Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review

Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery but its uptake has been low in clinical and research settings. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly in cardiovascular settings, are unclear. The objective of this review was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitelaw, Sera, Pellegrini, Danielle M, Mamas, Mamas A, Cowie, Martin, Van Spall, Harriette G C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34048508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005
_version_ 1783696001832321024
author Whitelaw, Sera
Pellegrini, Danielle M
Mamas, Mamas A
Cowie, Martin
Van Spall, Harriette G C
author_facet Whitelaw, Sera
Pellegrini, Danielle M
Mamas, Mamas A
Cowie, Martin
Van Spall, Harriette G C
author_sort Whitelaw, Sera
collection PubMed
description Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery but its uptake has been low in clinical and research settings. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly in cardiovascular settings, are unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake from the perspective of patients, clinicians, and researchers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published from inception to May 2020 that reported barriers and/or facilitators of DHT adoption in cardiovascular care. We extracted data on study design, setting, cardiovascular condition, and type of DHT. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake. The search identified 3075 unique studies, of which 29 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies employed: qualitative methods (n = 13), which included interviews and focus groups; quantitative methods (n = 5), which included surveys; or a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (n = 11). Twenty-five studies reported patient-level barriers, most common of which were difficult-to-use technology (n = 7) and a poor internet connection (n = 7). Six studies reported clinician-level barriers, which included increased workload (n = 4) and a lack of integration with electronic medical records (n = 3).Twenty-four studies reported patient-level facilitators, which included improved communication with clinicians (n = 10) and personalized technology (n = 6). Four studies reported clinician-level facilitators, which included approval and organizational support from cardiology departments and/or hospitals (n = 3) and technologies that improved efficiency (n = 3). No studies reported researcher-level barriers or facilitators. In summary, internet access, user-friendliness, organizational support, workflow efficiency, and data integration were reported as important factors in the uptake of DHT by patients and clinicians. These factors can be considered when selecting and implementing DHTs in cardiovascular clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8139413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81394132021-05-25 Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review Whitelaw, Sera Pellegrini, Danielle M Mamas, Mamas A Cowie, Martin Van Spall, Harriette G C Eur Heart J Digit Health Review Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery but its uptake has been low in clinical and research settings. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly in cardiovascular settings, are unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake from the perspective of patients, clinicians, and researchers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published from inception to May 2020 that reported barriers and/or facilitators of DHT adoption in cardiovascular care. We extracted data on study design, setting, cardiovascular condition, and type of DHT. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake. The search identified 3075 unique studies, of which 29 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies employed: qualitative methods (n = 13), which included interviews and focus groups; quantitative methods (n = 5), which included surveys; or a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (n = 11). Twenty-five studies reported patient-level barriers, most common of which were difficult-to-use technology (n = 7) and a poor internet connection (n = 7). Six studies reported clinician-level barriers, which included increased workload (n = 4) and a lack of integration with electronic medical records (n = 3).Twenty-four studies reported patient-level facilitators, which included improved communication with clinicians (n = 10) and personalized technology (n = 6). Four studies reported clinician-level facilitators, which included approval and organizational support from cardiology departments and/or hospitals (n = 3) and technologies that improved efficiency (n = 3). No studies reported researcher-level barriers or facilitators. In summary, internet access, user-friendliness, organizational support, workflow efficiency, and data integration were reported as important factors in the uptake of DHT by patients and clinicians. These factors can be considered when selecting and implementing DHTs in cardiovascular clinical settings. Oxford University Press 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8139413/ /pubmed/34048508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review
Whitelaw, Sera
Pellegrini, Danielle M
Mamas, Mamas A
Cowie, Martin
Van Spall, Harriette G C
Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
title Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
title_full Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
title_short Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
title_sort barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34048508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005
work_keys_str_mv AT whitelawsera barriersandfacilitatorsoftheuptakeofdigitalhealthtechnologyincardiovascularcareasystematicscopingreview
AT pellegrinidaniellem barriersandfacilitatorsoftheuptakeofdigitalhealthtechnologyincardiovascularcareasystematicscopingreview
AT mamasmamasa barriersandfacilitatorsoftheuptakeofdigitalhealthtechnologyincardiovascularcareasystematicscopingreview
AT cowiemartin barriersandfacilitatorsoftheuptakeofdigitalhealthtechnologyincardiovascularcareasystematicscopingreview
AT vanspallharriettegc barriersandfacilitatorsoftheuptakeofdigitalhealthtechnologyincardiovascularcareasystematicscopingreview