Cargando…

Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is the most frequent ligamentous injury of the knee joint. Autografts of hamstring (HS) or quadriceps tendons (QT) are used for primary ACL reconstruction. In this study, we planned to examine whether harvesting an HS graft is related to a deficit in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schagemann, J., Koebrich, T., Wendlandt, R., Schulz, A. P., Gille, J., Oheim, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00581-z
_version_ 1783696137559998464
author Schagemann, J.
Koebrich, T.
Wendlandt, R.
Schulz, A. P.
Gille, J.
Oheim, R.
author_facet Schagemann, J.
Koebrich, T.
Wendlandt, R.
Schulz, A. P.
Gille, J.
Oheim, R.
author_sort Schagemann, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is the most frequent ligamentous injury of the knee joint. Autografts of hamstring (HS) or quadriceps tendons (QT) are used for primary ACL reconstruction. In this study, we planned to examine whether harvesting an HS graft is related to a deficit in dynamic knee stabilisation and strength revealed by dynamic valgus as compared with QT graft or the uninjured leg. Furthermore, if this deficit exists, is it compensated by higher neuromuscular activity of the quadriceps muscle? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with QT or HS autografts were included in this two-armed cohort study. Clinical outcome was assessed by clinical data analysis, physical examination and the Lysholm Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS). In addition, gait analysis and non-invasive surface electromyography were performed. RESULTS: A complete data set of 25 patients (QT: N = 8, HS: N = 17) was analysed. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. Time between surgery and follow-up was significantly longer for the QT group. Significant differences regarding clinical outcome were not found between the treated and untreated leg or between the two groups, with excellent scores at the time of follow-up. Gait analysis revealed no significant differences of varus–valgus angles. Significant differences in surface electromyography were only found in the QT group with increased vastus medialis obliquus activity of the treated legs (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that harvesting of HS grafts for primary ACL reconstruction will not lead to a medial collapse and consequently impaired medial stabilisation of the knee when compared with QT grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8140171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81401712021-06-07 Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography Schagemann, J. Koebrich, T. Wendlandt, R. Schulz, A. P. Gille, J. Oheim, R. J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is the most frequent ligamentous injury of the knee joint. Autografts of hamstring (HS) or quadriceps tendons (QT) are used for primary ACL reconstruction. In this study, we planned to examine whether harvesting an HS graft is related to a deficit in dynamic knee stabilisation and strength revealed by dynamic valgus as compared with QT graft or the uninjured leg. Furthermore, if this deficit exists, is it compensated by higher neuromuscular activity of the quadriceps muscle? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with QT or HS autografts were included in this two-armed cohort study. Clinical outcome was assessed by clinical data analysis, physical examination and the Lysholm Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS). In addition, gait analysis and non-invasive surface electromyography were performed. RESULTS: A complete data set of 25 patients (QT: N = 8, HS: N = 17) was analysed. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. Time between surgery and follow-up was significantly longer for the QT group. Significant differences regarding clinical outcome were not found between the treated and untreated leg or between the two groups, with excellent scores at the time of follow-up. Gait analysis revealed no significant differences of varus–valgus angles. Significant differences in surface electromyography were only found in the QT group with increased vastus medialis obliquus activity of the treated legs (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that harvesting of HS grafts for primary ACL reconstruction will not lead to a medial collapse and consequently impaired medial stabilisation of the knee when compared with QT grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-21 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8140171/ /pubmed/34021423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00581-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Schagemann, J.
Koebrich, T.
Wendlandt, R.
Schulz, A. P.
Gille, J.
Oheim, R.
Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
title Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
title_full Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
title_fullStr Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
title_short Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
title_sort comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00581-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schagemannj comparisonofhamstringandquadricepstendonautograftsinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithgaitanalysisandsurfaceelectromyography
AT koebricht comparisonofhamstringandquadricepstendonautograftsinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithgaitanalysisandsurfaceelectromyography
AT wendlandtr comparisonofhamstringandquadricepstendonautograftsinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithgaitanalysisandsurfaceelectromyography
AT schulzap comparisonofhamstringandquadricepstendonautograftsinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithgaitanalysisandsurfaceelectromyography
AT gillej comparisonofhamstringandquadricepstendonautograftsinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithgaitanalysisandsurfaceelectromyography
AT oheimr comparisonofhamstringandquadricepstendonautograftsinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithgaitanalysisandsurfaceelectromyography