Cargando…
Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature
BACKGROUND: Change is an ongoing process in any organizations. Over years, healthcare organizations have been exposed to multiple external stimuli to change (eg, ageing population, increasing incidence of chronic diseases, ongoing Sars-Cov-2 pandemic) that pointed out the need to convert the current...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040399 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S301169 |
_version_ | 1783696356486938624 |
---|---|
author | Milella, Frida Minelli, Eliana Alessandra Strozzi, Fernanda Croce, Davide |
author_facet | Milella, Frida Minelli, Eliana Alessandra Strozzi, Fernanda Croce, Davide |
author_sort | Milella, Frida |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Change is an ongoing process in any organizations. Over years, healthcare organizations have been exposed to multiple external stimuli to change (eg, ageing population, increasing incidence of chronic diseases, ongoing Sars-Cov-2 pandemic) that pointed out the need to convert the current healthcare organizational model. Nowadays, the topic is extremely relevant, rendering organizational change an urgency. The work is structured on a double level of analysis. In the beginning, the paper collects the overall literature on the topic of organisational change in order to identify, on the basis of the citation network, the main existing theoretical approaches. Secondly, the analysis attempts to isolate the scientific production related to the healthcare context, by analysing the body of literature outside the identified citation network, divided by clusters of related studies. METHODOLOGY: This review adopted a quantitative-based method that employs jointly systematic literature review and bibliographic network analysis. Specifically, the study applied a citation network analysis (CNA) and a co-occurrence keywords analysis. The CNA allowed detecting the most relevant papers published over time, identifying the research streams in literature. RESULTS: The study showed four main findings. Firstly, consistent with past studies, works reviewed pointed out a convergence on the micro-level perspective for change’s analysis. Secondly, an organic viewpoint whereby individual, organization and change’s outcome contribute to any organizational change’s action has been found in its early stage. Thirdly, works reported change combined with innovation’s concept, although the structure of the relationship has not been outlined. Fourth, interestingly, contributions have been limited within the healthcare context. CONCLUSION: Human dimension is the primary criticality to be managed to impede failure of the re-organizational path. Individuals are not passive recipients of change: individual change acceptance has been found a key input. Few papers discussed healthcare professionals’ behaviour, and those available focused on technology-led changes perspective. In this view, individual acceptance of change within the healthcare context resulted being undeveloped and offers rooms for further analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8141398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81413982021-05-25 Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature Milella, Frida Minelli, Eliana Alessandra Strozzi, Fernanda Croce, Davide Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Review BACKGROUND: Change is an ongoing process in any organizations. Over years, healthcare organizations have been exposed to multiple external stimuli to change (eg, ageing population, increasing incidence of chronic diseases, ongoing Sars-Cov-2 pandemic) that pointed out the need to convert the current healthcare organizational model. Nowadays, the topic is extremely relevant, rendering organizational change an urgency. The work is structured on a double level of analysis. In the beginning, the paper collects the overall literature on the topic of organisational change in order to identify, on the basis of the citation network, the main existing theoretical approaches. Secondly, the analysis attempts to isolate the scientific production related to the healthcare context, by analysing the body of literature outside the identified citation network, divided by clusters of related studies. METHODOLOGY: This review adopted a quantitative-based method that employs jointly systematic literature review and bibliographic network analysis. Specifically, the study applied a citation network analysis (CNA) and a co-occurrence keywords analysis. The CNA allowed detecting the most relevant papers published over time, identifying the research streams in literature. RESULTS: The study showed four main findings. Firstly, consistent with past studies, works reviewed pointed out a convergence on the micro-level perspective for change’s analysis. Secondly, an organic viewpoint whereby individual, organization and change’s outcome contribute to any organizational change’s action has been found in its early stage. Thirdly, works reported change combined with innovation’s concept, although the structure of the relationship has not been outlined. Fourth, interestingly, contributions have been limited within the healthcare context. CONCLUSION: Human dimension is the primary criticality to be managed to impede failure of the re-organizational path. Individuals are not passive recipients of change: individual change acceptance has been found a key input. Few papers discussed healthcare professionals’ behaviour, and those available focused on technology-led changes perspective. In this view, individual acceptance of change within the healthcare context resulted being undeveloped and offers rooms for further analyses. Dove 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8141398/ /pubmed/34040399 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S301169 Text en © 2021 Milella et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Milella, Frida Minelli, Eliana Alessandra Strozzi, Fernanda Croce, Davide Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature |
title | Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature |
title_full | Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature |
title_fullStr | Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature |
title_short | Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature |
title_sort | change and innovation in healthcare: findings from literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040399 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S301169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milellafrida changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature AT minellielianaalessandra changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature AT strozzifernanda changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature AT crocedavide changeandinnovationinhealthcarefindingsfromliterature |