Cargando…
Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass.
INTRODUCTION: Researchers are increasingly using routinely collected data in addition to, or instead of, other data collection methods. The UK government continues to invest in research centres to encourage use of these data, and trials and cohort studies utilise data linkage methods in the follow-u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Swansea University
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095522 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.432 |
_version_ | 1783696653718388736 |
---|---|
author | Lugg-Widger, Fiona V Angel, Lianna Cannings-John, Rebecca Hood, Kerenza Hughes, Kathryn Moody, Gwenllian Robling, Michael |
author_facet | Lugg-Widger, Fiona V Angel, Lianna Cannings-John, Rebecca Hood, Kerenza Hughes, Kathryn Moody, Gwenllian Robling, Michael |
author_sort | Lugg-Widger, Fiona V |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Researchers are increasingly using routinely collected data in addition to, or instead of, other data collection methods. The UK government continues to invest in research centres to encourage use of these data, and trials and cohort studies utilise data linkage methods in the follow-up of participants. This does not come without its limitations and challenges, such as data access delays. OBJECTIVE: This paper outlines the challenges faced by three projects utilising individual-level routinely-collected linked data for the longer-term follow-up of participants. METHODS: These studies are varied in design, study population and data providers. One researcher was common to the three studies and collated relevant study correspondence, formal documentary evidence such as data sharing agreements and, where relevant, meeting records to review. Key themes were identified and reviewed by other members of the research teams. Mitigating strategies were identified and discussed with a data provider representative and a broader group of researchers to finalise the recommendations presented. RESULTS: The challenges discussed are grouped into five themes: Data application process; Project timelines; Dependencies and considerations related to consent; Information Governance; Contractual. In presenting our results descriptively we summarise each case study, identify the main cross-cutting themes and consider the potential for mitigation of challenges. CONCLUSIONS: We make recommendations that identify responsibilities for both researchers and data providers for mitigating and managing data access challenges. A continued conversation within the research community and with data providers is needed to continue to enable researchers to access and utilise the wealth of routinely-collected data available. The suggestions made in this paper will help researchers be better prepared to deal with the challenges of applying for data from multiple data providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8142952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Swansea University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81429522021-06-04 Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. Lugg-Widger, Fiona V Angel, Lianna Cannings-John, Rebecca Hood, Kerenza Hughes, Kathryn Moody, Gwenllian Robling, Michael Int J Popul Data Sci Population Data Science INTRODUCTION: Researchers are increasingly using routinely collected data in addition to, or instead of, other data collection methods. The UK government continues to invest in research centres to encourage use of these data, and trials and cohort studies utilise data linkage methods in the follow-up of participants. This does not come without its limitations and challenges, such as data access delays. OBJECTIVE: This paper outlines the challenges faced by three projects utilising individual-level routinely-collected linked data for the longer-term follow-up of participants. METHODS: These studies are varied in design, study population and data providers. One researcher was common to the three studies and collated relevant study correspondence, formal documentary evidence such as data sharing agreements and, where relevant, meeting records to review. Key themes were identified and reviewed by other members of the research teams. Mitigating strategies were identified and discussed with a data provider representative and a broader group of researchers to finalise the recommendations presented. RESULTS: The challenges discussed are grouped into five themes: Data application process; Project timelines; Dependencies and considerations related to consent; Information Governance; Contractual. In presenting our results descriptively we summarise each case study, identify the main cross-cutting themes and consider the potential for mitigation of challenges. CONCLUSIONS: We make recommendations that identify responsibilities for both researchers and data providers for mitigating and managing data access challenges. A continued conversation within the research community and with data providers is needed to continue to enable researchers to access and utilise the wealth of routinely-collected data available. The suggestions made in this paper will help researchers be better prepared to deal with the challenges of applying for data from multiple data providers. Swansea University 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142952/ /pubmed/34095522 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.432 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Population Data Science Lugg-Widger, Fiona V Angel, Lianna Cannings-John, Rebecca Hood, Kerenza Hughes, Kathryn Moody, Gwenllian Robling, Michael Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. |
title | Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. |
title_full | Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. |
title_fullStr | Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. |
title_short | Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass. |
title_sort | challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the uk for primary studies: managing the morass. |
topic | Population Data Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095522 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luggwidgerfionav challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass AT angellianna challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass AT canningsjohnrebecca challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass AT hoodkerenza challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass AT hugheskathryn challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass AT moodygwenllian challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass AT roblingmichael challengesinaccessingroutinelycollecteddatafrommultipleprovidersintheukforprimarystudiesmanagingthemorass |