Cargando…
Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life
BACKGROUND: Optimal supportive end of life care for frail, older adults in long term care (LTC) homes involves symptom management, family participation, advance care plans, and organizational support. This 2-phase study aimed to combine multi-disciplinary opinions, build group consensus, and identif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1 |
_version_ | 1783696214326247424 |
---|---|
author | Harasym, Patricia M. Afzaal, Misha Brisbin, Sarah Sinnarajah, Aynharan Venturato, Lorraine Quail, Patrick Kaasalainen, Sharon Straus, Sharon Sussman, Tamara Virk, Navjot Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna M. |
author_facet | Harasym, Patricia M. Afzaal, Misha Brisbin, Sarah Sinnarajah, Aynharan Venturato, Lorraine Quail, Patrick Kaasalainen, Sharon Straus, Sharon Sussman, Tamara Virk, Navjot Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna M. |
author_sort | Harasym, Patricia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Optimal supportive end of life care for frail, older adults in long term care (LTC) homes involves symptom management, family participation, advance care plans, and organizational support. This 2-phase study aimed to combine multi-disciplinary opinions, build group consensus, and identify the top interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. METHODS: A consensus-building approach was undertaken in 2 Phases. The first phase deployed modified Delphi questionnaires to address and transform diverse opinions into group consensus. The second phase explored and prioritized the interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. Development of the Delphi questionnaire was based on findings from published results of physician perspectives of barriers and facilitators to optimal supportive end of life care in LTC, a literature search of palliative care models in LTC, and published results of patient, family and nursing perspectives of supportive end of life care in long term care. The second phase involved World Café Style workshop discussions. A multi-disciplinary purposive sample of individuals inclusive of physicians; staff, administrators, residents, family members, and content experts in palliative care, and researchers in geriatrics and gerontology participated in round one of the modified Delphi questionnaire. A second purposive sample derived from round one participants completed the second round of the modified Delphi questionnaire. A third purposive sample (including participants from the Delphi panel) then convened to identify the top priorities needed to develop a supportive end-of-life care strategy for LTC. RESULTS: 19 participants rated 75 statements on a 9-point Likert scale during the first round of the modified Delphi questionnaire. 11 participants (participation rate 58 %) completed the second round of the modified Delphi questionnaire and reached consensus on the inclusion of 71candidate statements. 35 multidisciplinary participants discussed the 71 statements remaining and prioritized the top clinical practice, communication, and policy interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life strategy for LTC. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-disciplinary stakeholders identified and prioritized the top interventions needed to develop a 5-point supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8140573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81405732021-05-24 Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life Harasym, Patricia M. Afzaal, Misha Brisbin, Sarah Sinnarajah, Aynharan Venturato, Lorraine Quail, Patrick Kaasalainen, Sharon Straus, Sharon Sussman, Tamara Virk, Navjot Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna M. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Optimal supportive end of life care for frail, older adults in long term care (LTC) homes involves symptom management, family participation, advance care plans, and organizational support. This 2-phase study aimed to combine multi-disciplinary opinions, build group consensus, and identify the top interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. METHODS: A consensus-building approach was undertaken in 2 Phases. The first phase deployed modified Delphi questionnaires to address and transform diverse opinions into group consensus. The second phase explored and prioritized the interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. Development of the Delphi questionnaire was based on findings from published results of physician perspectives of barriers and facilitators to optimal supportive end of life care in LTC, a literature search of palliative care models in LTC, and published results of patient, family and nursing perspectives of supportive end of life care in long term care. The second phase involved World Café Style workshop discussions. A multi-disciplinary purposive sample of individuals inclusive of physicians; staff, administrators, residents, family members, and content experts in palliative care, and researchers in geriatrics and gerontology participated in round one of the modified Delphi questionnaire. A second purposive sample derived from round one participants completed the second round of the modified Delphi questionnaire. A third purposive sample (including participants from the Delphi panel) then convened to identify the top priorities needed to develop a supportive end-of-life care strategy for LTC. RESULTS: 19 participants rated 75 statements on a 9-point Likert scale during the first round of the modified Delphi questionnaire. 11 participants (participation rate 58 %) completed the second round of the modified Delphi questionnaire and reached consensus on the inclusion of 71candidate statements. 35 multidisciplinary participants discussed the 71 statements remaining and prioritized the top clinical practice, communication, and policy interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life strategy for LTC. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-disciplinary stakeholders identified and prioritized the top interventions needed to develop a 5-point supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1. BioMed Central 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8140573/ /pubmed/34022818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Harasym, Patricia M. Afzaal, Misha Brisbin, Sarah Sinnarajah, Aynharan Venturato, Lorraine Quail, Patrick Kaasalainen, Sharon Straus, Sharon Sussman, Tamara Virk, Navjot Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna M. Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
title | Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
title_full | Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
title_fullStr | Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
title_short | Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
title_sort | multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harasympatriciam multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT afzaalmisha multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT brisbinsarah multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT sinnarajahaynharan multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT venturatolorraine multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT quailpatrick multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT kaasalainensharon multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT straussharon multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT sussmantamara multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT virknavjot multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife AT holroydleducjaynam multidisciplinarysupportiveendoflifecareinlongtermcareanintegrativeapproachtoimprovingendoflife |