Cargando…
Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC)
BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals can be a source of stigma and discrimination for people with mental illness, and anti-stigma programs are needed for this target group. However, there is no validated German language scale to assess attitudes of healthcare professionals towards people with mental...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00592-9 |
_version_ | 1783695929037029376 |
---|---|
author | Zuaboni, Gianfranco Elmer, Timon Rabenschlag, Franziska Heumann, Kolja Jaeger, Susanne Kozel, Bernd Mahlke, Candelaria I. Theodoridou, Anastasia Jaeger, Matthias Rsch, Nicolas |
author_facet | Zuaboni, Gianfranco Elmer, Timon Rabenschlag, Franziska Heumann, Kolja Jaeger, Susanne Kozel, Bernd Mahlke, Candelaria I. Theodoridou, Anastasia Jaeger, Matthias Rsch, Nicolas |
author_sort | Zuaboni, Gianfranco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals can be a source of stigma and discrimination for people with mental illness, and anti-stigma programs are needed for this target group. However, there is no validated German language scale to assess attitudes of healthcare professionals towards people with mental illness. This study had the aim to validate the German language version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), a self-report measure of stigmatizing attitudes. METHODS: Staff (n=392) on general psychiatric inpatient wards (excluding child, forensic and geriatric psychiatry) at five psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland (n=3) and Germany (n=2) participated in the study. The internal consistency of the OMS-HC was examined as well as its factor structure using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. To assess the scales concurrent validity, we used the Social Distance Scale. RESULTS: Internal consistency for the OMS-HC total score was good (=0.74), acceptable for the subscales Attitudes (=0.62) and Social Distance (=0.69), and poor for the Disclosure subscale (=0.55). The original three-factor structure fit our data well. The OMS-HC total score and the Social Distance subscale score were significantly correlated with the Social Distance Scale, supporting concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The German version of the OMS-HC demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and can be recommended for future research and intervention evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-021-00592-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8139058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81390582021-05-21 Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) Zuaboni, Gianfranco Elmer, Timon Rabenschlag, Franziska Heumann, Kolja Jaeger, Susanne Kozel, Bernd Mahlke, Candelaria I. Theodoridou, Anastasia Jaeger, Matthias Rsch, Nicolas BMC Psychol Research BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals can be a source of stigma and discrimination for people with mental illness, and anti-stigma programs are needed for this target group. However, there is no validated German language scale to assess attitudes of healthcare professionals towards people with mental illness. This study had the aim to validate the German language version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), a self-report measure of stigmatizing attitudes. METHODS: Staff (n=392) on general psychiatric inpatient wards (excluding child, forensic and geriatric psychiatry) at five psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland (n=3) and Germany (n=2) participated in the study. The internal consistency of the OMS-HC was examined as well as its factor structure using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. To assess the scales concurrent validity, we used the Social Distance Scale. RESULTS: Internal consistency for the OMS-HC total score was good (=0.74), acceptable for the subscales Attitudes (=0.62) and Social Distance (=0.69), and poor for the Disclosure subscale (=0.55). The original three-factor structure fit our data well. The OMS-HC total score and the Social Distance subscale score were significantly correlated with the Social Distance Scale, supporting concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The German version of the OMS-HC demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and can be recommended for future research and intervention evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-021-00592-9. BioMed Central 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8139058/ /pubmed/34016166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00592-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zuaboni, Gianfranco Elmer, Timon Rabenschlag, Franziska Heumann, Kolja Jaeger, Susanne Kozel, Bernd Mahlke, Candelaria I. Theodoridou, Anastasia Jaeger, Matthias Rsch, Nicolas Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) |
title | Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) |
title_full | Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) |
title_fullStr | Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) |
title_short | Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of the german version of the opening minds stigma scale for health care providers (oms-hc) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00592-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zuabonigianfranco psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT elmertimon psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT rabenschlagfranziska psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT heumannkolja psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT jaegersusanne psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT kozelbernd psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT mahlkecandelariai psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT theodoridouanastasia psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT jaegermatthias psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc AT rschnicolas psychometricevaluationofthegermanversionoftheopeningmindsstigmascaleforhealthcareprovidersomshc |