Cargando…

Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step

INTRODUCTION: Predicting upper limb capacity recovery is important to set treatment goals, select therapies and plan discharge. We introduce a prediction model of the patient-specific profile of upper limb capacity recovery up to 6 months poststroke by incorporating all serially assessed clinical in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selles, Ruud W, Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina, Nijland, Rinske H, van der Vliet, Rick, Slaman, Jorrit, van Wegen, Erwin EH, Rizopoulos, Dimitris, Ribbers, Gerard M, Meskers, Carel GM, Kwakkel, Gert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637
_version_ 1783696552247689216
author Selles, Ruud W
Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
Nijland, Rinske H
van der Vliet, Rick
Slaman, Jorrit
van Wegen, Erwin EH
Rizopoulos, Dimitris
Ribbers, Gerard M
Meskers, Carel GM
Kwakkel, Gert
author_facet Selles, Ruud W
Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
Nijland, Rinske H
van der Vliet, Rick
Slaman, Jorrit
van Wegen, Erwin EH
Rizopoulos, Dimitris
Ribbers, Gerard M
Meskers, Carel GM
Kwakkel, Gert
author_sort Selles, Ruud W
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Predicting upper limb capacity recovery is important to set treatment goals, select therapies and plan discharge. We introduce a prediction model of the patient-specific profile of upper limb capacity recovery up to 6 months poststroke by incorporating all serially assessed clinical information from patients. METHODS: Model input was recovery profile of 450 patients with a first-ever ischaemic hemispheric stroke measured using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Subjects received at least three assessment sessions, starting within the first week until 6 months poststroke. We developed mixed-effects models that are able to deal with one or multiple measurements per subject, measured at non-fixed time points. The prediction accuracy of the different models was established by a fivefold cross-validation procedure. RESULTS: A model with only ARAT time course, finger extension and shoulder abduction performed as good as models with more covariates. For the final model, cross-validation prediction errors at 6 months poststroke decreased as the number of measurements per subject increased, from a median error of 8.4 points on the ARAT (Q1–Q3:1.7–28.1) when one measurement early poststroke was used, to 2.3 (Q1–Q3:1–7.2) for seven measurements. An online version of the recovery model was developed that can be linked to data acquisition environments. CONCLUSION: Our innovative dynamic model can predict real-time, patient-specific upper limb capacity recovery profiles up to 6 months poststroke. The model can use all available serially assessed data in a flexible way, creating a prediction at any desired moment poststroke, stand-alone or linked with an electronic health record system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81424412021-06-07 Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step Selles, Ruud W Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina Nijland, Rinske H van der Vliet, Rick Slaman, Jorrit van Wegen, Erwin EH Rizopoulos, Dimitris Ribbers, Gerard M Meskers, Carel GM Kwakkel, Gert J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Cerebrovascular Disease INTRODUCTION: Predicting upper limb capacity recovery is important to set treatment goals, select therapies and plan discharge. We introduce a prediction model of the patient-specific profile of upper limb capacity recovery up to 6 months poststroke by incorporating all serially assessed clinical information from patients. METHODS: Model input was recovery profile of 450 patients with a first-ever ischaemic hemispheric stroke measured using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Subjects received at least three assessment sessions, starting within the first week until 6 months poststroke. We developed mixed-effects models that are able to deal with one or multiple measurements per subject, measured at non-fixed time points. The prediction accuracy of the different models was established by a fivefold cross-validation procedure. RESULTS: A model with only ARAT time course, finger extension and shoulder abduction performed as good as models with more covariates. For the final model, cross-validation prediction errors at 6 months poststroke decreased as the number of measurements per subject increased, from a median error of 8.4 points on the ARAT (Q1–Q3:1.7–28.1) when one measurement early poststroke was used, to 2.3 (Q1–Q3:1–7.2) for seven measurements. An online version of the recovery model was developed that can be linked to data acquisition environments. CONCLUSION: Our innovative dynamic model can predict real-time, patient-specific upper limb capacity recovery profiles up to 6 months poststroke. The model can use all available serially assessed data in a flexible way, creating a prediction at any desired moment poststroke, stand-alone or linked with an electronic health record system. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142441/ /pubmed/33479046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cerebrovascular Disease
Selles, Ruud W
Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
Nijland, Rinske H
van der Vliet, Rick
Slaman, Jorrit
van Wegen, Erwin EH
Rizopoulos, Dimitris
Ribbers, Gerard M
Meskers, Carel GM
Kwakkel, Gert
Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
title Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
title_full Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
title_fullStr Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
title_full_unstemmed Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
title_short Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
title_sort computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
topic Cerebrovascular Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637
work_keys_str_mv AT sellesruudw computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT andrinopoulouelenirosalina computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT nijlandrinskeh computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT vandervlietrick computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT slamanjorrit computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT vanwegenerwineh computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT rizopoulosdimitris computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT ribbersgerardm computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT meskerscarelgm computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep
AT kwakkelgert computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep