Cargando…

Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada

Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across juri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, Alan, Enns, Jennifer, Wong, Sabrina T, Williamson, Tyler, Singer, Alexander, McGrail, Kimberlyn, Bakal, Jeffery A, Taylor, Carole, Peterson, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Swansea University 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095523
http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.437
_version_ 1783696652637306880
author Katz, Alan
Enns, Jennifer
Wong, Sabrina T
Williamson, Tyler
Singer, Alexander
McGrail, Kimberlyn
Bakal, Jeffery A
Taylor, Carole
Peterson, Sandra
author_facet Katz, Alan
Enns, Jennifer
Wong, Sabrina T
Williamson, Tyler
Singer, Alexander
McGrail, Kimberlyn
Bakal, Jeffery A
Taylor, Carole
Peterson, Sandra
author_sort Katz, Alan
collection PubMed
description Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across jurisdictional boundaries, in part because of inefficient and cumbersome procedures to access these data and gain approval for their use in research. A lack of harmonization among variables and indicators makes it difficult to compare research among jurisdictions. These challenges affect the quality, scope, and impact of work that could be done. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the data access procedures in three Canadian jurisdictions (Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia), and to describe how we addressed the challenges presented by differences in data governance and architecture in a Canadian cross-jurisdictional research study. We characterize common stages in gaining access to administrative data among jurisdictions, including obtaining ethics approval, applying for data access from data custodians, and ensuring the extracted data is released to accredited individuals in secure data environments. We identify advantages of Manitoba’s flexible ‘stewardship’ model over the more restrictive ‘custodianship’ model in British Columbia, and highlight the importance of communication between analysts in each jurisdiction to compensate for differences in coding variables and poor quality data. Researchers and system planners must have access to and be able to make effective use of administrative health data to ensure that Canadians continue to have access to high-quality health care and benefit from effective health policies. The considerable benefits of collaborative population-based research that spans jurisdictional borders have been recognized by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research in their recent call for the creation of a National Data Platform to resolve many of the issues in harmonization and validation of administrative data elements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Swansea University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81429482021-06-04 Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada Katz, Alan Enns, Jennifer Wong, Sabrina T Williamson, Tyler Singer, Alexander McGrail, Kimberlyn Bakal, Jeffery A Taylor, Carole Peterson, Sandra Int J Popul Data Sci Population Data Science Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across jurisdictional boundaries, in part because of inefficient and cumbersome procedures to access these data and gain approval for their use in research. A lack of harmonization among variables and indicators makes it difficult to compare research among jurisdictions. These challenges affect the quality, scope, and impact of work that could be done. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the data access procedures in three Canadian jurisdictions (Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia), and to describe how we addressed the challenges presented by differences in data governance and architecture in a Canadian cross-jurisdictional research study. We characterize common stages in gaining access to administrative data among jurisdictions, including obtaining ethics approval, applying for data access from data custodians, and ensuring the extracted data is released to accredited individuals in secure data environments. We identify advantages of Manitoba’s flexible ‘stewardship’ model over the more restrictive ‘custodianship’ model in British Columbia, and highlight the importance of communication between analysts in each jurisdiction to compensate for differences in coding variables and poor quality data. Researchers and system planners must have access to and be able to make effective use of administrative health data to ensure that Canadians continue to have access to high-quality health care and benefit from effective health policies. The considerable benefits of collaborative population-based research that spans jurisdictional borders have been recognized by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research in their recent call for the creation of a National Data Platform to resolve many of the issues in harmonization and validation of administrative data elements. Swansea University 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8142948/ /pubmed/34095523 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.437 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Population Data Science
Katz, Alan
Enns, Jennifer
Wong, Sabrina T
Williamson, Tyler
Singer, Alexander
McGrail, Kimberlyn
Bakal, Jeffery A
Taylor, Carole
Peterson, Sandra
Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
title Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
title_full Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
title_fullStr Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
title_short Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
title_sort challenges associated with cross-jurisdictional analyses using administrative health data and primary care electronic medical records in canada
topic Population Data Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095523
http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.437
work_keys_str_mv AT katzalan challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT ennsjennifer challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT wongsabrinat challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT williamsontyler challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT singeralexander challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT mcgrailkimberlyn challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT bakaljefferya challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT taylorcarole challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada
AT petersonsandra challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada