Cargando…

Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature

BACKGROUND: Change is an ongoing process in any organizations. Over years, healthcare organizations have been exposed to multiple external stimuli to change (eg, ageing population, increasing incidence of chronic diseases, ongoing Sars-Cov-2 pandemic) that pointed out the need to convert the current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milella, Frida, Minelli, Eliana Alessandra, Strozzi, Fernanda, Croce, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040399
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S301169
_version_ 1783696356486938624
author Milella, Frida
Minelli, Eliana Alessandra
Strozzi, Fernanda
Croce, Davide
author_facet Milella, Frida
Minelli, Eliana Alessandra
Strozzi, Fernanda
Croce, Davide
author_sort Milella, Frida
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Change is an ongoing process in any organizations. Over years, healthcare organizations have been exposed to multiple external stimuli to change (eg, ageing population, increasing incidence of chronic diseases, ongoing Sars-Cov-2 pandemic) that pointed out the need to convert the current healthcare organizational model. Nowadays, the topic is extremely relevant, rendering organizational change an urgency. The work is structured on a double level of analysis. In the beginning, the paper collects the overall literature on the topic of organisational change in order to identify, on the basis of the citation network, the main existing theoretical approaches. Secondly, the analysis attempts to isolate the scientific production related to the healthcare context, by analysing the body of literature outside the identified citation network, divided by clusters of related studies. METHODOLOGY: This review adopted a quantitative-based method that employs jointly systematic literature review and bibliographic network analysis. Specifically, the study applied a citation network analysis (CNA) and a co-occurrence keywords analysis. The CNA allowed detecting the most relevant papers published over time, identifying the research streams in literature. RESULTS: The study showed four main findings. Firstly, consistent with past studies, works reviewed pointed out a convergence on the micro-level perspective for change’s analysis. Secondly, an organic viewpoint whereby individual, organization and change’s outcome contribute to any organizational change’s action has been found in its early stage. Thirdly, works reported change combined with innovation’s concept, although the structure of the relationship has not been outlined. Fourth, interestingly, contributions have been limited within the healthcare context. CONCLUSION: Human dimension is the primary criticality to be managed to impede failure of the re-organizational path. Individuals are not passive recipients of change: individual change acceptance has been found a key input. Few papers discussed healthcare professionals’ behaviour, and those available focused on technology-led changes perspective. In this view, individual acceptance of change within the healthcare context resulted being undeveloped and offers rooms for further analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8141398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81413982021-05-25 Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature Milella, Frida Minelli, Eliana Alessandra Strozzi, Fernanda Croce, Davide Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Review BACKGROUND: Change is an ongoing process in any organizations. Over years, healthcare organizations have been exposed to multiple external stimuli to change (eg, ageing population, increasing incidence of chronic diseases, ongoing Sars-Cov-2 pandemic) that pointed out the need to convert the current healthcare organizational model. Nowadays, the topic is extremely relevant, rendering organizational change an urgency. The work is structured on a double level of analysis. In the beginning, the paper collects the overall literature on the topic of organisational change in order to identify, on the basis of the citation network, the main existing theoretical approaches. Secondly, the analysis attempts to isolate the scientific production related to the healthcare context, by analysing the body of literature outside the identified citation network, divided by clusters of related studies. METHODOLOGY: This review adopted a quantitative-based method that employs jointly systematic literature review and bibliographic network analysis. Specifically, the study applied a citation network analysis (CNA) and a co-occurrence keywords analysis. The CNA allowed detecting the most relevant papers published over time, identifying the research streams in literature. RESULTS: The study showed four main findings. Firstly, consistent with past studies, works reviewed pointed out a convergence on the micro-level perspective for change’s analysis. Secondly, an organic viewpoint whereby individual, organization and change’s outcome contribute to any organizational change’s action has been found in its early stage. Thirdly, works reported change combined with innovation’s concept, although the structure of the relationship has not been outlined. Fourth, interestingly, contributions have been limited within the healthcare context. CONCLUSION: Human dimension is the primary criticality to be managed to impede failure of the re-organizational path. Individuals are not passive recipients of change: individual change acceptance has been found a key input. Few papers discussed healthcare professionals’ behaviour, and those available focused on technology-led changes perspective. In this view, individual acceptance of change within the healthcare context resulted being undeveloped and offers rooms for further analyses. Dove 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8141398/ /pubmed/34040399 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S301169 Text en © 2021 Milella et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Milella, Frida
Minelli, Eliana Alessandra
Strozzi, Fernanda
Croce, Davide
Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
title Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
title_full Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
title_fullStr Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
title_full_unstemmed Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
title_short Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
title_sort change and innovation in healthcare: findings from literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040399
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S301169
work_keys_str_mv AT milellafrida changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature
AT minellielianaalessandra changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature
AT strozzifernanda changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature
AT crocedavide changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature