Cargando…
Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements
BACKGROUND: Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04352-z |
_version_ | 1783696191694831616 |
---|---|
author | Snow, John Charles Simpson, Kyle Rahman, Proton Howarth, Samuel De Carvalho, Diana |
author_facet | Snow, John Charles Simpson, Kyle Rahman, Proton Howarth, Samuel De Carvalho, Diana |
author_sort | Snow, John Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method of measuring spine mobility using tri-axial accelerometers. METHODS: Fifteen radiographic-Spondyloarthritis patients were recruited for this study. Two postural reference radiographs, followed by three trials in forward, left and right lateral bending were taken. For all trials, three measurements were collected: tape (Original Schober’s, Modified Schober’s, Modified-Modified Schober’s, Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test), followed immediately by synchronized radiograph and accelerometer measurements at end range of forward and bilateral lateral flexion. The criterion-concurrent validity of all measurement methods was compared to the radiographic measures using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess agreement. RESULTS: In forward bending, the accelerometer method (r = 0.590, p = 0.010) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measures than all tape measures. In lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion tape measure (r = 0.743, p = 0.001) correlated stronger than the accelerometer method (r = 0.556, p = 0.016). The Domjan test of bilateral bending (r = 0.708, p = 0.002) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measure than the accelerometer method. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer measures demonstrated superior criterion-concurrent validity compared to current tape measures of spinal mobility in forward bending. While a moderate correlation exists between accelerometer and radiographs in lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test were found to have the best criterion-concurrent validity of all tests examined in this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8140455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81404552021-05-25 Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements Snow, John Charles Simpson, Kyle Rahman, Proton Howarth, Samuel De Carvalho, Diana BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method of measuring spine mobility using tri-axial accelerometers. METHODS: Fifteen radiographic-Spondyloarthritis patients were recruited for this study. Two postural reference radiographs, followed by three trials in forward, left and right lateral bending were taken. For all trials, three measurements were collected: tape (Original Schober’s, Modified Schober’s, Modified-Modified Schober’s, Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test), followed immediately by synchronized radiograph and accelerometer measurements at end range of forward and bilateral lateral flexion. The criterion-concurrent validity of all measurement methods was compared to the radiographic measures using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess agreement. RESULTS: In forward bending, the accelerometer method (r = 0.590, p = 0.010) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measures than all tape measures. In lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion tape measure (r = 0.743, p = 0.001) correlated stronger than the accelerometer method (r = 0.556, p = 0.016). The Domjan test of bilateral bending (r = 0.708, p = 0.002) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measure than the accelerometer method. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer measures demonstrated superior criterion-concurrent validity compared to current tape measures of spinal mobility in forward bending. While a moderate correlation exists between accelerometer and radiographs in lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test were found to have the best criterion-concurrent validity of all tests examined in this study. BioMed Central 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8140455/ /pubmed/34020625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04352-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Snow, John Charles Simpson, Kyle Rahman, Proton Howarth, Samuel De Carvalho, Diana Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
title | Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
title_full | Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
title_fullStr | Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
title_short | Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
title_sort | spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04352-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT snowjohncharles spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements AT simpsonkyle spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements AT rahmanproton spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements AT howarthsamuel spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements AT decarvalhodiana spinalmobilityinradiographicaxialspondyloarthritiscriterionconcurrentvalidityofclassicandnovelmeasurements |