Cargando…

Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study

BACKGROUND: To investigate the differences in survival between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection for elderly stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. METHOD: The data of stage IA elderly NSCLC patients (≥ 70 years) wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bo, Liu, Renwang, Ren, Dian, Li, Xiongfei, Wang, Yanye, Huo, Huandong, Zhu, Shuai, Chen, Jun, Song, Zuoqing, Xu, Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.610638
_version_ 1783696043122098176
author Zhang, Bo
Liu, Renwang
Ren, Dian
Li, Xiongfei
Wang, Yanye
Huo, Huandong
Zhu, Shuai
Chen, Jun
Song, Zuoqing
Xu, Song
author_facet Zhang, Bo
Liu, Renwang
Ren, Dian
Li, Xiongfei
Wang, Yanye
Huo, Huandong
Zhu, Shuai
Chen, Jun
Song, Zuoqing
Xu, Song
author_sort Zhang, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the differences in survival between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection for elderly stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. METHOD: The data of stage IA elderly NSCLC patients (≥ 70 years) with tumors less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter were extracted. Propensity-matched analysis was used. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among the patients after lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The proportional hazards model was applied to identify multiple prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 3,504 patients met criteria after propensity score matching (PSM). Although the LCSS was better for lobectomy than for sub-lobar resection in patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm before PSM (p < 0.001), no significant difference in the LCSS was identified between the two treatment groups after PSM (p = 0.191). Multivariate Cox regression showed the elder age, male gender, squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) histology type, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were associated with poor LCSS. The subgroup analysis of tumor sizes, histologic types and lymph nodes (LNs) dissection, there were also no significant difference for LCSS between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The sub-lobar resection was further divided into segmentectomy or wedge resection, and it demonstrated that no significant differences in LCSS were identified among the treatment subgroups either. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the elder age, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were a statistically significant independent factor associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In terms of LCSS, lobectomy has no significant advantage over sub-lobar resection in elderly patients with stage IA NSCLC if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. The present data may contribute to develop a more suitable surgical treatment strategy for the stage IA elderly NSCLC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8139614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81396142021-05-22 Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study Zhang, Bo Liu, Renwang Ren, Dian Li, Xiongfei Wang, Yanye Huo, Huandong Zhu, Shuai Chen, Jun Song, Zuoqing Xu, Song Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: To investigate the differences in survival between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection for elderly stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. METHOD: The data of stage IA elderly NSCLC patients (≥ 70 years) with tumors less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter were extracted. Propensity-matched analysis was used. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among the patients after lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The proportional hazards model was applied to identify multiple prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 3,504 patients met criteria after propensity score matching (PSM). Although the LCSS was better for lobectomy than for sub-lobar resection in patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm before PSM (p < 0.001), no significant difference in the LCSS was identified between the two treatment groups after PSM (p = 0.191). Multivariate Cox regression showed the elder age, male gender, squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) histology type, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were associated with poor LCSS. The subgroup analysis of tumor sizes, histologic types and lymph nodes (LNs) dissection, there were also no significant difference for LCSS between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The sub-lobar resection was further divided into segmentectomy or wedge resection, and it demonstrated that no significant differences in LCSS were identified among the treatment subgroups either. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the elder age, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were a statistically significant independent factor associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In terms of LCSS, lobectomy has no significant advantage over sub-lobar resection in elderly patients with stage IA NSCLC if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. The present data may contribute to develop a more suitable surgical treatment strategy for the stage IA elderly NSCLC patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8139614/ /pubmed/34026604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.610638 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Liu, Ren, Li, Wang, Huo, Zhu, Chen, Song and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Bo
Liu, Renwang
Ren, Dian
Li, Xiongfei
Wang, Yanye
Huo, Huandong
Zhu, Shuai
Chen, Jun
Song, Zuoqing
Xu, Song
Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study
title Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study
title_full Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study
title_short Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching’s Study
title_sort comparison of lobectomy and sublobar resection for stage ia elderly nsclc patients (≥70 years): a population-based propensity score matching’s study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.610638
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbo comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT liurenwang comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT rendian comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT lixiongfei comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT wangyanye comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT huohuandong comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT zhushuai comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT chenjun comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT songzuoqing comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy
AT xusong comparisonoflobectomyandsublobarresectionforstageiaelderlynsclcpatients70yearsapopulationbasedpropensityscorematchingsstudy