Cargando…

Development and ex-vivo assessment of a novel patient specific guide and instrumentation system for minimally invasive total shoulder arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess a novel guidance technique and instrumentation system for minimally invasive short-stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty that will help to reduce the complications associated with traditional open replacement such as poor muscle healing and neurovascular injury. We hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Joshua W., Brodén, Cyrus, Tempelaere, Christine, Emery, Roger J. H., Rodriguez y Baena, Ferdinando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251880
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess a novel guidance technique and instrumentation system for minimally invasive short-stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty that will help to reduce the complications associated with traditional open replacement such as poor muscle healing and neurovascular injury. We have answered key questions about the developed system including (1) can novel patient-specific guides be accurately registered and used within a minimally invasive environment?; (2) can accuracy similar to traditional techniques be achieved? METHODS: A novel intra-articular patient-specific guide was developed for use with a new minimally invasive posterior surgical approach that guides bone preparation without requiring muscle resection or joint dislocation. Additionally, a novel set of instruments were developed to enable bone preparation within the minimally invasive environment. The full procedure was evaluated in six cadaveric shoulders, using digitizations to assess accuracy of each step. RESULTS: Patient-specific guide registration accuracy in 3D translation was 2.2±1.2mm (RMSE±1 SD; p = 0.007) for the humeral component and 2.7±0.7mm (p<0.001) for the scapula component. Final implantation accuracy was 2.9±3.0mm (p = 0.066) in translation and 5.7–6.8±2.2–4.0° (0.001<p<0.009) across the humerus implants’ three rotations. Similarly, the glenoid component’s implantation accuracy was 3.0±1.7mm (p = 0.008) in translation and 2.3–4.3±2.2–4.4° (0.008<p<0.09) in rotation. CONCLUSION: This system achieves minimally invasive shoulder replacement with accuracy similar to traditional open techniques while avoiding common causes of complications. SIGNIFICANCE: This novel technique could lead to a paradigm shift in shoulder arthroplasty for patients with moderate arthritis, which could significantly improve rehabilitation and functional outcomes.