESULTS: The selected multi-domain microbial consortium helped to mitigate the impacts of the oil, substantially degrading the polycyclic aromatic and n-alkane fractions and maintaining the physiological integrity of the corals. Exposure to Corexit 9500 negatively impacted the host physiology and altered the coral-associated microbial community. After exposure, the abundances of certain bacterial genera such as Rugeria and Roseovarius increased, as previously reported in stressed or diseased corals. We also identified several bioindicators of Corexit 9500 in the microbiome. The impact of Corexit 9500 on the coral health and microbial community was far greater than oil alone, killing corals after only 4 days of exposure in the flow-through system. In the treatments with Corexit 9500, the action of the bioremediator consortium could not be observed directly because of the extreme toxicity of the dispersant to M. alcicornis and its associated microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the importance of investigating the host-associated microbiome in order to detect and mitigate the effects of oil contamination on corals and the potential role of microbial mitigation and bioindicators as conservation tools. Chemical dispersants were far more damaging to corals and their associated microbiome than oil, and should not be used close to coral reefs. This study can aid in decision-making to minimize the negative effects of oil and dispersants on coral reefs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-021-01041-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8138999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81389992021-05-21 Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites Silva, Denise P. Villela, Helena D. M. Santos, Henrique F. Duarte, Gustavo A. S. Ribeiro, José Roberto Ghizelini, Angela M. Vilela, Caren L. S. Rosado, Phillipe M. Fazolato, Carolline S. Santoro, Erika P. Carmo, Flavia L. Ximenes, Dalton S. Soriano, Adriana U. Rachid, Caio T. C. C. Vega Thurber, Rebecca L. Peixoto, Raquel S. Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Beginning in the last century, coral reefs have suffered the consequences of anthropogenic activities, including oil contamination. Chemical remediation methods, such as dispersants, can cause substantial harm to corals and reduce their resilience to stressors. To evaluate the impacts of oil contamination and find potential alternative solutions to chemical dispersants, we conducted a mesocosm experiment with the fire coral Millepora alcicornis, which is sensitive to environmental changes. We exposed M. alcicornis to a realistic oil-spill scenario in which we applied an innovative multi-domain bioremediator consortium (bacteria, filamentous fungi, and yeast) and a chemical dispersant (Corexit® 9500, one of the most widely used dispersants), to assess the effects on host health and host-associated microbial communities. RESULTS: The selected multi-domain microbial consortium helped to mitigate the impacts of the oil, substantially degrading the polycyclic aromatic and n-alkane fractions and maintaining the physiological integrity of the corals. Exposure to Corexit 9500 negatively impacted the host physiology and altered the coral-associated microbial community. After exposure, the abundances of certain bacterial genera such as Rugeria and Roseovarius increased, as previously reported in stressed or diseased corals. We also identified several bioindicators of Corexit 9500 in the microbiome. The impact of Corexit 9500 on the coral health and microbial community was far greater than oil alone, killing corals after only 4 days of exposure in the flow-through system. In the treatments with Corexit 9500, the action of the bioremediator consortium could not be observed directly because of the extreme toxicity of the dispersant to M. alcicornis and its associated microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the importance of investigating the host-associated microbiome in order to detect and mitigate the effects of oil contamination on corals and the potential role of microbial mitigation and bioindicators as conservation tools. Chemical dispersants were far more damaging to corals and their associated microbiome than oil, and should not be used close to coral reefs. This study can aid in decision-making to minimize the negative effects of oil and dispersants on coral reefs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-021-01041-w. BioMed Central 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8138999/ /pubmed/34020712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01041-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Silva, Denise P. Villela, Helena D. M. Santos, Henrique F. Duarte, Gustavo A. S. Ribeiro, José Roberto Ghizelini, Angela M. Vilela, Caren L. S. Rosado, Phillipe M. Fazolato, Carolline S. Santoro, Erika P. Carmo, Flavia L. Ximenes, Dalton S. Soriano, Adriana U. Rachid, Caio T. C. C. Vega Thurber, Rebecca L. Peixoto, Raquel S. Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
title | Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
title_full | Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
title_fullStr | Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
title_short | Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
title_sort | multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8138999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01041-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvadenisep multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT villelahelenadm multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT santoshenriquef multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT duartegustavoas multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT ribeirojoseroberto multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT ghizeliniangelam multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT vilelacarenls multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT rosadophillipem multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT fazolatocarollines multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT santoroerikap multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT carmoflavial multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT ximenesdaltons multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT sorianoadrianau multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT rachidcaiotcc multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT vegathurberrebeccal multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites AT peixotoraquels multidomainprobioticconsortiumasanalternativetochemicalremediationofoilspillsatcoralreefsandadjacentsites |