Cargando…

COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA

Comparing the anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy, silicone oil endotamponade without cyclopexy (VEWOC) and with cyclopexy (VEWC) in patients with traumatic cyclodialysis clefts and severe ocular comorbidities. METHODS: A total of 55 patients (55 eyes) with traumatic cyclodialysis cleft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Anan, Zhao, Zhenquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Retina 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002996
_version_ 1783696223655428096
author Wang, Anan
Zhao, Zhenquan
author_facet Wang, Anan
Zhao, Zhenquan
author_sort Wang, Anan
collection PubMed
description Comparing the anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy, silicone oil endotamponade without cyclopexy (VEWOC) and with cyclopexy (VEWC) in patients with traumatic cyclodialysis clefts and severe ocular comorbidities. METHODS: A total of 55 patients (55 eyes) with traumatic cyclodialysis clefts were divided into VEWOC and VEWC groups according to the surgery undergone. Besides the cyclodialysis clefts, all study eyes had one or more additional conditions caused by severe ocular trauma: cataract, lens dislocation, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, choroidal detachment, maculopathy, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, subretinal hemorrhage, or proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The minimum postoperative follow-up period for all patients was six months. The main measures of outcome were rate of successful anatomical repair, intraocular pressure, and best-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: Both the VEWOC group (33 eyes) and the VEWC group (22 eyes) showed significant improvement in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure at the final follow-up. The groups had no significant differences in terms of anatomical success rates (VEWOC 29/33 vs. VEWC 20/22, P = 1.000), final best-corrected visual acuity (VEWOC 1.60 ± 0.76 [median Snellen acuity: counting fingers, range: light perception to 20/20] vs. VEWC 1.46 ± 0.66 [median Snellen acuity: 20/800, range: light perception to 20/32], P = 0.485), and final intraocular pressure (VEWOC 13.40 [8.20–17.80] vs. VEWC 11.40 [6.65–14.00] mmHg, P = 0.311). However, the intraocular pressure on postoperative Day 1 was significantly different between the groups (VEWOC 10.40 [6.40–14.60] vs. VEWC 6.40 [4.70–7.98] mmHg, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study showed that both surgical approaches were equally effective in treating cyclodialysis clefts secondary to severe ocular trauma. Therefore, it may be unnecessary to perform cyclopexy in addition to the vitrectomy procedure in such cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8140664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Retina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81406642021-06-01 COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA Wang, Anan Zhao, Zhenquan Retina Original Study Comparing the anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy, silicone oil endotamponade without cyclopexy (VEWOC) and with cyclopexy (VEWC) in patients with traumatic cyclodialysis clefts and severe ocular comorbidities. METHODS: A total of 55 patients (55 eyes) with traumatic cyclodialysis clefts were divided into VEWOC and VEWC groups according to the surgery undergone. Besides the cyclodialysis clefts, all study eyes had one or more additional conditions caused by severe ocular trauma: cataract, lens dislocation, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, choroidal detachment, maculopathy, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, subretinal hemorrhage, or proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The minimum postoperative follow-up period for all patients was six months. The main measures of outcome were rate of successful anatomical repair, intraocular pressure, and best-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: Both the VEWOC group (33 eyes) and the VEWC group (22 eyes) showed significant improvement in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure at the final follow-up. The groups had no significant differences in terms of anatomical success rates (VEWOC 29/33 vs. VEWC 20/22, P = 1.000), final best-corrected visual acuity (VEWOC 1.60 ± 0.76 [median Snellen acuity: counting fingers, range: light perception to 20/20] vs. VEWC 1.46 ± 0.66 [median Snellen acuity: 20/800, range: light perception to 20/32], P = 0.485), and final intraocular pressure (VEWOC 13.40 [8.20–17.80] vs. VEWC 11.40 [6.65–14.00] mmHg, P = 0.311). However, the intraocular pressure on postoperative Day 1 was significantly different between the groups (VEWOC 10.40 [6.40–14.60] vs. VEWC 6.40 [4.70–7.98] mmHg, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study showed that both surgical approaches were equally effective in treating cyclodialysis clefts secondary to severe ocular trauma. Therefore, it may be unnecessary to perform cyclopexy in addition to the vitrectomy procedure in such cases. Retina 2021-06 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8140664/ /pubmed/33079790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002996 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Opthalmic Communications Society, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Study
Wang, Anan
Zhao, Zhenquan
COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA
title COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA
title_full COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA
title_fullStr COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA
title_full_unstemmed COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA
title_short COMPARING VITRECTOMY, SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE WITH/WITHOUT CYCLOPEXY TO TREAT CYCLODIALYSIS CLEFTS WITH SEVERE OCULAR TRAUMA
title_sort comparing vitrectomy, silicone oil endotamponade with/without cyclopexy to treat cyclodialysis clefts with severe ocular trauma
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002996
work_keys_str_mv AT wanganan comparingvitrectomysiliconeoilendotamponadewithwithoutcyclopexytotreatcyclodialysiscleftswithsevereoculartrauma
AT zhaozhenquan comparingvitrectomysiliconeoilendotamponadewithwithoutcyclopexytotreatcyclodialysiscleftswithsevereoculartrauma