Cargando…

Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model

Surgical correction of craniosynostosis addresses potentially elevated intracranial pressure and the cranial deformity. In nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis, approximately 15% of patients have elevated intracranial pressure. The decision to operate therefore likely reflects a combination of aesthetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Christopher D., Langa, Olivia, Nuzzi, Laura, Staffa, Steven J., Proctor, Mark, Meara, John G., Ganske, Ingrid M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003493
_version_ 1783696239744778240
author Hughes, Christopher D.
Langa, Olivia
Nuzzi, Laura
Staffa, Steven J.
Proctor, Mark
Meara, John G.
Ganske, Ingrid M.
author_facet Hughes, Christopher D.
Langa, Olivia
Nuzzi, Laura
Staffa, Steven J.
Proctor, Mark
Meara, John G.
Ganske, Ingrid M.
author_sort Hughes, Christopher D.
collection PubMed
description Surgical correction of craniosynostosis addresses potentially elevated intracranial pressure and the cranial deformity. In nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis, approximately 15% of patients have elevated intracranial pressure. The decision to operate therefore likely reflects a combination of aesthetic goals, prevention of brain growth restriction over time, surgeon training and experience, and parental expectations. This study examines clinical factors that influence surgical decision-making in nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. METHODS: An online survey sent to craniofacial and neurosurgeons presented 5 theoretical patients with varying severities of sagittal synostosis. For each cephalic index, 4 separate clinical scenarios were presented to assess influences of parental concern and developmental delay on the decision to operate. RESULTS: Fifty-six surveys were completed (response rate = 28%). Participants were predominantly from North America (57%), had over 10 years of experience (75%), and performed over 20 craniosynostosis procedures annually (50%). Thirty percent of respondents indicated they would operate regardless of head shape and without clinical and/or parental concern. Head shape was the greatest predictor of decision to operate (P < 0.001). Parental concern and developmental delay were independently associated with decision to operate (P < 0.001). Surgeons with more experience were also more likely to operate across all phenotypes (OR: 2.69, P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons responding to this survey were more strongly compelled to operate on children with nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis when head shape was more severe. Additional factors, including parental concern and developmental delay, also influence the decision to operate, especially for moderate phenotypes. Geographic and subspecialty variations were not significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8140767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81407672021-05-24 Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model Hughes, Christopher D. Langa, Olivia Nuzzi, Laura Staffa, Steven J. Proctor, Mark Meara, John G. Ganske, Ingrid M. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Craniofacial/Pediatric Surgical correction of craniosynostosis addresses potentially elevated intracranial pressure and the cranial deformity. In nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis, approximately 15% of patients have elevated intracranial pressure. The decision to operate therefore likely reflects a combination of aesthetic goals, prevention of brain growth restriction over time, surgeon training and experience, and parental expectations. This study examines clinical factors that influence surgical decision-making in nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. METHODS: An online survey sent to craniofacial and neurosurgeons presented 5 theoretical patients with varying severities of sagittal synostosis. For each cephalic index, 4 separate clinical scenarios were presented to assess influences of parental concern and developmental delay on the decision to operate. RESULTS: Fifty-six surveys were completed (response rate = 28%). Participants were predominantly from North America (57%), had over 10 years of experience (75%), and performed over 20 craniosynostosis procedures annually (50%). Thirty percent of respondents indicated they would operate regardless of head shape and without clinical and/or parental concern. Head shape was the greatest predictor of decision to operate (P < 0.001). Parental concern and developmental delay were independently associated with decision to operate (P < 0.001). Surgeons with more experience were also more likely to operate across all phenotypes (OR: 2.69, P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons responding to this survey were more strongly compelled to operate on children with nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis when head shape was more severe. Additional factors, including parental concern and developmental delay, also influence the decision to operate, especially for moderate phenotypes. Geographic and subspecialty variations were not significant. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8140767/ /pubmed/34036018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003493 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Craniofacial/Pediatric
Hughes, Christopher D.
Langa, Olivia
Nuzzi, Laura
Staffa, Steven J.
Proctor, Mark
Meara, John G.
Ganske, Ingrid M.
Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model
title Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model
title_full Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model
title_fullStr Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model
title_short Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model
title_sort evaluating surgical decision-making in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis using a digital 3d model
topic Craniofacial/Pediatric
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003493
work_keys_str_mv AT hugheschristopherd evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel
AT langaolivia evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel
AT nuzzilaura evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel
AT staffastevenj evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel
AT proctormark evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel
AT mearajohng evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel
AT ganskeingridm evaluatingsurgicaldecisionmakinginnonsyndromicsagittalcraniosynostosisusingadigital3dmodel