Cargando…

The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common approach for the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, there is no clear mechanistic evidence or consensus on what type of exercise is more effective than others. While considerable evidence suggests a link between lumbar musc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fortin, Maryse, Rye, Meaghan, Roussac, Alexa, Naghdi, Neda, Macedo, Luciana Gazzi, Dover, Geoffrey, Elliott, James M., DeMont, Richard, Weber, Michael H., Pepin, Véronique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x
_version_ 1783696325039095808
author Fortin, Maryse
Rye, Meaghan
Roussac, Alexa
Naghdi, Neda
Macedo, Luciana Gazzi
Dover, Geoffrey
Elliott, James M.
DeMont, Richard
Weber, Michael H.
Pepin, Véronique
author_facet Fortin, Maryse
Rye, Meaghan
Roussac, Alexa
Naghdi, Neda
Macedo, Luciana Gazzi
Dover, Geoffrey
Elliott, James M.
DeMont, Richard
Weber, Michael H.
Pepin, Véronique
author_sort Fortin, Maryse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common approach for the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, there is no clear mechanistic evidence or consensus on what type of exercise is more effective than others. While considerable evidence suggests a link between lumbar muscle health (e.g., atrophy and fatty infiltration) with functional deficits, it is unknown whether exercises targeting the lumbar spine can lead to noticeable improvements in muscle health and functional outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effect of combined motor control and isolated strengthening lumbar exercises (MC + ILEX) versus a general exercise group (GE) on multifidus muscle morphology (size and composition). Secondary aims include assessing the effect of the interventions on overall paraspinal muscle health, pain and disability, as well as psychological factors as possible effect modifiers. METHODS: A total of 50 participants with chronic non-specific LBP and moderate to severe disability, aged between 18 and 60, will be recruited from the local orthopaedic clinics and university community. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either the MC + ILEX or GE group. Participants will undergo 24 individually supervised exercise sessions over a 12-week period. The primary outcome will be multifidus morphology (atrophy) and composition (fatty infiltration). Secondary outcomes will be muscle function (e.g., % thickness change during contraction), morphology, lumbar extension strength, pain intensity and disability. Potential treatment effect modifiers including maladaptive cognitions (fear of movement, catastrophizing), anxiety, depression, physical activity, and sleep quality will also be assessed. All measurements will be obtained at baseline, 6-week and 12-week; self-reported outcomes will also be collected at 24-week. Between-subjects repeated measure analysis of variance will be used to examine the changes in paraspinal muscle morphology over the different time points. Linear mixed models will be used to assess whether baseline scores can modify the response to the exercise therapy treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clarify which of these two common interventions promote better results in terms of overall paraspinal muscle heath, back pain, disability and psychological factors in adults with chronic LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTCT04257253, registered prospectively on February 5, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8141240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81412402021-05-25 The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol Fortin, Maryse Rye, Meaghan Roussac, Alexa Naghdi, Neda Macedo, Luciana Gazzi Dover, Geoffrey Elliott, James M. DeMont, Richard Weber, Michael H. Pepin, Véronique BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common approach for the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, there is no clear mechanistic evidence or consensus on what type of exercise is more effective than others. While considerable evidence suggests a link between lumbar muscle health (e.g., atrophy and fatty infiltration) with functional deficits, it is unknown whether exercises targeting the lumbar spine can lead to noticeable improvements in muscle health and functional outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effect of combined motor control and isolated strengthening lumbar exercises (MC + ILEX) versus a general exercise group (GE) on multifidus muscle morphology (size and composition). Secondary aims include assessing the effect of the interventions on overall paraspinal muscle health, pain and disability, as well as psychological factors as possible effect modifiers. METHODS: A total of 50 participants with chronic non-specific LBP and moderate to severe disability, aged between 18 and 60, will be recruited from the local orthopaedic clinics and university community. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either the MC + ILEX or GE group. Participants will undergo 24 individually supervised exercise sessions over a 12-week period. The primary outcome will be multifidus morphology (atrophy) and composition (fatty infiltration). Secondary outcomes will be muscle function (e.g., % thickness change during contraction), morphology, lumbar extension strength, pain intensity and disability. Potential treatment effect modifiers including maladaptive cognitions (fear of movement, catastrophizing), anxiety, depression, physical activity, and sleep quality will also be assessed. All measurements will be obtained at baseline, 6-week and 12-week; self-reported outcomes will also be collected at 24-week. Between-subjects repeated measure analysis of variance will be used to examine the changes in paraspinal muscle morphology over the different time points. Linear mixed models will be used to assess whether baseline scores can modify the response to the exercise therapy treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clarify which of these two common interventions promote better results in terms of overall paraspinal muscle heath, back pain, disability and psychological factors in adults with chronic LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTCT04257253, registered prospectively on February 5, 2020. BioMed Central 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8141240/ /pubmed/34022854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fortin, Maryse
Rye, Meaghan
Roussac, Alexa
Naghdi, Neda
Macedo, Luciana Gazzi
Dover, Geoffrey
Elliott, James M.
DeMont, Richard
Weber, Michael H.
Pepin, Véronique
The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
title The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
title_full The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
title_fullStr The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
title_short The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
title_sort effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fortinmaryse theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT ryemeaghan theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT roussacalexa theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT naghdineda theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT macedolucianagazzi theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT dovergeoffrey theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT elliottjamesm theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT demontrichard theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT webermichaelh theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT pepinveronique theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT fortinmaryse effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT ryemeaghan effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT roussacalexa effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT naghdineda effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT macedolucianagazzi effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT dovergeoffrey effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT elliottjamesm effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT demontrichard effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT webermichaelh effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT pepinveronique effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol