Cargando…
Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada
Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across juri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Swansea University
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095523 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.437 |
_version_ | 1783696652637306880 |
---|---|
author | Katz, Alan Enns, Jennifer Wong, Sabrina T Williamson, Tyler Singer, Alexander McGrail, Kimberlyn Bakal, Jeffery A Taylor, Carole Peterson, Sandra |
author_facet | Katz, Alan Enns, Jennifer Wong, Sabrina T Williamson, Tyler Singer, Alexander McGrail, Kimberlyn Bakal, Jeffery A Taylor, Carole Peterson, Sandra |
author_sort | Katz, Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across jurisdictional boundaries, in part because of inefficient and cumbersome procedures to access these data and gain approval for their use in research. A lack of harmonization among variables and indicators makes it difficult to compare research among jurisdictions. These challenges affect the quality, scope, and impact of work that could be done. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the data access procedures in three Canadian jurisdictions (Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia), and to describe how we addressed the challenges presented by differences in data governance and architecture in a Canadian cross-jurisdictional research study. We characterize common stages in gaining access to administrative data among jurisdictions, including obtaining ethics approval, applying for data access from data custodians, and ensuring the extracted data is released to accredited individuals in secure data environments. We identify advantages of Manitoba’s flexible ‘stewardship’ model over the more restrictive ‘custodianship’ model in British Columbia, and highlight the importance of communication between analysts in each jurisdiction to compensate for differences in coding variables and poor quality data. Researchers and system planners must have access to and be able to make effective use of administrative health data to ensure that Canadians continue to have access to high-quality health care and benefit from effective health policies. The considerable benefits of collaborative population-based research that spans jurisdictional borders have been recognized by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research in their recent call for the creation of a National Data Platform to resolve many of the issues in harmonization and validation of administrative data elements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8142948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Swansea University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81429482021-06-04 Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada Katz, Alan Enns, Jennifer Wong, Sabrina T Williamson, Tyler Singer, Alexander McGrail, Kimberlyn Bakal, Jeffery A Taylor, Carole Peterson, Sandra Int J Popul Data Sci Population Data Science Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across jurisdictional boundaries, in part because of inefficient and cumbersome procedures to access these data and gain approval for their use in research. A lack of harmonization among variables and indicators makes it difficult to compare research among jurisdictions. These challenges affect the quality, scope, and impact of work that could be done. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the data access procedures in three Canadian jurisdictions (Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia), and to describe how we addressed the challenges presented by differences in data governance and architecture in a Canadian cross-jurisdictional research study. We characterize common stages in gaining access to administrative data among jurisdictions, including obtaining ethics approval, applying for data access from data custodians, and ensuring the extracted data is released to accredited individuals in secure data environments. We identify advantages of Manitoba’s flexible ‘stewardship’ model over the more restrictive ‘custodianship’ model in British Columbia, and highlight the importance of communication between analysts in each jurisdiction to compensate for differences in coding variables and poor quality data. Researchers and system planners must have access to and be able to make effective use of administrative health data to ensure that Canadians continue to have access to high-quality health care and benefit from effective health policies. The considerable benefits of collaborative population-based research that spans jurisdictional borders have been recognized by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research in their recent call for the creation of a National Data Platform to resolve many of the issues in harmonization and validation of administrative data elements. Swansea University 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8142948/ /pubmed/34095523 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.437 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Population Data Science Katz, Alan Enns, Jennifer Wong, Sabrina T Williamson, Tyler Singer, Alexander McGrail, Kimberlyn Bakal, Jeffery A Taylor, Carole Peterson, Sandra Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada |
title | Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada |
title_full | Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada |
title_fullStr | Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada |
title_short | Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada |
title_sort | challenges associated with cross-jurisdictional analyses using administrative health data and primary care electronic medical records in canada |
topic | Population Data Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095523 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzalan challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT ennsjennifer challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT wongsabrinat challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT williamsontyler challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT singeralexander challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT mcgrailkimberlyn challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT bakaljefferya challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT taylorcarole challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada AT petersonsandra challengesassociatedwithcrossjurisdictionalanalysesusingadministrativehealthdataandprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordsincanada |