Cargando…
Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa345 |
_version_ | 1783696067028582400 |
---|---|
author | de Jong, Jelle S Y Blok, Minou R Snijders Thijs, Roland D Harms, Mark P M Hemels, Martin E W de Groot, Joris R van Dijk, Nynke de Lange, Frederik J |
author_facet | de Jong, Jelle S Y Blok, Minou R Snijders Thijs, Roland D Harms, Mark P M Hemels, Martin E W de Groot, Joris R van Dijk, Nynke de Lange, Frederik J |
author_sort | de Jong, Jelle S Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years) referred with at least one self-reported episode of transient loss of consciousness and presenting to the syncope unit between October 2012 and February 2015. The study consisted of three phases: history taking (Phase 1), autonomic function tests (AFTs) (Phase 2), and after 1.5-year follow-up with assessment by a multidisciplinary committee (Phase 3). Diagnostic yield was assessed after Phases 1 and 2. Empirical diagnostic accuracy was measured for diagnoses according to the ESC guidelines after Phase 3. The diagnostic yield after Phase 1 (history taking) was 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1–97.0%, 250/264 patients) and increased to 97.0% (93.9–98.6%, 256/264 patients) after Phase 2. The overall diagnostic accuracy (as established in Phase 3) of the Phases 1 and 2 diagnoses was 90.6% (95% CI: 86.2–93.8%, 232/256 patients). No life-threatening conditions were missed. Three patients died, two unrelated to the cause of transient loss of consciousness, and one whom remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION : A clinical work-up at a tertiary syncope unit using the ESC guidelines has a high diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety. History taking (Phase 1) is the most important diagnostic tool. Autonomic function tests never changed the Phase 1 diagnosis but helped to increase the certainty of the Phase 1 diagnosis in many patients and yield additional diagnoses in patients who remained undiagnosed after Phase 1. Diagnoses were inaccurate in 9.4%, but no serious conditions were missed. This is adequate for clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8139816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81398162021-05-25 Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study de Jong, Jelle S Y Blok, Minou R Snijders Thijs, Roland D Harms, Mark P M Hemels, Martin E W de Groot, Joris R van Dijk, Nynke de Lange, Frederik J Europace Clinical Research AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years) referred with at least one self-reported episode of transient loss of consciousness and presenting to the syncope unit between October 2012 and February 2015. The study consisted of three phases: history taking (Phase 1), autonomic function tests (AFTs) (Phase 2), and after 1.5-year follow-up with assessment by a multidisciplinary committee (Phase 3). Diagnostic yield was assessed after Phases 1 and 2. Empirical diagnostic accuracy was measured for diagnoses according to the ESC guidelines after Phase 3. The diagnostic yield after Phase 1 (history taking) was 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1–97.0%, 250/264 patients) and increased to 97.0% (93.9–98.6%, 256/264 patients) after Phase 2. The overall diagnostic accuracy (as established in Phase 3) of the Phases 1 and 2 diagnoses was 90.6% (95% CI: 86.2–93.8%, 232/256 patients). No life-threatening conditions were missed. Three patients died, two unrelated to the cause of transient loss of consciousness, and one whom remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION : A clinical work-up at a tertiary syncope unit using the ESC guidelines has a high diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety. History taking (Phase 1) is the most important diagnostic tool. Autonomic function tests never changed the Phase 1 diagnosis but helped to increase the certainty of the Phase 1 diagnosis in many patients and yield additional diagnoses in patients who remained undiagnosed after Phase 1. Diagnoses were inaccurate in 9.4%, but no serious conditions were missed. This is adequate for clinical practice. Oxford University Press 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8139816/ /pubmed/33219671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa345 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research de Jong, Jelle S Y Blok, Minou R Snijders Thijs, Roland D Harms, Mark P M Hemels, Martin E W de Groot, Joris R van Dijk, Nynke de Lange, Frederik J Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
title | Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the esc guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongjellesy diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT blokminoursnijders diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT thijsrolandd diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT harmsmarkpm diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT hemelsmartinew diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT degrootjorisr diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT vandijknynke diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy AT delangefrederikj diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy |