Cargando…

Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND

INTRODUCTION: This post hoc subset analysis of RESPOND evaluated the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) 240 mg twice daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate (GA; “first switch” patients), including patients with early MS (“early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Repovic, Pavle, Robertson, Derrick, Kresa-Reahl, Kiren, Cohan, Stanley L., Su, Ray, Avila, Robin, Koulinska, Irene, Mendoza, Jason P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2
_version_ 1783696105334112256
author Repovic, Pavle
Robertson, Derrick
Kresa-Reahl, Kiren
Cohan, Stanley L.
Su, Ray
Avila, Robin
Koulinska, Irene
Mendoza, Jason P.
author_facet Repovic, Pavle
Robertson, Derrick
Kresa-Reahl, Kiren
Cohan, Stanley L.
Su, Ray
Avila, Robin
Koulinska, Irene
Mendoza, Jason P.
author_sort Repovic, Pavle
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This post hoc subset analysis of RESPOND evaluated the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) 240 mg twice daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate (GA; “first switch” patients), including patients with early MS (“early MS switch” patients). METHODS: Patients had discontinued GA due to suboptimal response and initiated DMF treatment within 60 days after enrollment. Relapse data were collected from medical records. First switch patients had had one prior approved MS therapy (GA) before initiating DMF treatment. Early MS switch patients were first switch patients with baseline Patient-Reported Expanded Disability Status Scale (PR-EDSS) score ≤ 3.5, ≤ 1 relapses in the past 1 year, or both. RESULTS: Among first switch patients (n = 231), the annualized relapse rate (ARR) was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–0.58) for 12 months before DMF initiation and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06–0.18) for 12 months after DMF initiation, a 78% decrease in ARR. Among early MS switch patients with baseline PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5 (n = 120), ≤ 1 relapses in the prior year (n = 219), or both (n = 114), the ARRs (95% CIs) for 12 months before DMF initiation were 0.47 (0.37–0.59), 0.37 (0.32–0.44), and 0.39 (0.31–0.49), respectively; values for 12 months after DMF initiation were 0.06 (0.02–0.19), 0.09 (0.05–0.17), and 0.06 (0.02–0.20), respectively, an 87, 75, and 83% decrease in ARR. The proportion of patients relapse-free 12 months after DMF initiation versus 12 months before were 94 versus 59% in first switch patients, and 97 versus 58%, 94 versus 63%, and 97 versus 61% in early MS switch patients in the PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5, ≤ 1 relapses in the prior year, or PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5 and ≤ 1 relapses subgroups, respectively. After 12 months of DMF treatment, most patient-reported outcomes scores showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: DMF may be an effective treatment option in first switch and early MS switch patients with RMS who experience a suboptimal response to GA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01903291. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8140000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81400002021-06-03 Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND Repovic, Pavle Robertson, Derrick Kresa-Reahl, Kiren Cohan, Stanley L. Su, Ray Avila, Robin Koulinska, Irene Mendoza, Jason P. Neurol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This post hoc subset analysis of RESPOND evaluated the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) 240 mg twice daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate (GA; “first switch” patients), including patients with early MS (“early MS switch” patients). METHODS: Patients had discontinued GA due to suboptimal response and initiated DMF treatment within 60 days after enrollment. Relapse data were collected from medical records. First switch patients had had one prior approved MS therapy (GA) before initiating DMF treatment. Early MS switch patients were first switch patients with baseline Patient-Reported Expanded Disability Status Scale (PR-EDSS) score ≤ 3.5, ≤ 1 relapses in the past 1 year, or both. RESULTS: Among first switch patients (n = 231), the annualized relapse rate (ARR) was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–0.58) for 12 months before DMF initiation and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06–0.18) for 12 months after DMF initiation, a 78% decrease in ARR. Among early MS switch patients with baseline PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5 (n = 120), ≤ 1 relapses in the prior year (n = 219), or both (n = 114), the ARRs (95% CIs) for 12 months before DMF initiation were 0.47 (0.37–0.59), 0.37 (0.32–0.44), and 0.39 (0.31–0.49), respectively; values for 12 months after DMF initiation were 0.06 (0.02–0.19), 0.09 (0.05–0.17), and 0.06 (0.02–0.20), respectively, an 87, 75, and 83% decrease in ARR. The proportion of patients relapse-free 12 months after DMF initiation versus 12 months before were 94 versus 59% in first switch patients, and 97 versus 58%, 94 versus 63%, and 97 versus 61% in early MS switch patients in the PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5, ≤ 1 relapses in the prior year, or PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5 and ≤ 1 relapses subgroups, respectively. After 12 months of DMF treatment, most patient-reported outcomes scores showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: DMF may be an effective treatment option in first switch and early MS switch patients with RMS who experience a suboptimal response to GA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01903291. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8140000/ /pubmed/33225410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Repovic, Pavle
Robertson, Derrick
Kresa-Reahl, Kiren
Cohan, Stanley L.
Su, Ray
Avila, Robin
Koulinska, Irene
Mendoza, Jason P.
Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND
title Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND
title_full Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND
title_short Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND
title_sort effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis switching after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate, including patients with early multiple sclerosis: subgroup analysis of respond
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2
work_keys_str_mv AT repovicpavle effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT robertsonderrick effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT kresareahlkiren effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT cohanstanleyl effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT suray effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT avilarobin effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT koulinskairene effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond
AT mendozajasonp effectivenessofdimethylfumarateinpatientswithrelapsingmultiplesclerosisswitchingaftersuboptimalresponsetoglatirameracetateincludingpatientswithearlymultiplesclerosissubgroupanalysisofrespond