Cargando…

Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention

BACKGROUND: Children are vulnerable to the effects of second-hand smoke exposure. Creating smoke-free homes is an effective strategy to limit exposure. We developed a smoke-free intervention (SFI) using children as a catalyst for change and teaching skills to negotiate a smoke-free home. In this pap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Cath, Huque, Rumana, Ahmed, Farid, Nasreen, Shammi, Shah, Sarwat, Ahluwalia, Jasjit S., Kanaan, Mona, Sheikh, Aziz, Siddiqi, Kamran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34030729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00853-9
_version_ 1783696560208478208
author Jackson, Cath
Huque, Rumana
Ahmed, Farid
Nasreen, Shammi
Shah, Sarwat
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
Kanaan, Mona
Sheikh, Aziz
Siddiqi, Kamran
author_facet Jackson, Cath
Huque, Rumana
Ahmed, Farid
Nasreen, Shammi
Shah, Sarwat
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
Kanaan, Mona
Sheikh, Aziz
Siddiqi, Kamran
author_sort Jackson, Cath
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children are vulnerable to the effects of second-hand smoke exposure. Creating smoke-free homes is an effective strategy to limit exposure. We developed a smoke-free intervention (SFI) using children as a catalyst for change and teaching skills to negotiate a smoke-free home. In this paper, we present the process evaluation conducted within a pilot trial. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study comprising qualitative interviews and quantitative fidelity assessment of SFI delivery. Interviews in the six intervention schools were conducted with six headteachers and 12 teachers. These explored experiences of delivering the SFI, perceived impact, barriers and facilitators to success, and ideas for improvement and for scaling up. The data were analysed using framework analysis. Delivery of the SFI was observed and fidelity scores calculated. RESULTS: The SFI was acceptable to headteachers and teachers. Fidelity scores ranged from 27/40 to 37/40. Didactic components were more fully implemented than interactive components. Time to complete the sessions, timing in the school day and school calendar were key challenges. Embedding the SFI into the curriculum was a potential solution. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide useful information to finalise the content and delivery and inform the scale-up of the SFI for our definitive trial, which is now underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN68690577
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81424782021-05-25 Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention Jackson, Cath Huque, Rumana Ahmed, Farid Nasreen, Shammi Shah, Sarwat Ahluwalia, Jasjit S. Kanaan, Mona Sheikh, Aziz Siddiqi, Kamran Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Children are vulnerable to the effects of second-hand smoke exposure. Creating smoke-free homes is an effective strategy to limit exposure. We developed a smoke-free intervention (SFI) using children as a catalyst for change and teaching skills to negotiate a smoke-free home. In this paper, we present the process evaluation conducted within a pilot trial. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study comprising qualitative interviews and quantitative fidelity assessment of SFI delivery. Interviews in the six intervention schools were conducted with six headteachers and 12 teachers. These explored experiences of delivering the SFI, perceived impact, barriers and facilitators to success, and ideas for improvement and for scaling up. The data were analysed using framework analysis. Delivery of the SFI was observed and fidelity scores calculated. RESULTS: The SFI was acceptable to headteachers and teachers. Fidelity scores ranged from 27/40 to 37/40. Didactic components were more fully implemented than interactive components. Time to complete the sessions, timing in the school day and school calendar were key challenges. Embedding the SFI into the curriculum was a potential solution. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide useful information to finalise the content and delivery and inform the scale-up of the SFI for our definitive trial, which is now underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN68690577 BioMed Central 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8142478/ /pubmed/34030729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00853-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jackson, Cath
Huque, Rumana
Ahmed, Farid
Nasreen, Shammi
Shah, Sarwat
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
Kanaan, Mona
Sheikh, Aziz
Siddiqi, Kamran
Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
title Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
title_full Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
title_fullStr Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
title_full_unstemmed Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
title_short Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
title_sort children learning about second-hand smoke (class ii): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34030729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00853-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksoncath childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT huquerumana childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT ahmedfarid childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT nasreenshammi childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT shahsarwat childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT ahluwaliajasjits childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT kanaanmona childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT sheikhaziz childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention
AT siddiqikamran childrenlearningaboutsecondhandsmokeclassiiamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofaschoolbasedintervention