Cargando…

Muscle in vein conduits: our experience

Muscle in vein (MIV) conduits have gradually been employed in the last 20 years as a valuable technique in bridging peripheral nerve gaps after nerve lesions who cannot undergo a direct tension-free coaptation. The advantages of this procedure comparing to the actual benchmark (autograft) is the spa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minini, A, Megaro, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944845
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9202
_version_ 1783696623585460224
author Minini, A
Megaro, A
author_facet Minini, A
Megaro, A
author_sort Minini, A
collection PubMed
description Muscle in vein (MIV) conduits have gradually been employed in the last 20 years as a valuable technique in bridging peripheral nerve gaps after nerve lesions who cannot undergo a direct tension-free coaptation. The advantages of this procedure comparing to the actual benchmark (autograft) is the sparing of the donor site, and the huge availability of both components (i.e. muscle and veins). Here we present a case serie of four MIV performed at our hospital from 2018 to 2019. The results we obtained in our experience confirmed its effectiveness both in nerve regeneration (as sensibility recovery) and in neuropathic pain eradication. Our positive outcomes encourage its use in selected cases of residual nerve gaps up to 30 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81427882021-05-27 Muscle in vein conduits: our experience Minini, A Megaro, A Acta Biomed Original Article Muscle in vein (MIV) conduits have gradually been employed in the last 20 years as a valuable technique in bridging peripheral nerve gaps after nerve lesions who cannot undergo a direct tension-free coaptation. The advantages of this procedure comparing to the actual benchmark (autograft) is the sparing of the donor site, and the huge availability of both components (i.e. muscle and veins). Here we present a case serie of four MIV performed at our hospital from 2018 to 2019. The results we obtained in our experience confirmed its effectiveness both in nerve regeneration (as sensibility recovery) and in neuropathic pain eradication. Our positive outcomes encourage its use in selected cases of residual nerve gaps up to 30 mm. Mattioli 1885 2021 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8142788/ /pubmed/33944845 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9202 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Minini, A
Megaro, A
Muscle in vein conduits: our experience
title Muscle in vein conduits: our experience
title_full Muscle in vein conduits: our experience
title_fullStr Muscle in vein conduits: our experience
title_full_unstemmed Muscle in vein conduits: our experience
title_short Muscle in vein conduits: our experience
title_sort muscle in vein conduits: our experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944845
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9202
work_keys_str_mv AT mininia muscleinveinconduitsourexperience
AT megaroa muscleinveinconduitsourexperience