Cargando…

The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review

The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the importance of adopting effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in hospital and community settings. Ultraviolet (UV)-based technologies represent promising IPC tools: their effective application for sanitation has been extensively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiappa, F., Frascella, B., Vigezzi, G.P., Moro, M., Diamanti, L., Gentile, L., Lago, P., Clementi, N., Signorelli, C., Mancini, N., Odone, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34029626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.05.005
_version_ 1783695997348610048
author Chiappa, F.
Frascella, B.
Vigezzi, G.P.
Moro, M.
Diamanti, L.
Gentile, L.
Lago, P.
Clementi, N.
Signorelli, C.
Mancini, N.
Odone, A.
author_facet Chiappa, F.
Frascella, B.
Vigezzi, G.P.
Moro, M.
Diamanti, L.
Gentile, L.
Lago, P.
Clementi, N.
Signorelli, C.
Mancini, N.
Odone, A.
author_sort Chiappa, F.
collection PubMed
description The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the importance of adopting effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in hospital and community settings. Ultraviolet (UV)-based technologies represent promising IPC tools: their effective application for sanitation has been extensively evaluated in the past but scant, heterogeneous and inconclusive evidence is available on their effect on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. With the aim of pooling the available evidence on the efficacy of UV technologies against coronaviruses, we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library, and the main clinical trials' registries (WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane and EU Clinical Trial Register). Quantitative data on studies' interventions were summarized in tables, pooled by different coronavirus species and strain, UV source, characteristics of UV light exposure and outcomes. Eighteen papers met our inclusion criteria, published between 1972 and 2020. Six focused on SARS-CoV-2, four on SARS-CoV-1, one on MERS-CoV, three on seasonal coronaviruses, and four on animal coronaviruses. All were experimental studies. Overall, despite wide heterogenicity within included studies, complete inactivation of coronaviruses on surfaces or aerosolized, including SARS-CoV-2, was reported to take a maximum exposure time of 15 min and to need a maximum distance from the UV emitter of up to 1 m. Advances in UV-based technologies in the field of sanitation and their proved high virucidal potential against SARS-CoV-2 support their use for IPC in hospital and community settings and their contribution towards ending the COVID-19 pandemic. National and international guidelines are to be updated and parameters and conditions of use need to be identified to ensure both efficacy and safety of UV technology application for effective infection prevention and control in both healthcare and non-healthcare settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8139389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81393892021-05-24 The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review Chiappa, F. Frascella, B. Vigezzi, G.P. Moro, M. Diamanti, L. Gentile, L. Lago, P. Clementi, N. Signorelli, C. Mancini, N. Odone, A. J Hosp Infect Review The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the importance of adopting effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in hospital and community settings. Ultraviolet (UV)-based technologies represent promising IPC tools: their effective application for sanitation has been extensively evaluated in the past but scant, heterogeneous and inconclusive evidence is available on their effect on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. With the aim of pooling the available evidence on the efficacy of UV technologies against coronaviruses, we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library, and the main clinical trials' registries (WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane and EU Clinical Trial Register). Quantitative data on studies' interventions were summarized in tables, pooled by different coronavirus species and strain, UV source, characteristics of UV light exposure and outcomes. Eighteen papers met our inclusion criteria, published between 1972 and 2020. Six focused on SARS-CoV-2, four on SARS-CoV-1, one on MERS-CoV, three on seasonal coronaviruses, and four on animal coronaviruses. All were experimental studies. Overall, despite wide heterogenicity within included studies, complete inactivation of coronaviruses on surfaces or aerosolized, including SARS-CoV-2, was reported to take a maximum exposure time of 15 min and to need a maximum distance from the UV emitter of up to 1 m. Advances in UV-based technologies in the field of sanitation and their proved high virucidal potential against SARS-CoV-2 support their use for IPC in hospital and community settings and their contribution towards ending the COVID-19 pandemic. National and international guidelines are to be updated and parameters and conditions of use need to be identified to ensure both efficacy and safety of UV technology application for effective infection prevention and control in both healthcare and non-healthcare settings. The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-08 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8139389/ /pubmed/34029626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.05.005 Text en © 2021 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Chiappa, F.
Frascella, B.
Vigezzi, G.P.
Moro, M.
Diamanti, L.
Gentile, L.
Lago, P.
Clementi, N.
Signorelli, C.
Mancini, N.
Odone, A.
The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
title The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
title_full The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
title_fullStr The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
title_short The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34029626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.05.005
work_keys_str_mv AT chiappaf theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT frascellab theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT vigezzigp theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT morom theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT diamantil theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT gentilel theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT lagop theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT clementin theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT signorellic theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT mancinin theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT odonea theefficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT chiappaf efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT frascellab efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT vigezzigp efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT morom efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT diamantil efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT gentilel efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT lagop efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT clementin efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT signorellic efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT mancinin efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview
AT odonea efficacyofultravioletlightemittingtechnologyagainstcoronavirusesasystematicreview