Cargando…
Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated work and activity impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) versus other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: Data were obtained from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Multiple Sclerosis. Patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1 |
_version_ | 1783696109203357696 |
---|---|
author | Neuberger, Edward E. Abbass, Ibrahim M. Jones, Eddie Engmann, Natalie J. |
author_facet | Neuberger, Edward E. Abbass, Ibrahim M. Jones, Eddie Engmann, Natalie J. |
author_sort | Neuberger, Edward E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated work and activity impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) versus other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: Data were obtained from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Multiple Sclerosis. Patients with relapsing–remitting or secondary progressive MS who completed surveys in 2018 and 2019 and received ≥ 6 months of an eligible therapy, including OCR, injectable therapy, and oral therapy, were included. Outcomes were assessed using the patient-reported Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Doubly robust estimation, which combined propensity score weighting and regression modeling, was used to compare treatments, controlling for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: This study included 630 patients (OCR, n = 90; injectable DMT, n = 224; oral DMT, n = 316) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42 (11) years. A greater proportion of OCR-treated patients had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≥ 3 at treatment initiation compared with those receiving oral and injectable DMTs (51 vs. 15% and 15%, respectively), and a smaller proportion of OCR-treated patients received treatment for ≥ 1 year (43 vs. 90% and 92%, respectively). OCR-treated patients had higher odds of employment [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.4 (1.5–7.7) vs. oral DMT, 5.6 (2.6–12.0) vs. injectable DMT], lower overall work productivity loss [difference (95% confidence interval) − 10.0% (− 6.1 to − 15.0%) vs. oral DMT, − 13.0% (− 8.5 to − 17.0%) vs. injectable DMT] and lower activity impairment [difference (95% confidence interval) − 11% (− 7.1 to − 16.0%) vs. oral DMT, − 9.7% (− 5.0 to − 14.0%) vs. injectable DMT]. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence suggests that patients with MS treated with OCR experience lower work and activity impairment than patients treated with other DMTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8140023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81400232021-06-03 Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis Neuberger, Edward E. Abbass, Ibrahim M. Jones, Eddie Engmann, Natalie J. Neurol Ther Original Research OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated work and activity impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) versus other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: Data were obtained from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Multiple Sclerosis. Patients with relapsing–remitting or secondary progressive MS who completed surveys in 2018 and 2019 and received ≥ 6 months of an eligible therapy, including OCR, injectable therapy, and oral therapy, were included. Outcomes were assessed using the patient-reported Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Doubly robust estimation, which combined propensity score weighting and regression modeling, was used to compare treatments, controlling for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: This study included 630 patients (OCR, n = 90; injectable DMT, n = 224; oral DMT, n = 316) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42 (11) years. A greater proportion of OCR-treated patients had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≥ 3 at treatment initiation compared with those receiving oral and injectable DMTs (51 vs. 15% and 15%, respectively), and a smaller proportion of OCR-treated patients received treatment for ≥ 1 year (43 vs. 90% and 92%, respectively). OCR-treated patients had higher odds of employment [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.4 (1.5–7.7) vs. oral DMT, 5.6 (2.6–12.0) vs. injectable DMT], lower overall work productivity loss [difference (95% confidence interval) − 10.0% (− 6.1 to − 15.0%) vs. oral DMT, − 13.0% (− 8.5 to − 17.0%) vs. injectable DMT] and lower activity impairment [difference (95% confidence interval) − 11% (− 7.1 to − 16.0%) vs. oral DMT, − 9.7% (− 5.0 to − 14.0%) vs. injectable DMT]. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence suggests that patients with MS treated with OCR experience lower work and activity impairment than patients treated with other DMTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8140023/ /pubmed/33244713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Neuberger, Edward E. Abbass, Ibrahim M. Jones, Eddie Engmann, Natalie J. Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis |
title | Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis |
title_full | Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis |
title_short | Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis |
title_sort | work productivity outcomes associated with ocrelizumab compared with other disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neubergeredwarde workproductivityoutcomesassociatedwithocrelizumabcomparedwithotherdiseasemodifyingtherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT abbassibrahimm workproductivityoutcomesassociatedwithocrelizumabcomparedwithotherdiseasemodifyingtherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT joneseddie workproductivityoutcomesassociatedwithocrelizumabcomparedwithotherdiseasemodifyingtherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT engmannnataliej workproductivityoutcomesassociatedwithocrelizumabcomparedwithotherdiseasemodifyingtherapiesformultiplesclerosis |