Cargando…
Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders
OBJECTIVES: Protecting healthcare workers from psychological harm is an urgent clinical issue within the current COVID-19 pandemic. Research on early psychological programmes that aim to prevent or reduce mental health symptoms and that have been tested in frontline responders may assist service pro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044134 |
_version_ | 1783696599575166976 |
---|---|
author | Hooper, Jasmine Jean Saulsman, Lisa Hall, Tammy Waters, Flavie |
author_facet | Hooper, Jasmine Jean Saulsman, Lisa Hall, Tammy Waters, Flavie |
author_sort | Hooper, Jasmine Jean |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Protecting healthcare workers from psychological harm is an urgent clinical issue within the current COVID-19 pandemic. Research on early psychological programmes that aim to prevent or reduce mental health symptoms and that have been tested in frontline responders may assist service providers with choosing a suitable intervention for rapid dissemination in healthcare settings. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: First, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched through a systematic literature review of early psychological interventions administered to frontline responders in the last 15 years. Interventions were included if they were designed to prevent or reduce psychological impact and had outcome measures of psychological distress (eg, general psychopathology, post-traumatic stress disorder and stress) and/or positive mental health domains (eg, resilience, self-efficacy and life satisfaction). Second, the suitability of these programmes for the healthcare workforce was evaluated according to the criteria of effectiveness, content applicability and feasibility. RESULTS: Of 320 articles retrieved, 12 relevant studies were included that described six early psychological interventions. Although the evidence base is limited, psychological first aid, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, and trauma risk management showed effectiveness across at least two studies each with frontline workers. Resilience and coping for the healthcare community; anticipate, plan, and deter; and resilience at work programmes found promising results in single studies. Concerning other suitability criteria, all programmes appear applicable to healthcare settings and have acceptable feasibility for rapid implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited evidence, several interventions were identified as potentially suitable and useful for improving psychological functioning of healthcare workers across a variety of disaster situations. Service providers should continue to implement and evaluate early psychological interventions in frontline workers in order to refine best practices for managing the psychological impact of future disasters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8142676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81426762021-05-24 Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders Hooper, Jasmine Jean Saulsman, Lisa Hall, Tammy Waters, Flavie BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Protecting healthcare workers from psychological harm is an urgent clinical issue within the current COVID-19 pandemic. Research on early psychological programmes that aim to prevent or reduce mental health symptoms and that have been tested in frontline responders may assist service providers with choosing a suitable intervention for rapid dissemination in healthcare settings. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: First, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched through a systematic literature review of early psychological interventions administered to frontline responders in the last 15 years. Interventions were included if they were designed to prevent or reduce psychological impact and had outcome measures of psychological distress (eg, general psychopathology, post-traumatic stress disorder and stress) and/or positive mental health domains (eg, resilience, self-efficacy and life satisfaction). Second, the suitability of these programmes for the healthcare workforce was evaluated according to the criteria of effectiveness, content applicability and feasibility. RESULTS: Of 320 articles retrieved, 12 relevant studies were included that described six early psychological interventions. Although the evidence base is limited, psychological first aid, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, and trauma risk management showed effectiveness across at least two studies each with frontline workers. Resilience and coping for the healthcare community; anticipate, plan, and deter; and resilience at work programmes found promising results in single studies. Concerning other suitability criteria, all programmes appear applicable to healthcare settings and have acceptable feasibility for rapid implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited evidence, several interventions were identified as potentially suitable and useful for improving psychological functioning of healthcare workers across a variety of disaster situations. Service providers should continue to implement and evaluate early psychological interventions in frontline workers in order to refine best practices for managing the psychological impact of future disasters. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142676/ /pubmed/34020974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044134 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Hooper, Jasmine Jean Saulsman, Lisa Hall, Tammy Waters, Flavie Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
title | Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
title_full | Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
title_fullStr | Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
title_full_unstemmed | Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
title_short | Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
title_sort | addressing the psychological impact of covid-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hooperjasminejean addressingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19onhealthcareworkerslearningfromasystematicreviewofearlyinterventionsforfrontlineresponders AT saulsmanlisa addressingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19onhealthcareworkerslearningfromasystematicreviewofearlyinterventionsforfrontlineresponders AT halltammy addressingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19onhealthcareworkerslearningfromasystematicreviewofearlyinterventionsforfrontlineresponders AT watersflavie addressingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19onhealthcareworkerslearningfromasystematicreviewofearlyinterventionsforfrontlineresponders |