Cargando…
The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the importance of adopting effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in hospital and community settings. Ultraviolet (UV)-based technologies represent promising IPC tools: their effective application for sanitation has been extensively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34029626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.05.005 |
_version_ | 1783695997348610048 |
---|---|
author | Chiappa, F. Frascella, B. Vigezzi, G.P. Moro, M. Diamanti, L. Gentile, L. Lago, P. Clementi, N. Signorelli, C. Mancini, N. Odone, A. |
author_facet | Chiappa, F. Frascella, B. Vigezzi, G.P. Moro, M. Diamanti, L. Gentile, L. Lago, P. Clementi, N. Signorelli, C. Mancini, N. Odone, A. |
author_sort | Chiappa, F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the importance of adopting effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in hospital and community settings. Ultraviolet (UV)-based technologies represent promising IPC tools: their effective application for sanitation has been extensively evaluated in the past but scant, heterogeneous and inconclusive evidence is available on their effect on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. With the aim of pooling the available evidence on the efficacy of UV technologies against coronaviruses, we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library, and the main clinical trials' registries (WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane and EU Clinical Trial Register). Quantitative data on studies' interventions were summarized in tables, pooled by different coronavirus species and strain, UV source, characteristics of UV light exposure and outcomes. Eighteen papers met our inclusion criteria, published between 1972 and 2020. Six focused on SARS-CoV-2, four on SARS-CoV-1, one on MERS-CoV, three on seasonal coronaviruses, and four on animal coronaviruses. All were experimental studies. Overall, despite wide heterogenicity within included studies, complete inactivation of coronaviruses on surfaces or aerosolized, including SARS-CoV-2, was reported to take a maximum exposure time of 15 min and to need a maximum distance from the UV emitter of up to 1 m. Advances in UV-based technologies in the field of sanitation and their proved high virucidal potential against SARS-CoV-2 support their use for IPC in hospital and community settings and their contribution towards ending the COVID-19 pandemic. National and international guidelines are to be updated and parameters and conditions of use need to be identified to ensure both efficacy and safety of UV technology application for effective infection prevention and control in both healthcare and non-healthcare settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8139389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81393892021-05-24 The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review Chiappa, F. Frascella, B. Vigezzi, G.P. Moro, M. Diamanti, L. Gentile, L. Lago, P. Clementi, N. Signorelli, C. Mancini, N. Odone, A. J Hosp Infect Review The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the importance of adopting effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in hospital and community settings. Ultraviolet (UV)-based technologies represent promising IPC tools: their effective application for sanitation has been extensively evaluated in the past but scant, heterogeneous and inconclusive evidence is available on their effect on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. With the aim of pooling the available evidence on the efficacy of UV technologies against coronaviruses, we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library, and the main clinical trials' registries (WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane and EU Clinical Trial Register). Quantitative data on studies' interventions were summarized in tables, pooled by different coronavirus species and strain, UV source, characteristics of UV light exposure and outcomes. Eighteen papers met our inclusion criteria, published between 1972 and 2020. Six focused on SARS-CoV-2, four on SARS-CoV-1, one on MERS-CoV, three on seasonal coronaviruses, and four on animal coronaviruses. All were experimental studies. Overall, despite wide heterogenicity within included studies, complete inactivation of coronaviruses on surfaces or aerosolized, including SARS-CoV-2, was reported to take a maximum exposure time of 15 min and to need a maximum distance from the UV emitter of up to 1 m. Advances in UV-based technologies in the field of sanitation and their proved high virucidal potential against SARS-CoV-2 support their use for IPC in hospital and community settings and their contribution towards ending the COVID-19 pandemic. National and international guidelines are to be updated and parameters and conditions of use need to be identified to ensure both efficacy and safety of UV technology application for effective infection prevention and control in both healthcare and non-healthcare settings. The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-08 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8139389/ /pubmed/34029626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.05.005 Text en © 2021 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Chiappa, F. Frascella, B. Vigezzi, G.P. Moro, M. Diamanti, L. Gentile, L. Lago, P. Clementi, N. Signorelli, C. Mancini, N. Odone, A. The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
title | The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
title_full | The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
title_short | The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
title_sort | efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34029626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.05.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiappaf theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT frascellab theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT vigezzigp theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT morom theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT diamantil theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT gentilel theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT lagop theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT clementin theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT signorellic theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT mancinin theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT odonea theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT chiappaf efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT frascellab efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT vigezzigp efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT morom efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT diamantil efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT gentilel efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT lagop efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT clementin efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT signorellic efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT mancinin efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview AT odonea efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview |