Cargando…
The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore
BACKGROUND: Computerisation of various processes in hospitals and reliance on electronic devices raises the concern of contamination of these devices from the patient environment. We undertook this study to determine if an attached hand hygiene device that unlocks the screen of a computer on wheels...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00948-1 |
_version_ | 1783696305766268928 |
---|---|
author | Pada, Surinder Kaur M. S. Lishi, Poh Ng, Kim Sim Rethenam, Sarathamani Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Chee, Poh Ling Guo, Wilma Hsann, Yin Maw Cheng, Carmen Wan Rong Ong, Chiou Horng Lasantha, Ratnayake Chan, Douglas Tambyah, Paul Anantharajah |
author_facet | Pada, Surinder Kaur M. S. Lishi, Poh Ng, Kim Sim Rethenam, Sarathamani Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Chee, Poh Ling Guo, Wilma Hsann, Yin Maw Cheng, Carmen Wan Rong Ong, Chiou Horng Lasantha, Ratnayake Chan, Douglas Tambyah, Paul Anantharajah |
author_sort | Pada, Surinder Kaur M. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerisation of various processes in hospitals and reliance on electronic devices raises the concern of contamination of these devices from the patient environment. We undertook this study to determine if an attached hand hygiene device that unlocks the screen of a computer on wheels (COW) on usage can be effective in decreasing the microbiological burden on computer keyboards. METHODS: An electronic hand sanitizer was integrated onto the COW. A prospective cohort study with a crossover design involving 2 control and 2 intervention wards was used. The study end point was the number of colony forming units found on the keyboards. Bacteria were classified into 4 main groups; pathogenic, skin flora, from the environment or those thought to be commensals in healthy individuals. We then used a mixed effects model for the statistical analysis to determine if there were any differences before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-nine keyboards were swabbed at baseline, day 7 and 14, with 234 keyboards cultured, colony forming units (CFUs) counted and organisms isolated. By mixed model analysis, the difference of mean bacteria count between intervention and control for week 1 was 32.74 (− 32.74, CI − 94.29 to 28.75, p = 0.29), for week 2 by 155.86 (− 155.86, CI − 227.45 to − 83.53, p < 0.0001), and after the 2-week period by 157.04 (− 157.04, CI − 231.53 to − 82.67, p < 0.0001). In the sub-analysis, there were significant differences of pathogenic bacteria counts for the Intervention as compared to the Control in contrast with commensal counts. CONCLUSION: A hand hygiene device attached to a COW may be effective in decreasing the microbiological burden on computer keyboards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00948-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8141142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81411422021-05-25 The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore Pada, Surinder Kaur M. S. Lishi, Poh Ng, Kim Sim Rethenam, Sarathamani Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Chee, Poh Ling Guo, Wilma Hsann, Yin Maw Cheng, Carmen Wan Rong Ong, Chiou Horng Lasantha, Ratnayake Chan, Douglas Tambyah, Paul Anantharajah Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Computerisation of various processes in hospitals and reliance on electronic devices raises the concern of contamination of these devices from the patient environment. We undertook this study to determine if an attached hand hygiene device that unlocks the screen of a computer on wheels (COW) on usage can be effective in decreasing the microbiological burden on computer keyboards. METHODS: An electronic hand sanitizer was integrated onto the COW. A prospective cohort study with a crossover design involving 2 control and 2 intervention wards was used. The study end point was the number of colony forming units found on the keyboards. Bacteria were classified into 4 main groups; pathogenic, skin flora, from the environment or those thought to be commensals in healthy individuals. We then used a mixed effects model for the statistical analysis to determine if there were any differences before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-nine keyboards were swabbed at baseline, day 7 and 14, with 234 keyboards cultured, colony forming units (CFUs) counted and organisms isolated. By mixed model analysis, the difference of mean bacteria count between intervention and control for week 1 was 32.74 (− 32.74, CI − 94.29 to 28.75, p = 0.29), for week 2 by 155.86 (− 155.86, CI − 227.45 to − 83.53, p < 0.0001), and after the 2-week period by 157.04 (− 157.04, CI − 231.53 to − 82.67, p < 0.0001). In the sub-analysis, there were significant differences of pathogenic bacteria counts for the Intervention as compared to the Control in contrast with commensal counts. CONCLUSION: A hand hygiene device attached to a COW may be effective in decreasing the microbiological burden on computer keyboards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00948-1. BioMed Central 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8141142/ /pubmed/34022947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00948-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pada, Surinder Kaur M. S. Lishi, Poh Ng, Kim Sim Rethenam, Sarathamani Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Chee, Poh Ling Guo, Wilma Hsann, Yin Maw Cheng, Carmen Wan Rong Ong, Chiou Horng Lasantha, Ratnayake Chan, Douglas Tambyah, Paul Anantharajah The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore |
title | The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore |
title_full | The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore |
title_fullStr | The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore |
title_short | The impact of a ‘milking the COW’ campaign in a regional hospital in Singapore |
title_sort | impact of a ‘milking the cow’ campaign in a regional hospital in singapore |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00948-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT padasurinderkaurms theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT lishipoh theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT ngkimsim theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT rethenamsarathamani theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT alentonlilibethsilagan theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT cheepohling theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT guowilma theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT hsannyinmaw theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT chengcarmenwanrong theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT ongchiouhorng theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT lasantharatnayake theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT chandouglas theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT tambyahpaulanantharajah theimpactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT padasurinderkaurms impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT lishipoh impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT ngkimsim impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT rethenamsarathamani impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT alentonlilibethsilagan impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT cheepohling impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT guowilma impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT hsannyinmaw impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT chengcarmenwanrong impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT ongchiouhorng impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT lasantharatnayake impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT chandouglas impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore AT tambyahpaulanantharajah impactofamilkingthecowcampaigninaregionalhospitalinsingapore |