Cargando…
Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma
PURPOSE: Current guidelines for postoperative management of patients with stage I-IIA cutaneous melanoma (CM) do not recommend routine cross-sectional imaging, yet many of these patients develop metastases. Methods that complement American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging are needed to impro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00119 |
_version_ | 1783696249071861760 |
---|---|
author | Hsueh, Eddy C. DeBloom, James R. Lee, Jonathan H. Sussman, Jeffrey J. Covington, Kyle R. Caruso, Hillary G. Quick, Ann P. Cook, Robert W. Slingluff, Craig L. McMasters, Kelly M. |
author_facet | Hsueh, Eddy C. DeBloom, James R. Lee, Jonathan H. Sussman, Jeffrey J. Covington, Kyle R. Caruso, Hillary G. Quick, Ann P. Cook, Robert W. Slingluff, Craig L. McMasters, Kelly M. |
author_sort | Hsueh, Eddy C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Current guidelines for postoperative management of patients with stage I-IIA cutaneous melanoma (CM) do not recommend routine cross-sectional imaging, yet many of these patients develop metastases. Methods that complement American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging are needed to improve identification and treatment of these patients. A 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test predicts metastatic risk as low (class 1) or high (class 2). Prospective analysis of CM outcomes was performed to test the hypotheses that the 31-GEP provides prognostic value for patients with stage I-III CM, and that patients with stage I-IIA melanoma and class 2 31-GEP results have metastatic risk similar to patients for whom surveillance is recommended. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two multicenter registry studies, INTEGRATE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02355574) and EXPAND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02355587), were initiated under institutional review board approval, and 323 patients with stage I-III CM and median follow-up time of 3.2 years met inclusion criteria. Primary end points were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 31-GEP was significant for RFS, DMFS, and OS in a univariate analysis and was a significant, independent predictor of RFS, DMFS, and OS in a multivariable analysis. GEP class 2 results were significantly associated with lower 3-year RFS, DMFS, and OS in all patients and those with stage I-IIA disease. Patients with stage I-IIA CM and a class 2 result had recurrence, distant metastasis, and death rates similar to patients with stage IIB-III CM. Combining 31-GEP results and AJCC staging enhanced sensitivity over each approach alone. CONCLUSION: These data provide a rationale for using the 31-GEP along with AJCC staging, and suggest that patients with stage I-IIA CM and a class 2 31-GEP signature may be candidates for more intense follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8140806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81408062021-05-24 Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma Hsueh, Eddy C. DeBloom, James R. Lee, Jonathan H. Sussman, Jeffrey J. Covington, Kyle R. Caruso, Hillary G. Quick, Ann P. Cook, Robert W. Slingluff, Craig L. McMasters, Kelly M. JCO Precis Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Current guidelines for postoperative management of patients with stage I-IIA cutaneous melanoma (CM) do not recommend routine cross-sectional imaging, yet many of these patients develop metastases. Methods that complement American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging are needed to improve identification and treatment of these patients. A 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test predicts metastatic risk as low (class 1) or high (class 2). Prospective analysis of CM outcomes was performed to test the hypotheses that the 31-GEP provides prognostic value for patients with stage I-III CM, and that patients with stage I-IIA melanoma and class 2 31-GEP results have metastatic risk similar to patients for whom surveillance is recommended. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two multicenter registry studies, INTEGRATE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02355574) and EXPAND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02355587), were initiated under institutional review board approval, and 323 patients with stage I-III CM and median follow-up time of 3.2 years met inclusion criteria. Primary end points were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 31-GEP was significant for RFS, DMFS, and OS in a univariate analysis and was a significant, independent predictor of RFS, DMFS, and OS in a multivariable analysis. GEP class 2 results were significantly associated with lower 3-year RFS, DMFS, and OS in all patients and those with stage I-IIA disease. Patients with stage I-IIA CM and a class 2 result had recurrence, distant metastasis, and death rates similar to patients with stage IIB-III CM. Combining 31-GEP results and AJCC staging enhanced sensitivity over each approach alone. CONCLUSION: These data provide a rationale for using the 31-GEP along with AJCC staging, and suggest that patients with stage I-IIA CM and a class 2 31-GEP signature may be candidates for more intense follow-up. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8140806/ /pubmed/34036233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00119 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Hsueh, Eddy C. DeBloom, James R. Lee, Jonathan H. Sussman, Jeffrey J. Covington, Kyle R. Caruso, Hillary G. Quick, Ann P. Cook, Robert W. Slingluff, Craig L. McMasters, Kelly M. Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma |
title | Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma |
title_full | Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma |
title_fullStr | Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma |
title_short | Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma |
title_sort | long-term outcomes in a multicenter, prospective cohort evaluating the prognostic 31-gene expression profile for cutaneous melanoma |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsueheddyc longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT debloomjamesr longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT leejonathanh longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT sussmanjeffreyj longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT covingtonkyler longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT carusohillaryg longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT quickannp longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT cookrobertw longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT slingluffcraigl longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma AT mcmasterskellym longtermoutcomesinamulticenterprospectivecohortevaluatingtheprognostic31geneexpressionprofileforcutaneousmelanoma |