Cargando…
The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol
BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common approach for the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, there is no clear mechanistic evidence or consensus on what type of exercise is more effective than others. While considerable evidence suggests a link between lumbar musc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x |
_version_ | 1783696325039095808 |
---|---|
author | Fortin, Maryse Rye, Meaghan Roussac, Alexa Naghdi, Neda Macedo, Luciana Gazzi Dover, Geoffrey Elliott, James M. DeMont, Richard Weber, Michael H. Pepin, Véronique |
author_facet | Fortin, Maryse Rye, Meaghan Roussac, Alexa Naghdi, Neda Macedo, Luciana Gazzi Dover, Geoffrey Elliott, James M. DeMont, Richard Weber, Michael H. Pepin, Véronique |
author_sort | Fortin, Maryse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common approach for the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, there is no clear mechanistic evidence or consensus on what type of exercise is more effective than others. While considerable evidence suggests a link between lumbar muscle health (e.g., atrophy and fatty infiltration) with functional deficits, it is unknown whether exercises targeting the lumbar spine can lead to noticeable improvements in muscle health and functional outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effect of combined motor control and isolated strengthening lumbar exercises (MC + ILEX) versus a general exercise group (GE) on multifidus muscle morphology (size and composition). Secondary aims include assessing the effect of the interventions on overall paraspinal muscle health, pain and disability, as well as psychological factors as possible effect modifiers. METHODS: A total of 50 participants with chronic non-specific LBP and moderate to severe disability, aged between 18 and 60, will be recruited from the local orthopaedic clinics and university community. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either the MC + ILEX or GE group. Participants will undergo 24 individually supervised exercise sessions over a 12-week period. The primary outcome will be multifidus morphology (atrophy) and composition (fatty infiltration). Secondary outcomes will be muscle function (e.g., % thickness change during contraction), morphology, lumbar extension strength, pain intensity and disability. Potential treatment effect modifiers including maladaptive cognitions (fear of movement, catastrophizing), anxiety, depression, physical activity, and sleep quality will also be assessed. All measurements will be obtained at baseline, 6-week and 12-week; self-reported outcomes will also be collected at 24-week. Between-subjects repeated measure analysis of variance will be used to examine the changes in paraspinal muscle morphology over the different time points. Linear mixed models will be used to assess whether baseline scores can modify the response to the exercise therapy treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clarify which of these two common interventions promote better results in terms of overall paraspinal muscle heath, back pain, disability and psychological factors in adults with chronic LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTCT04257253, registered prospectively on February 5, 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8141240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81412402021-05-25 The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol Fortin, Maryse Rye, Meaghan Roussac, Alexa Naghdi, Neda Macedo, Luciana Gazzi Dover, Geoffrey Elliott, James M. DeMont, Richard Weber, Michael H. Pepin, Véronique BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common approach for the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, there is no clear mechanistic evidence or consensus on what type of exercise is more effective than others. While considerable evidence suggests a link between lumbar muscle health (e.g., atrophy and fatty infiltration) with functional deficits, it is unknown whether exercises targeting the lumbar spine can lead to noticeable improvements in muscle health and functional outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effect of combined motor control and isolated strengthening lumbar exercises (MC + ILEX) versus a general exercise group (GE) on multifidus muscle morphology (size and composition). Secondary aims include assessing the effect of the interventions on overall paraspinal muscle health, pain and disability, as well as psychological factors as possible effect modifiers. METHODS: A total of 50 participants with chronic non-specific LBP and moderate to severe disability, aged between 18 and 60, will be recruited from the local orthopaedic clinics and university community. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either the MC + ILEX or GE group. Participants will undergo 24 individually supervised exercise sessions over a 12-week period. The primary outcome will be multifidus morphology (atrophy) and composition (fatty infiltration). Secondary outcomes will be muscle function (e.g., % thickness change during contraction), morphology, lumbar extension strength, pain intensity and disability. Potential treatment effect modifiers including maladaptive cognitions (fear of movement, catastrophizing), anxiety, depression, physical activity, and sleep quality will also be assessed. All measurements will be obtained at baseline, 6-week and 12-week; self-reported outcomes will also be collected at 24-week. Between-subjects repeated measure analysis of variance will be used to examine the changes in paraspinal muscle morphology over the different time points. Linear mixed models will be used to assess whether baseline scores can modify the response to the exercise therapy treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clarify which of these two common interventions promote better results in terms of overall paraspinal muscle heath, back pain, disability and psychological factors in adults with chronic LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTCT04257253, registered prospectively on February 5, 2020. BioMed Central 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8141240/ /pubmed/34022854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Fortin, Maryse Rye, Meaghan Roussac, Alexa Naghdi, Neda Macedo, Luciana Gazzi Dover, Geoffrey Elliott, James M. DeMont, Richard Weber, Michael H. Pepin, Véronique The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
title | The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_full | The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_fullStr | The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_short | The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_sort | effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fortinmaryse theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT ryemeaghan theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT roussacalexa theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT naghdineda theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT macedolucianagazzi theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT dovergeoffrey theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT elliottjamesm theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT demontrichard theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT webermichaelh theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT pepinveronique theeffectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT fortinmaryse effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT ryemeaghan effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT roussacalexa effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT naghdineda effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT macedolucianagazzi effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT dovergeoffrey effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT elliottjamesm effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT demontrichard effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT webermichaelh effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT pepinveronique effectsofcombinedmotorcontrolandisolatedextensorstrengtheningversusgeneralexerciseonparaspinalmusclemorphologyandfunctioninpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol |