Cargando…
The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists
Survey alert letters improve response rates and assure potential respondents that the research is legitimate and of high quality. Pre-notification by mail increases response rates for web surveys because it represents a second mode of communication and contributes to increases in respondent trust an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04029-3 |
_version_ | 1783696296594374656 |
---|---|
author | Frandell, Ashlee Feeney, Mary K. Johnson, Timothy P. Welch, Eric W. Michalegko, Lesley Jung, Heyjie |
author_facet | Frandell, Ashlee Feeney, Mary K. Johnson, Timothy P. Welch, Eric W. Michalegko, Lesley Jung, Heyjie |
author_sort | Frandell, Ashlee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Survey alert letters improve response rates and assure potential respondents that the research is legitimate and of high quality. Pre-notification by mail increases response rates for web surveys because it represents a second mode of communication and contributes to increases in respondent trust and study legitimacy. Due to work-from-home orders in response to COVID-19, postal alert letters are unlikely to reach research participants at their place of employment. We conducted three experiments testing the effects of sending academic scientists a pre-notification email message on web survey response rates as compared to no alert email message and variation in the timing of the pre-notification. The data comes from three random national samples of university-based scientists that were conducted during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Two of three experiments suggest that email alert pre-notifications can have a minor effect on improving response rates to web surveys of academic scientists. The timing of those pre-notification messages, though, had no effect on survey response. These findings indicate pre-notification messages remain useful when studying academic scientists. Future research should compare the effects of electronic as compared to postal pre-notification on survey response among scientists, as postal pre-notification requires extensive resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8141099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81410992021-05-24 The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists Frandell, Ashlee Feeney, Mary K. Johnson, Timothy P. Welch, Eric W. Michalegko, Lesley Jung, Heyjie Scientometrics Article Survey alert letters improve response rates and assure potential respondents that the research is legitimate and of high quality. Pre-notification by mail increases response rates for web surveys because it represents a second mode of communication and contributes to increases in respondent trust and study legitimacy. Due to work-from-home orders in response to COVID-19, postal alert letters are unlikely to reach research participants at their place of employment. We conducted three experiments testing the effects of sending academic scientists a pre-notification email message on web survey response rates as compared to no alert email message and variation in the timing of the pre-notification. The data comes from three random national samples of university-based scientists that were conducted during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Two of three experiments suggest that email alert pre-notifications can have a minor effect on improving response rates to web surveys of academic scientists. The timing of those pre-notification messages, though, had no effect on survey response. These findings indicate pre-notification messages remain useful when studying academic scientists. Future research should compare the effects of electronic as compared to postal pre-notification on survey response among scientists, as postal pre-notification requires extensive resources. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8141099/ /pubmed/34054159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04029-3 Text en © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Frandell, Ashlee Feeney, Mary K. Johnson, Timothy P. Welch, Eric W. Michalegko, Lesley Jung, Heyjie The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
title | The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
title_full | The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
title_fullStr | The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
title_short | The effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
title_sort | effects of electronic alert letters for internet surveys of academic scientists |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04029-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frandellashlee theeffectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT feeneymaryk theeffectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT johnsontimothyp theeffectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT welchericw theeffectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT michalegkolesley theeffectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT jungheyjie theeffectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT frandellashlee effectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT feeneymaryk effectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT johnsontimothyp effectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT welchericw effectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT michalegkolesley effectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists AT jungheyjie effectsofelectronicalertlettersforinternetsurveysofacademicscientists |