Cargando…

A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients

Background: Rural patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may be less likely to access HCV care than those in urban areas. A telementoring, task-shifting model has been implemented to address the unmet needs of HCV care. Evidence is needed on whether this intervention improves HCV ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Ping, Yin, Xin, Kong, Lan, Jung, Jeah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0001
_version_ 1783696600266178560
author Du, Ping
Yin, Xin
Kong, Lan
Jung, Jeah
author_facet Du, Ping
Yin, Xin
Kong, Lan
Jung, Jeah
author_sort Du, Ping
collection PubMed
description Background: Rural patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may be less likely to access HCV care than those in urban areas. A telementoring, task-shifting model has been implemented to address the unmet needs of HCV care. Evidence is needed on whether this intervention improves HCV care in rural HCV patients. Methods: We compared three key HCV care indicators among Medicare patients with chronic hepatitis C in 2014–2016 by urban–rural status between New Mexico with a telementoring program and Pennsylvania without such a program. We classified each patient's urban–rural status based on his or her ZIP code of residence. We used multivariable log-binomial regressions to examine the relative probability of receiving HCV care by urban and rural status in two states. Results: In New Mexico, 41.3% of HCV patients resided in rural areas (N = 1155). In Pennsylvania, rural patients accounted for 13.2% (N = 1775). The unadjusted overall rates of receiving HCV RNA or genotype testing within 12 months before HCV treatment were 76.1% in “rural-New Mexico” versus 73.3% in “rural-Pennsylvania,” 66.2% in “urban-New Mexico,” and 70.2% in “urban-Pennsylvania.” Post-treatment HCV RNA testing rate was also high in “rural-New Mexico” (83.0%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, “rural-New Mexico” HCV patients who received HCV treatment still had the highest probability of taking HCV RNA or genotype testing before HCV treatment, compared with other groups (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.91 [0.84–1.00] in “rural-Pennsylvania,” 0.85 [0.78–0.93] in “urban-New Mexico,” and 0.93 [0.87–1.00] in “urban-Pennsylvania”). Conclusions: The telementoring program may help improve HCV care in rural patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81426822021-05-24 A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients Du, Ping Yin, Xin Kong, Lan Jung, Jeah Telemed Rep Brief Communication Background: Rural patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may be less likely to access HCV care than those in urban areas. A telementoring, task-shifting model has been implemented to address the unmet needs of HCV care. Evidence is needed on whether this intervention improves HCV care in rural HCV patients. Methods: We compared three key HCV care indicators among Medicare patients with chronic hepatitis C in 2014–2016 by urban–rural status between New Mexico with a telementoring program and Pennsylvania without such a program. We classified each patient's urban–rural status based on his or her ZIP code of residence. We used multivariable log-binomial regressions to examine the relative probability of receiving HCV care by urban and rural status in two states. Results: In New Mexico, 41.3% of HCV patients resided in rural areas (N = 1155). In Pennsylvania, rural patients accounted for 13.2% (N = 1775). The unadjusted overall rates of receiving HCV RNA or genotype testing within 12 months before HCV treatment were 76.1% in “rural-New Mexico” versus 73.3% in “rural-Pennsylvania,” 66.2% in “urban-New Mexico,” and 70.2% in “urban-Pennsylvania.” Post-treatment HCV RNA testing rate was also high in “rural-New Mexico” (83.0%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, “rural-New Mexico” HCV patients who received HCV treatment still had the highest probability of taking HCV RNA or genotype testing before HCV treatment, compared with other groups (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.91 [0.84–1.00] in “rural-Pennsylvania,” 0.85 [0.78–0.93] in “urban-New Mexico,” and 0.93 [0.87–1.00] in “urban-Pennsylvania”). Conclusions: The telementoring program may help improve HCV care in rural patients. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8142682/ /pubmed/34041510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0001 Text en © Ping Du et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Du, Ping
Yin, Xin
Kong, Lan
Jung, Jeah
A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients
title A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients
title_full A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients
title_fullStr A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients
title_short A Telementoring Program and Hepatitis C Virus Care in Rural Patients
title_sort telementoring program and hepatitis c virus care in rural patients
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0001
work_keys_str_mv AT duping atelementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT yinxin atelementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT konglan atelementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT jungjeah atelementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT duping telementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT yinxin telementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT konglan telementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients
AT jungjeah telementoringprogramandhepatitiscviruscareinruralpatients