Cargando…

A qualitative approach to identify barriers to multi-professional teamwork among medical professors at Iranian teaching hospitals

BACKGROUND: In some cases of diseases, such as infectious, neurological and chronic ones prevention and treatment is complex. Therefore, a single medical specialty alone cannot effectively manage treatment of patients due to health care needs of them and complexities of treatment. Instead, a team co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazrati, Hakimeh, Arabshahi, Seyed Kamran Soltani, Bigdeli, Shoaleh, Behshid, Mozhgan, Sohrabi, Zohreh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06421-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In some cases of diseases, such as infectious, neurological and chronic ones prevention and treatment is complex. Therefore, a single medical specialty alone cannot effectively manage treatment of patients due to health care needs of them and complexities of treatment. Instead, a team composed of different healthcare disciplines with effective, continuous, and organized communication must follow up various aspects of patient care. In this regard, the present qualitative study aimed to shed light on the experiences of clinical teachers of multi-professional teamwork barriers within Iranian teaching hospitals. METHODS: In this qualitative research, the experiences of medical clinical teachers of multi-professional teamwork barriers within teaching hospitals were explained. Sampling was theoretical and the data were collected from experienced clinical teachers and medical students studying at several Universities of Medical Sciences through semi-structured interviews and observation, which were continued until data saturation. Fifteen clinical teachers and five medical students participated in the study. The interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Three main categories were extracted. The first category was enhancing the culture of interdisciplinary education included paving the way for an interdisciplinary culture, enhancing teamwork culture, and having a general view of medical sciences instead of specialization. The second category was barriers of interdisciplinary education included influence of the dominant culture of specialization in society, poor interdisciplinary education infrastructure, and individualism as a value of society. And the third category was consequences of specialization included medical sciences education under the shadow of specialization, possibility to harming patients, and distrust of society in the services provided by the 1st and 2nd level centers. CONCLUSION: It seems that attitudinal barriers, teamwork difficulties, and the culture of individualism are evident in Iran; more, roles of the healthcare team and the status of each member is not clear. Designing interactive curriculum and arranging clinical settings to facilitate exchange of ideas among clinical teachers and students of different disciplines, is a step forward to achieving a common value concept, language, and common perception, and establishing cooperation and understanding among disciplines involved, which leads to further understanding of the professional responsibilities of other disciplines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06421-4.