Cargando…

Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health

Objective The National Institute of Health (NIH) supports the academic career of scientists across the United States (U.S.). It promotes and sponsors scientists in conducting wide-ranging clinical and basic science research. Depending on the duration, research type, and budget, there are various typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safdar, Beenish, Naveed, Sadiq, Chaudhary, Amna Mohyud Din, Saboor, Sundas, Zeshan, Muhammad, Khosa, Faisal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046277
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14644
_version_ 1783696335439921152
author Safdar, Beenish
Naveed, Sadiq
Chaudhary, Amna Mohyud Din
Saboor, Sundas
Zeshan, Muhammad
Khosa, Faisal
author_facet Safdar, Beenish
Naveed, Sadiq
Chaudhary, Amna Mohyud Din
Saboor, Sundas
Zeshan, Muhammad
Khosa, Faisal
author_sort Safdar, Beenish
collection PubMed
description Objective The National Institute of Health (NIH) supports the academic career of scientists across the United States (U.S.). It promotes and sponsors scientists in conducting wide-ranging clinical and basic science research. Depending on the duration, research type, and budget, there are various types of grants awarded by NIH. Despite considerable advancement in biomedical sciences, female researchers remain underrepresented in obtaining NIH funding. Through this study, we aim to highlight the gender trends in NIH funding and grants. By doing this, we aim to facilitate effective future policymaking to help achieve gender parity in NIH grants and awards. Methods The data were obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT). The extracted data by gender were tabulated showing percentages of females as Research Grant Investigators, Research Career Development Award Recipients and Kirschstein-National Research Service Award (NRSA) Trainees and Fellows, recipients of Research Grants, Research Project Grants (RPGs), and R01 equivalent grants including types 1 or 2, over two decades (1999-2019). Absolute percentage change was also calculated and included in the tables. Results The percentage of females as NIH Research Grant Investigators has increased at centers, research centers as well as for RPGs and Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) programs. For Research Career Development Award Recipients and Kirschstein-NRSA Trainees and Fellows, the proportion of female pre-doctoral institutional trainees, post-doctoral fellows, post-doctoral institutional trainees, mentored research career awardees, and other research career awardees have steadily increased. However, there was a decrease in the percentage of female pre-doctoral fellow awardees. The percentage of females receiving all RPGs, R01-New (type 1) and R01-Renewal (type 2) grants has also decreased.  Conclusion Despite an overall increase in the percentage of female researchers successfully receiving NIH grants and awards, they continue to lag compared to their male counterparts. With the increasing number of female doctoral graduates, it is imperative to address this disparity in NIH funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8141289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81412892021-05-26 Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health Safdar, Beenish Naveed, Sadiq Chaudhary, Amna Mohyud Din Saboor, Sundas Zeshan, Muhammad Khosa, Faisal Cureus Quality Improvement Objective The National Institute of Health (NIH) supports the academic career of scientists across the United States (U.S.). It promotes and sponsors scientists in conducting wide-ranging clinical and basic science research. Depending on the duration, research type, and budget, there are various types of grants awarded by NIH. Despite considerable advancement in biomedical sciences, female researchers remain underrepresented in obtaining NIH funding. Through this study, we aim to highlight the gender trends in NIH funding and grants. By doing this, we aim to facilitate effective future policymaking to help achieve gender parity in NIH grants and awards. Methods The data were obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT). The extracted data by gender were tabulated showing percentages of females as Research Grant Investigators, Research Career Development Award Recipients and Kirschstein-National Research Service Award (NRSA) Trainees and Fellows, recipients of Research Grants, Research Project Grants (RPGs), and R01 equivalent grants including types 1 or 2, over two decades (1999-2019). Absolute percentage change was also calculated and included in the tables. Results The percentage of females as NIH Research Grant Investigators has increased at centers, research centers as well as for RPGs and Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) programs. For Research Career Development Award Recipients and Kirschstein-NRSA Trainees and Fellows, the proportion of female pre-doctoral institutional trainees, post-doctoral fellows, post-doctoral institutional trainees, mentored research career awardees, and other research career awardees have steadily increased. However, there was a decrease in the percentage of female pre-doctoral fellow awardees. The percentage of females receiving all RPGs, R01-New (type 1) and R01-Renewal (type 2) grants has also decreased.  Conclusion Despite an overall increase in the percentage of female researchers successfully receiving NIH grants and awards, they continue to lag compared to their male counterparts. With the increasing number of female doctoral graduates, it is imperative to address this disparity in NIH funding. Cureus 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8141289/ /pubmed/34046277 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14644 Text en Copyright © 2021, Safdar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Safdar, Beenish
Naveed, Sadiq
Chaudhary, Amna Mohyud Din
Saboor, Sundas
Zeshan, Muhammad
Khosa, Faisal
Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health
title Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health
title_full Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health
title_fullStr Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health
title_full_unstemmed Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health
title_short Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health
title_sort gender disparity in grants and awards at the national institute of health
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046277
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14644
work_keys_str_mv AT safdarbeenish genderdisparityingrantsandawardsatthenationalinstituteofhealth
AT naveedsadiq genderdisparityingrantsandawardsatthenationalinstituteofhealth
AT chaudharyamnamohyuddin genderdisparityingrantsandawardsatthenationalinstituteofhealth
AT saboorsundas genderdisparityingrantsandawardsatthenationalinstituteofhealth
AT zeshanmuhammad genderdisparityingrantsandawardsatthenationalinstituteofhealth
AT khosafaisal genderdisparityingrantsandawardsatthenationalinstituteofhealth