Cargando…

Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements

BACKGROUND: Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snow, John Charles, Simpson, Kyle, Rahman, Proton, Howarth, Samuel, De Carvalho, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04352-z
_version_ 1783696191694831616
author Snow, John Charles
Simpson, Kyle
Rahman, Proton
Howarth, Samuel
De Carvalho, Diana
author_facet Snow, John Charles
Simpson, Kyle
Rahman, Proton
Howarth, Samuel
De Carvalho, Diana
author_sort Snow, John Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method of measuring spine mobility using tri-axial accelerometers. METHODS: Fifteen radiographic-Spondyloarthritis patients were recruited for this study. Two postural reference radiographs, followed by three trials in forward, left and right lateral bending were taken. For all trials, three measurements were collected: tape (Original Schober’s, Modified Schober’s, Modified-Modified Schober’s, Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test), followed immediately by synchronized radiograph and accelerometer measurements at end range of forward and bilateral lateral flexion. The criterion-concurrent validity of all measurement methods was compared to the radiographic measures using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess agreement. RESULTS: In forward bending, the accelerometer method (r = 0.590, p = 0.010) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measures than all tape measures. In lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion tape measure (r = 0.743, p = 0.001) correlated stronger than the accelerometer method (r = 0.556, p = 0.016). The Domjan test of bilateral bending (r = 0.708, p = 0.002) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measure than the accelerometer method. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer measures demonstrated superior criterion-concurrent validity compared to current tape measures of spinal mobility in forward bending. While a moderate correlation exists between accelerometer and radiographs in lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test were found to have the best criterion-concurrent validity of all tests examined in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8140455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81404552021-05-25 Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements Snow, John Charles Simpson, Kyle Rahman, Proton Howarth, Samuel De Carvalho, Diana BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method of measuring spine mobility using tri-axial accelerometers. METHODS: Fifteen radiographic-Spondyloarthritis patients were recruited for this study. Two postural reference radiographs, followed by three trials in forward, left and right lateral bending were taken. For all trials, three measurements were collected: tape (Original Schober’s, Modified Schober’s, Modified-Modified Schober’s, Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test), followed immediately by synchronized radiograph and accelerometer measurements at end range of forward and bilateral lateral flexion. The criterion-concurrent validity of all measurement methods was compared to the radiographic measures using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess agreement. RESULTS: In forward bending, the accelerometer method (r = 0.590, p = 0.010) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measures than all tape measures. In lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion tape measure (r = 0.743, p = 0.001) correlated stronger than the accelerometer method (r = 0.556, p = 0.016). The Domjan test of bilateral bending (r = 0.708, p = 0.002) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measure than the accelerometer method. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer measures demonstrated superior criterion-concurrent validity compared to current tape measures of spinal mobility in forward bending. While a moderate correlation exists between accelerometer and radiographs in lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test were found to have the best criterion-concurrent validity of all tests examined in this study. BioMed Central 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8140455/ /pubmed/34020625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04352-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Snow, John Charles
Simpson, Kyle
Rahman, Proton
Howarth, Samuel
De Carvalho, Diana
Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
title Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
title_full Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
title_fullStr Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
title_full_unstemmed Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
title_short Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
title_sort spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04352-z
work_keys_str_mv AT snowjohncharles spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements
AT simpsonkyle spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements
AT rahmanproton spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements
AT howarthsamuel spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements
AT decarvalhodiana spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements