Cargando…

Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study

AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Jelle S Y, Blok, Minou R Snijders, Thijs, Roland D, Harms, Mark P M, Hemels, Martin E W, de Groot, Joris R, van Dijk, Nynke, de Lange, Frederik J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa345
_version_ 1783696067028582400
author de Jong, Jelle S Y
Blok, Minou R Snijders
Thijs, Roland D
Harms, Mark P M
Hemels, Martin E W
de Groot, Joris R
van Dijk, Nynke
de Lange, Frederik J
author_facet de Jong, Jelle S Y
Blok, Minou R Snijders
Thijs, Roland D
Harms, Mark P M
Hemels, Martin E W
de Groot, Joris R
van Dijk, Nynke
de Lange, Frederik J
author_sort de Jong, Jelle S Y
collection PubMed
description AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years) referred with at least one self-reported episode of transient loss of consciousness and presenting to the syncope unit between October 2012 and February 2015. The study consisted of three phases: history taking (Phase 1), autonomic function tests (AFTs) (Phase 2), and after 1.5-year follow-up with assessment by a multidisciplinary committee (Phase 3). Diagnostic yield was assessed after Phases 1 and 2. Empirical diagnostic accuracy was measured for diagnoses according to the ESC guidelines after Phase 3. The diagnostic yield after Phase 1 (history taking) was 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1–97.0%, 250/264 patients) and increased to 97.0% (93.9–98.6%, 256/264 patients) after Phase 2. The overall diagnostic accuracy (as established in Phase 3) of the Phases 1 and 2 diagnoses was 90.6% (95% CI: 86.2–93.8%, 232/256 patients). No life-threatening conditions were missed. Three patients died, two unrelated to the cause of transient loss of consciousness, and one whom remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION : A clinical work-up at a tertiary syncope unit using the ESC guidelines has a high diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety. History taking (Phase 1) is the most important diagnostic tool. Autonomic function tests never changed the Phase 1 diagnosis but helped to increase the certainty of the Phase 1 diagnosis in many patients and yield additional diagnoses in patients who remained undiagnosed after Phase 1. Diagnoses were inaccurate in 9.4%, but no serious conditions were missed. This is adequate for clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8139816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81398162021-05-25 Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study de Jong, Jelle S Y Blok, Minou R Snijders Thijs, Roland D Harms, Mark P M Hemels, Martin E W de Groot, Joris R van Dijk, Nynke de Lange, Frederik J Europace Clinical Research AIMS : To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS : Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years) referred with at least one self-reported episode of transient loss of consciousness and presenting to the syncope unit between October 2012 and February 2015. The study consisted of three phases: history taking (Phase 1), autonomic function tests (AFTs) (Phase 2), and after 1.5-year follow-up with assessment by a multidisciplinary committee (Phase 3). Diagnostic yield was assessed after Phases 1 and 2. Empirical diagnostic accuracy was measured for diagnoses according to the ESC guidelines after Phase 3. The diagnostic yield after Phase 1 (history taking) was 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1–97.0%, 250/264 patients) and increased to 97.0% (93.9–98.6%, 256/264 patients) after Phase 2. The overall diagnostic accuracy (as established in Phase 3) of the Phases 1 and 2 diagnoses was 90.6% (95% CI: 86.2–93.8%, 232/256 patients). No life-threatening conditions were missed. Three patients died, two unrelated to the cause of transient loss of consciousness, and one whom remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION : A clinical work-up at a tertiary syncope unit using the ESC guidelines has a high diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety. History taking (Phase 1) is the most important diagnostic tool. Autonomic function tests never changed the Phase 1 diagnosis but helped to increase the certainty of the Phase 1 diagnosis in many patients and yield additional diagnoses in patients who remained undiagnosed after Phase 1. Diagnoses were inaccurate in 9.4%, but no serious conditions were missed. This is adequate for clinical practice. Oxford University Press 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8139816/ /pubmed/33219671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa345 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
de Jong, Jelle S Y
Blok, Minou R Snijders
Thijs, Roland D
Harms, Mark P M
Hemels, Martin E W
de Groot, Joris R
van Dijk, Nynke
de Lange, Frederik J
Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
title Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
title_full Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
title_short Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
title_sort diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the esc guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa345
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongjellesy diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT blokminoursnijders diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT thijsrolandd diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT harmsmarkpm diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hemelsmartinew diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT degrootjorisr diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vandijknynke diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT delangefrederikj diagnosticyieldandaccuracyinatertiaryreferralsyncopeunitvalidatingtheescguidelineonsyncopeaprospectivecohortstudy