Cargando…
Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step
INTRODUCTION: Predicting upper limb capacity recovery is important to set treatment goals, select therapies and plan discharge. We introduce a prediction model of the patient-specific profile of upper limb capacity recovery up to 6 months poststroke by incorporating all serially assessed clinical in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637 |
_version_ | 1783696552247689216 |
---|---|
author | Selles, Ruud W Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina Nijland, Rinske H van der Vliet, Rick Slaman, Jorrit van Wegen, Erwin EH Rizopoulos, Dimitris Ribbers, Gerard M Meskers, Carel GM Kwakkel, Gert |
author_facet | Selles, Ruud W Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina Nijland, Rinske H van der Vliet, Rick Slaman, Jorrit van Wegen, Erwin EH Rizopoulos, Dimitris Ribbers, Gerard M Meskers, Carel GM Kwakkel, Gert |
author_sort | Selles, Ruud W |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Predicting upper limb capacity recovery is important to set treatment goals, select therapies and plan discharge. We introduce a prediction model of the patient-specific profile of upper limb capacity recovery up to 6 months poststroke by incorporating all serially assessed clinical information from patients. METHODS: Model input was recovery profile of 450 patients with a first-ever ischaemic hemispheric stroke measured using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Subjects received at least three assessment sessions, starting within the first week until 6 months poststroke. We developed mixed-effects models that are able to deal with one or multiple measurements per subject, measured at non-fixed time points. The prediction accuracy of the different models was established by a fivefold cross-validation procedure. RESULTS: A model with only ARAT time course, finger extension and shoulder abduction performed as good as models with more covariates. For the final model, cross-validation prediction errors at 6 months poststroke decreased as the number of measurements per subject increased, from a median error of 8.4 points on the ARAT (Q1–Q3:1.7–28.1) when one measurement early poststroke was used, to 2.3 (Q1–Q3:1–7.2) for seven measurements. An online version of the recovery model was developed that can be linked to data acquisition environments. CONCLUSION: Our innovative dynamic model can predict real-time, patient-specific upper limb capacity recovery profiles up to 6 months poststroke. The model can use all available serially assessed data in a flexible way, creating a prediction at any desired moment poststroke, stand-alone or linked with an electronic health record system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8142441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81424412021-06-07 Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step Selles, Ruud W Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina Nijland, Rinske H van der Vliet, Rick Slaman, Jorrit van Wegen, Erwin EH Rizopoulos, Dimitris Ribbers, Gerard M Meskers, Carel GM Kwakkel, Gert J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Cerebrovascular Disease INTRODUCTION: Predicting upper limb capacity recovery is important to set treatment goals, select therapies and plan discharge. We introduce a prediction model of the patient-specific profile of upper limb capacity recovery up to 6 months poststroke by incorporating all serially assessed clinical information from patients. METHODS: Model input was recovery profile of 450 patients with a first-ever ischaemic hemispheric stroke measured using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Subjects received at least three assessment sessions, starting within the first week until 6 months poststroke. We developed mixed-effects models that are able to deal with one or multiple measurements per subject, measured at non-fixed time points. The prediction accuracy of the different models was established by a fivefold cross-validation procedure. RESULTS: A model with only ARAT time course, finger extension and shoulder abduction performed as good as models with more covariates. For the final model, cross-validation prediction errors at 6 months poststroke decreased as the number of measurements per subject increased, from a median error of 8.4 points on the ARAT (Q1–Q3:1.7–28.1) when one measurement early poststroke was used, to 2.3 (Q1–Q3:1–7.2) for seven measurements. An online version of the recovery model was developed that can be linked to data acquisition environments. CONCLUSION: Our innovative dynamic model can predict real-time, patient-specific upper limb capacity recovery profiles up to 6 months poststroke. The model can use all available serially assessed data in a flexible way, creating a prediction at any desired moment poststroke, stand-alone or linked with an electronic health record system. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142441/ /pubmed/33479046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cerebrovascular Disease Selles, Ruud W Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina Nijland, Rinske H van der Vliet, Rick Slaman, Jorrit van Wegen, Erwin EH Rizopoulos, Dimitris Ribbers, Gerard M Meskers, Carel GM Kwakkel, Gert Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
title | Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
title_full | Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
title_fullStr | Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
title_full_unstemmed | Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
title_short | Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
title_sort | computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step |
topic | Cerebrovascular Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sellesruudw computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT andrinopoulouelenirosalina computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT nijlandrinskeh computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT vandervlietrick computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT slamanjorrit computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT vanwegenerwineh computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT rizopoulosdimitris computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT ribbersgerardm computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT meskerscarelgm computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep AT kwakkelgert computerisedpatientspecificpredictionoftherecoveryprofileofupperlimbcapacitywithinstrokeservicesthenextstep |